Justice Kennedy needs a reminder about his own fear of harm from gay marriage

[Rusha]

how do you know that?
and
why is that his agenda?

I read. As in his threads and responses. You should try it sometime.

 

[annabenedetti]

how do you know that?
and
why is that his agenda?

ultimately you have to accuse him of being for something
or
protecting something

sometimes you do have to stir the pot

 

[chrysostom]

I read. As in his threads and responses. You should try it sometime.

another dodged question

 

[Rusha]

another dodged question

sometimes you do have to stir the pot

 

[chrysostom]

I read. As in his threads and responses. You should try it sometime.

so you know his agenda
but
you can't really explain it to us

 

[Rusha]

so you know his agenda
but
you can't really explain it to us

It was explained via his own post:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4266284&postcount=6657

 

[GFR7]

Your opinion has been noted and rejected.



No, you don't. You pretend to care about them as a way to further your agenda. Otherwise, you wouldn't insinuate that biological children are superior to other children, including those who are adopted.

I did nothing of the kind. I said that biological children have certain advantages - especially knowing that they live with their married, natural mother and father - and this has been noted by much research.

 

[GFR7]

so you know his agenda
but
you can't really explain it to us

Thank you for your support. I am not anti-gay or a misogynist, but to tell certain others this is useless.:noid:

 

[TracerBullet]

actually it is two guys living together
that is
more important than placing orphans in a good home

Still waiting for you to respond my my qustion what about the millions of children of same gendered parents - don't they deserve the same protections?

 

[TracerBullet]

Those practices should be discouraged and much of it stopped altogether. Unless you just really don't care about children's rights. I for one, do.

this is incredibly dishonest even for you.

 

[TracerBullet]

Those practices should be discouraged and much of it stopped altogether. Unless you just really don't care about children's rights. I for one, do.

If you cared about children you wouldn't care how they got to this planet, it should be good enough that they are here.

 

[TracerBullet]

so you know his agenda
but
you can't really explain it to us

you want horrors
who has done more
when it comes to placing orphans in good homes?
and
they were forced out of business because they would not accept same sex couples

so what does this tell you?

accepting same sex couples is more important than placing orphans in good homes
and
that says it all

You don't seem to have a problem making claims about the agendas of other people

 

[TracerBullet]

I did nothing of the kind. I said that biological children have certain advantages - especially knowing that they live with their married, natural mother and father - and this has been noted by much research.

No, not much or any research at all coming to this conclusion

 

[GFR7]

If you cared about children you wouldn't care how they got to this planet, it should be good enough that they are here.

Once they're here, of course they're important. I'm just noting that something should be done to curtail some of these issues that have come up. That's all.

 

[GFR7]

No, not much or any research at all coming to this conclusion

OK, then it can continue to be debated.

 

[chrysostom]

You don't seem to have a problem making claims about the agendas of other people

what conclusion would you make
when
an institution that places orphans in good families
gets shut down because they would not accept same sex marriage?

 

[TracerBullet]

what conclusion would you make
when
an institution that places orphans in good families
gets shut down because they would not accept same sex marriage?

really clumsy attempt to change the topic here

 

[chrysostom]

really clumsy attempt to change the topic here

another dodged question

 

[TracerBullet]

another dodged question

yes you've been dodging this question for most of the thread

 

[Sitamun]

what conclusion would you make
when
an institution that places orphans in good families
gets shut down because they would not accept same sex marriage?

For the second time, adoptees aren't orphans! Also, the church has a sketchy record on just what they constitute as "good" homes. Lastly, the church closed the division of their own accord, they weren't forcefully shut down.