NWL
Active member
You, yourself admitted that you google your replies.
No mystery here...
You're stammering again.
Apple7/Bowman you have yet again demonstrated that you are incapable of defending your position when they are scrutinized and question, I asked numerous questions and reasoning all your points and instead of addressing them you simply mock, change the subject and ask pointless questions in show of unwitting defeat, I will once again shame you by posting my questions and your meaningless responses to them. Either learn how to engage in debate or do not attempt to debate at all.
You have previously accused me of stock piling question when in truth they only developed overtime as you fail to deal with question as they come but instead to ignore them because you find them to troublesome to answer. You are doing exactly the same thing as you did before. What are your intentions this time, to ignore all my question yet again and pick a single one which you think you can best deal with but will no doubt fail again as you have this time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I, NWL, asked the following three questions in reply to your statement of "this passage [Psalms 49:7,8 does NOT show that a ransom is OWED to God" in post 880:
Q. You say "no, this passage does NOT show that a ransom is OWED to God", does Psalms 49:7,8 say that no man can "give to God a ransom"?
Q. According to the verse why can man not pay the ransom to God?
Q. Does the below verse infer that if a man could pay for himself/another that they would "live on forever and not see decay"?
(Psalms 45:7,8) "..No one can redeem another or give to God a ransom for them, the ransom for a life is costly, no payment is ever enough, so that they should live on forever and not see decay..."
Your reply to these questions was "You're stammering again" as you can see by your post quote above. How does this answer the question I asked? Why are you blatantly ignoring my questions?
I ask you to answer these question properly so that I can properly develop my point and reply to what you stated. If you all can make in reply are snide and pointless remarks I will presume you are incapable of answering the questions and are purposely ignoring them as you know answering them will prove the points I have already made true.