The problem KR has is that we are a few of the BILLIONS who testify that we have been saved, that we have been born again....they are not just doctrines to learn but we have them now every day in our experience.
That is all you have been doing. Would you like me to post all of your insults?
You have a lot of nerve. Why don't you address the scriptures I gave about those saved already being seated with Jesus in heaven?
Jesus is God, and he came as a Son. That is in the Bible.
Stop merely insulting. You are breaking the rules to this site, and more than that, you are proving you do not have the Truth to help you defend your beliefs.
JWs think they are the ONLY true church .
JWs deny the Trinity
JWs deny the physical resurrection of Christ
JWs deny the deity of Christ
JWs deny that salvation is by Grace through faith
Thanks, KR.
What I am attempting to understand is what specifically you had previously believed about how one "gets saved" back before you "came in contact with the JWs."
You know, like "well, I believed that Christ died for my sins, and rose again for my justification" - what specifically did you believe before the JWs?
Thanks for your patience.
Yes, I believed that Christ died for my sins, and I believed that he rose again after three days, then went back to heaven.
The meaning of the word "occult" is hidden.
Did ANYONE? He has no beginning of life nor ending of life...yet you say He is not God
Yes, I believed that Christ died for my sins, and I believed that he rose again after three days, then went back to heaven.
Nay these are the teachings and surmisings of men, you can't tell the difference between man's thoughts and God's word?
Jesus said "abide in Me and I in you....the Father and I will come and take up our bode with you...the Holy Spirit will be with you and dwell in you"
If a man abide not in Me and I in him he is cast forth to wither.....
So does He not abide in you? your testimony is that He does not
Your testimony is you are not saved, you are not born again, Christ's life is not in you.
The kingdom of heaven does not come with signs to be observed [breaking of rocks etc] but it is within you.
He isn't reigning in YOU, He does reign in us for the church.
*It is very difficult to discuss something with someone who rejects out-of-hand every scripture I post. There are dozens of scriptures that show clearly that Jesus is subordinate to God (whether he is in heaven or on Earth), yet you go back to some unclear statement that could be taken more than one way, to defend your point.
There is no scripture that states that Jesus always existed. In fact, there are a few that state that he had a beginning. But, alas, you will completely twist the clear meanings of these verses and say that they do not mean what they say. The early church fathers knew that they say exactly what I have been saying that they say.
(1) "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only BEGOTTEN Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16, KJV)
"Begotten" means brought into existence; given life that he didn't have before.
(2) "No man hath seen God at any time; the only BEGOTTEN Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him." (John 1:18, KJV)
(3) "Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son; in whom we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins; who is the image of the invisible God, THE FIRST-BORN OF EVERY CREATURE." (Colossians 1:13-15, KJV)
"First-born" means the first to be born, or, brought into existence. He is in the category of a "creature," being the first one of those to be born. A creature is something created. The early church fathers recognized this and set about to try and twist it around so that no one would see the truth. They did a good job....teaching people that "first-born" and "creature" are terms that don't mean what we usually say they mean!
(4) "And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION OF GOD." (Revelation 3:14, KJV)
I find this very clear. A person may counter with "scriptures say that he created all things, so that leaves him out as a creation," but isn't it just reasonable to concede that he created all things AFTER he was brought into existence by God? He is the ONLY thing created by God alone (thus, the "only begotten Son"). Then he created all other things.
Let me get this straight. You are saying that the scriptures from Isaiah and Daniel are the "teachings and surmising of MEN"? So you disagree with Jesus himself who called the Old Testament "God's Word of truth"?
You are saying that Daniel's prophecy means nothing? Isaiah's prophecy is meaningless?
:jawdrop:
If so, then this happened.
Ephesians 1:12 That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ. 1:13 In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, 1:14 Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.
Meaning you just might be saved, but ended up confused by the Watch Tower's version of that AFTER you "were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise..."
I always try to get that clear. Everyone else just goes on the attack. Some of them simply caught up in proving others wrong as its own glory.
Anyway, if you did believe what you have just posted then you are in God's family. You are, in my book, just confused about the rest.
I say that with compassion not in scorn.
1 Corinthians 15:1 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 15:2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 15:3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 15:4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
The best to you in this - once in, ever in.
If so, then this happened.
Meaning you just might be saved, but ended up confused by the Watch Tower's version of that AFTER you "were sealed with that holy spirit of promise..."
You are not addressing anything I addressed.
It is obvious you believe John W and his followers are biblical.
You don't esteem Jesus' teachings are worthy of practicing because His word is for Jews to practice.
So, you are not biblical, either.
You are dismissing the fact Jesus gave His commission to His apostles, to teach all nations to obey His teachings.
No, not at all. I never had any anointing by the Holy Spirit. I never felt that I was destined to rule with Christ. I'm happy to stay here on Earth and enjoy Jehovah's awesome provisions for eternal life HERE.
No, not at all. I never had any anointing by the Holy Spirit. I never felt that I was destined to rule with Christ. I'm happy to stay here on Earth and enjoy Jehovah's awesome provisions for eternal life HERE.
They are NOT JohnW's followers. They agree with each other about how to deal with those they disagree with.
JohnW and they do not hold to every distinction in the same way - they are NOT his followers.
And there is a HUGE difference between being "Biblical" and being Dispensational.
You, GT, Jacob, and KR, are each being "Biblical" in each your way.
None of you are being Dispensational, however.
You each have learned, or have been taught, or figured out each your version of "one size fits all" that you each refer to as being "Biblical."
Because none of you are Dispensational; especially you.
GT and Jacob at least see some things are no longer.
I doubt you do. You strike me as someone who reads without any attempt at discerment beyond "ooo, I'm reading about Jesus..."
I don't mean that in a demeaning way. It is an observation, not a put down.
Yours appears a simple faith in God, but one without much understanding or attempt to.
Respectfully,