Joe Biden says he would force everyone to wear masks in public

[Arthur Brain]

LOL @ you calling the calling of someone "something that could be used to fertilize crops", "restraint".

Yes, because it was given your insistence of using such a pathetic and ignorant term after Chair had explained things to you. Only a pathetic little piece of work would continue with it.

 

[7djengo7]

So then you're saying that masks help some? Interesting.

LOL

Where'd you get that? Not from what he wrote, of course.

From "masks don't help much" it does not follow that "masks help some". Of course, from "masks don't help (at all)" it follows that "masks don't help much".

Just like how, from "User Name doesn't often think logically when writing TOL posts", it does not follow that "User Name thinks logically once in a while when writing TOL posts". User Name never thinks logically when writing TOL posts, and therefore, User Name does not often think logically when writing TOL posts.

 

[Arthur Brain]

If you cite a study, it's what you are saying. So, don't blame me for words you put in your own mouth.

Listen to the study. Since masks aren't that big a deal, mandating them can't help much but it sure can hurt. If you don't think you need to apologize, it's just sad for you.


Sweden is directly relevant to mandatory mask wearing. They didn't do it for sound scientific reasons and history shows they were right. Humble yourself when someone else is proven right and listen to them - for your own good.


It's possible they didn't, but with few new cases or deaths that looks unlikely.


What? You need to use a little logic here. I'm not trying to use the monopoly on violence the state has to force you to take your mask off. It's you that's proposing state violence against me.


According to science and pragmatism it isn't. What's left as a reason to mandate masks? There's irrational fear and man's desire to lord it over their fellow man. Which one is your reason?


Partially effective is less effective than you think because a virus only needs a certain vector threshold to infect a population. And that threshold is way lower than the most draconian tyrannical orders any government has thought up this pandemic go-around. And it becomes anti-effective when we factor in lives lost to a bad economy and a false sense of security. Are you saying we don't need to factor that in?


Freedom is security. To claim we can give up freedom for security is a category error.


Dude... listen to yourself. You say you aren't a wacko on this subject, trying to justify your support of state violence to lord it over people - and in the very next sentence you support state violence, the definition of lording it over people!


I just showed you scientific and pragmatic reasons why I don't need it. What are you standing on? Fear? The human tendency to control others?

Wow, it's "state violence" to get people to wear masks? Talk about ridiculous...

 

[7djengo7]

Yes, because it was given your insistence of using such a pathetic and ignorant term after Chair had explained things to you. Only a pathetic little piece of work would continue with it.

LOL @ your insistence of continuing with your Nazi leftard thinking, you self-righteous hypocrite Nazi leftard?

When you call chair's calling me "something that can be used to fertilize crops", "restraint", what exactly is it you are saying chair was restraining himself from doing in his calling me "something that can be used to fertilize crops"?

 

[Arthur Brain]

LOL

Where'd you get that? Not from what he wrote, of course.

From "masks don't help much" it does not follow that "masks help some". Of course, from "masks don't help (at all)" it follows that "masks don't help much".

Just like how, from "User Name doesn't often think logically when writing TOL posts", it does not follow that "User Name thinks logically once in a while when writing TOL posts". User Name never thinks logically when writing TOL posts, and therefore, User Name does not often think logically when writing TOL posts.

This from someone who displays all of the intelligence attributes of a watermelon...

:freak:

 

[Arthur Brain]

LOL @ your insistence of continuing with your Nazi leftard thinking, you self-righteous hypocrite Nazi leftard?

When you call chair's calling me "something that can be used to fertilize crops", "restraint", what exactly is it you are saying chair was restraining himself from doing in his calling me "something that can be used to fertilize crops"?

Can't continue with something I've never done in the first place and is simply in the "mind" of someone who's either flat out thick, a kid in dire need of an education or a dopey troll.

On the latter, do the math. Use an abacus if it helps.

 

[7djengo7]

Wow, it's "state violence" to get people to wear masks? Talk about ridiculous...

LOL @ Arthur "Hitler" Brain

You, brutish, vicious, Nazi leftard fool. You are now on record as having, right here, asininely claimed that everybody wearing a mask these days is doing so because he/she has personally been persuaded that it is good for their, and/or, other people's health and wellbeing to do so. And, you are claiming this despite the fact that numerous people continually speak out that, to the contrary, we are not one iota persuaded that it is so. Sorry, but it takes violence, or a threat of violence, for people to be caused, by the state, to wear masks against their will. How unbelievably ridiculous of you to deny, or to pretend to deny, this elementary, universal truth. Obviously you also think it is ridiculous to consider it "state violence" on the part of your Nazi leftard collectivist comrade, Adolf Hitler, to cause certain people to wear yellow star badges, whom he wished to be marked by yellow star badges.

One sense in which wearing a mask could be helpful to somebody's health and wellbeing is for him/her to wear a mask, against his/her will, in attempts to avoid being threatened, or physically assaulted, by those of your Nazi leftard comrades who specialize and revel in enacting mob violence against individuals who stand out from the Nazi leftard booboisie (your crowd) by being mask-less, as non-conformists against your collectivist Nazi leftardation.

