I agree with that too.then you're being controlled by something other than Christ
Sent from my SM-G935T using TOL mobile app
I agree with that too.then you're being controlled by something other than Christ
Its mental illness to create a "new" gender.
I agree with that too.
True!Now, let me see......
Questions:-
Have you got a Medical Degree?
Have you sopecialised in Psychiatry?
Have you been called to the bar and served long enough to be a Judge?
In the event that the above answers are 'No', what qualifications have you got that might cause us, here (or anyone out there) to take anything you say seriously?
I don't want to be too offensive, but there's folks 'out there' who might catalogue you as a total nutter.... true?
I know what ur saying about the asexual and if you read from the posts before I'm there with you. But I would like to say something about sex. I truly believe that if you have sex with someone you care about, that's ok, even healthy. For example: I lived in Denmark for a year as an exchange student when I was 18. Denmark is very open about sex, almost too open. In Denmark it's not uncommon for 2 friends, they don't have to be in love, to have sex cause of they're friendship. The next morning ya know everything is cool, they go their separate ways but remain friends. Even if they never have sex again, they were able to share that bond thru friendship. So I believe there are other ways to share love with someone besides marriage. Me and my girlfriend, we have sex, we're not married in the eyes of the law, we love each other and are great friends. And I think that's ok. But let's get back to the healthy part. It IS unhealthy to NOT have sex. It can be done, I speak from experience, but not for too long. Do you know why Catholic priests are perverted? Because they haven't had sex in sooo long! It's unhealthy. It's not cause they are evil. They're just sick! They are the ones that need help or at least to get laid, not the asexuals. And this is coming from a Catholic! This is getting long so ill wrap it up. But I think sin is when you have sex for the flesh, not cause you care for someone.I don't agree with members that think sexual enjoyment is anti-Christ or whatever.
But the 'thing' that makes me laugh is that this thread is about a person who has no sexual identification at all, is asexual, and I guess is most unlikely to be wanting sex with anyone...... !!!!
I know what ur saying about the asexual and if you read from the posts before I'm there with you. But I would like to say something about sex. I truly believe that if you have sex with someone you care about, that's ok, even healthy. For example: I lived in Denmark for a year as an exchange student when I was 18. Denmark is very open about sex, almost too open. In Denmark it's not uncommon for 2 friends, they don't have to be in love, to have sex cause of they're friendship. The next morning ya know everything is cool, they go their separate ways but remain friends. Even if they never have sex again, they were able to share that bond thru friendship. So I believe there are other ways to share love with someone besides marriage. Me and my girlfriend, we have sex, we're not married in the eyes of the law, we love each other and are great friends. And I think that's ok. But let's get back to the healthy part. It IS unhealthy to NOT have sex. It can be done, I speak from experience, but not for too long. Do you know why Catholic priests are perverted? Because they haven't had sex in sooo long! It's unhealthy. It's not cause they are evil. They're just sick! They are the ones that need help or at least to get laid, not the asexuals. And this is coming from a Catholic! This is getting long so ill wrap it up. But I think sin is when you have sex for the flesh, not cause you care for someone.
tell that to heterosexuals who turn gay in prison
Ok ok, that's true but different.
Im a child of God and God created mankind, male and female save a birth defect.Now, let me see......
Questions:-
Have you got a Medical Degree?
Have you sopecialised in Psychiatry?
Have you been called to the bar and served long enough to be a Judge?
In the event that the above answers are 'No', what qualifications have you got that might cause us, here (or anyone out there) to take anything you say seriously?
I don't want to be too offensive, but there's folks 'out there' who might catalogue you as a total nutter.... true?
I don't agree with members that think sexual enjoyment is anti-Christ or whatever.
But the 'thing' that makes me laugh is that this thread is about a person who has no sexual identification at all, is asexual, and I guess is most unlikely to be wanting sex with anyone...... !!!!
View attachment 25516How is it different, it proves a choice can be made.
Defect? Birth Defect?Im a child of God and God created mankind, male and female save a birth defect.
Do the intents and purposes of a leg change if you dont want to use it, and does it become an arm or a new limb? Liberals are nuts.
Sex is a choice but WHO you are attracted to is not. Just cause a man has sex with another man doesn't make him gay, proven in jail,when you have feelings for AND are attracted to the same sex, THAT makes you gay. Same: your having sex with another man. Different: your having sex with the man, not because your attracted to him, but because of the sins of the flesh and there's no women in jail. I'm not saying there's no gay people in jail, I'm just saying what we usually think of as gay sex in jail is cause people don't think they can go without sex so they rape other men.How is it different, it proves a choice can be made.
Yes, absolutelyLet me get this absolutely right...... are you saying that Conservative or Republican or Right Wing folks are all balanced in healthy sanity?
So yes, who you have sex with is a choice. Who you are attracted to is not.How is it different, it proves a choice can be made.