You're so amazingly abjectly stupid and slimy to be able to sit there and pretend to think that the state does not use violence, or the threat of violence, to try to get people to do things against their will.

Yeah, you sniveling, state-worshiping idiot: The state demanding that individuals must wear masks, against the individuals' wills, is the state threatening violence against individuals in order to try to achieve your Nazi leftard objective of getting everybody to wear a mask.

 

[7djengo7]

This from someone who displays all of the intelligence attributes of a watermelon...

:freak:

LOL

 

[Arthur Brain]

LOL @ Arthur "Hitler" Brain

You, brutish, vicious, Nazi leftard fool. You are now on record as having, right here, asininely claimed that everybody wearing a mask these days is doing so because he/she has personally been persuaded that it is good for their, and/or, other people's health and wellbeing to do so. And, you are claiming this despite the fact that numerous people continually speak out that, to the contrary, we are not one iota persuaded that it is so. Sorry, but it takes violence, or a threat of violence, for people to be caused, by the state, to wear masks against their will. How unbelievably ridiculous of you to deny, or to pretend to deny, this elementary, universal truth. Obviously you also think it is ridiculous to consider it "state violence" on the part of your Nazi leftard collectivist comrade, Adolf Hitler, to cause certain people to wear yellow star badges, whom he wished to be marked by yellow star badges.

One sense in which wearing a mask could be helpful to somebody's health and wellbeing is for him/her to wear a mask, against his/her will, in attempts to avoid being threatened, or physically assaulted, by those of your Nazi leftard comrades who specialize and revel in enacting mob violence against individuals who stand out from the Nazi leftard booboisie (your crowd) by being mask-less, as non-conformists against your collectivist Nazi leftardation.

You're so amazingly abjectly stupid and slimy to be able to sit there and pretend to think that the state does not use violence, or the threat of violence, to try to get people to do things against their will.

Yeah, you sniveling, state-worshiping idiot: The state demanding that individuals must wear masks, against the individuals' wills, is the state threatening violence against individuals in order to try to achieve your Nazi leftard objective of getting everybody to wear a mask.

Wow, you really are as witless as you are tedious. What a snoozefest of self impressed ignorance, hyperbole and feeble insult.

Boring...

You really should market your posts as sleeping aids.

 

[Arthur Brain]

LOL

Yeah, that's kinda where you should just begin and end your posts...

 

[7djengo7]

Can't continue with something I've never done in the first place and is simply in the "mind" of someone who's either flat out thick, a kid in dire need of an education or a dopey troll.

On the latter, do the math. Use an abacus if it helps.

LOL @ Arthur "Hitler" Brain's persistent reliance on his fart-2-text conversion software for generating all his TOL posts.

 

[7djengo7]

Wow, you really are as witless as you are tedious. What a snoozefest of self impressed ignorance, hyperbole and feeble insult.

Boring...

You really should market your posts as sleeping aids.

Arthur Brain, try to tell us exactly how you imagine that the state can, without using violence or a threat thereof, cause people to wear masks against their will. Have fun.

 

[ok doser]

LOL @ Arthur "Hitler" Brain's persistent reliance on his fart-2-text conversion software for generating all his TOL posts.

:darwinsm:

 

[Arthur Brain]

LOL @ Arthur "Hitler" Brain's persistent reliance on his fart-2-text conversion software for generating all his TOL posts.

What a wingnut.

 

[User Name]

You know you've won the debate when all your opponent has left are insults and mockery.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Arthur Brain, try to tell us exactly how you imagine that the state can, without using violence or a threat thereof, cause people to wear masks against their will. Have fun.

You'll probably just get fined if you don't in much the same way as a load of other things that don't get your "righteous vitriol" going. Why don't you moan on about all manner of laws?

No, actually, don't bother. I don' think I could handle the excitement of another rant...

 

[Arthur Brain]

You know you've won the debate when all your opponent has left are insults and mockery.

"Debate"? If only...

Some of the flat out bat crazy around here lately is something else, and that's after years of being here...

 

[User Name]

"Debate"? If only...

Some of the flat out bat crazy around here lately is something else, and that's after years of being here...

That's because they can see the walls closing in. Hence the hysterics.

 

[7djengo7]

You know you've won the debate when all your opponent has left are insults and mockery.

I know. Well, all that Arthur Brain has had all along is nothing but insults and mockery, so, naturally, that's all he has left. Thanks for the brilliant insight!

 

[7djengo7]

Arthur Brain, try to tell us exactly how you imagine that the state can, without using violence or a threat thereof, cause people to wear masks against their will. Have fun. ​

You'll probably just get fined if you don't

Arthur Brain, try to tell us exactly how you imagine that the state can, without using violence or a threat thereof, cause people to hand over their wealth to the state against their will. Have fun.

Arthur Brain, try to tell us exactly how you imagine that the state can, without using violence or a threat thereof, cause people to wear yellow star badges against their will. Have fun.
​