Again, whatever that means :idunno: - can I buy a clue?
Oh. Well, glad to know that you only believe the parts of the Bible that you agree with, instead of just believing what it teaches. :idunno:How can you believe that your Pastors, Priests were sent by God to lead us when they molested children, burned people at the stake, hunted down the folks who disagreed with them to kill them. Tried to change the Law of God and disagree with what Christ taught us? These are not God's agents friend.
Oh. Well, glad to know that you only believe the parts of the Bible that you agree with, instead of just believing what it teaches. :idunno:
Wrong friend, I believe in the entire Bible, what I do not believe is how the churches interpret it. To many pagan ideas woven into the churches in the early years.
Sent from my iPad using TOL
Who gave you permission to interpret Sacred Scripture yourself, when your interpretation differs from the Church's own interpretation? 1st Timothy 3:15 (KJV)Wrong friend, I believe in the entire Bible, what I do not believe is how the churches interpret it. To many pagan ideas woven into the churches in the early years.
TL;DR is an abbreviation of "Too long; Didn't read"
Who gave you permission to interpret Sacred Scripture yourself, when your interpretation differs from the Church's own interpretation? 1st Timothy 3:15 (KJV)
TL ; DRThe question is what 'church' do you refer too? If the RCC and her papal claims, then you hold 'tradition' on par with 'scripture' and it even has its own authority by itself, as passed down by the apostles (or so believed). The greater mystical body of Christ has many members in various denominations within traditional Christendom, and outside of the so claimed 'orthodox', since the RCC has no monopoly on 'truth'. While true devotees of Jesus may be in her organization, it is not the only community with true disciples of the Christ. Remember, Jesus said the spirit of truth would guide us.
The question is what 'church' do you refer too? If the RCC and her papal claims, then you hold 'tradition' on par with 'scripture' and it even has its own authority by itself, as passed down by the apostles (or so believed). The greater mystical body of Christ has many members in various denominations within traditional Christendom, and outside of the so claimed 'orthodox', since the RCC has no monopoly on 'truth'. While true devotees of Jesus may be in her organization, it is not the only community with true disciples of the Christ. Remember, Jesus said the spirit of truth would guide us.
You might say that, but the Church has always called him the Twelfth Apostle.
No that's Ricky.
It was too long.
Something that the Catholic faith believes and teaches also.
Except where the Church began within the lifetimes of the Apostles, and it is this Church that teaches that Paul is the Twelfth Apostle.
We all believe that.
Paul. There were and are Twelve Apostles.
False dilemma. Believe who the Bible tells us to believe, the pastors of the Church that the Lord Jesus built upon Peter.
False dilemma. Sacred Scripture tells us to believe the pastors of the Church, who are (all) men.
No disagreement.
TL ; DR
John 6:44-45 ASV
44 No man can come to me, except the Father that sent me draw him: and I will raise him up in the last day.
45 It is written in the prophets, And they shall all be taught of God.Isa 54:13, Jer 31:34 Every one that hath heard from the Father, and hath learned, cometh unto me.
Nihilo Pope Translation:
"And they shall all be taught of the Vicar of Dagon Oannes."
And of course Nihilo's popes, cardinals, bishops, and mother church claim to have the authority to change the scriptures whenever and wherever they see fit: and they did exactly that, in many places. It is nothing more than a modern Dagon-Oannes cult because they claim exclusive authority to pervert holy ancient writings which they stole from other cultures and people who existed long before they did. Nihilo does not care what the scripture actually says; that is why he beats everyone over the head with "the Catholic INTERPRETATION", for only his popes and church are allowed to interpret what the scripture says: you are not allowed to think for yourself in his cult because the TRUE ELOHIM might show you that you are enslaved in a Babylonian fertility cult.
I see One Universal Reality as the Creative Source of all life, call it 'God', 'Deity' or whatever 'name' or 'symbol' that you deem most 'suitable'. I try to look out from this Universal One, which is a universal unity, which is all pervading and all transcending at once, being that which is truly INFINITE. This 'infinity' is pure Spirit, it is pure consciousness, from whose essence all existence, all forms, all creation springs. It is One; It is All. This Deity-Source which is the Heart of all, is the essence of life itself; IT is even Nameless, because its reality is prior to words, thoughts, concepts, images, form. - of course man has given 'God' many different names, or have religious records where 'God' claims to reveal his name(s).
Now as to Jesus being YHWH, that is a matter of opinion, perspective, cult and creed. - this is why I propose on a practical level a Unitarian view, and challenge Trinitarians with what advantage, benefit or higher truth does their 'view' afford, apart from being a 'relational model', where 3 personalities exist in one essential 'Godhead'. Even from a more liberal Unitarian perspective,...the Spirit of God is the One in which the many inhere, so 'God' is still metaphysically...as a 'Manifold One',....since the multiplicity of Creation arises within the Infinity of the Creator. 'Elohim' is a plural unity, an indivisible One, yet all divisions, dualities, multiples derive their existence and generation from within the ONE. - you can cut your 'metaphysics' in so many ways,....:surf:
Always, no matter what theology or Christology you hold,...the Universal Father is the Infinite ONE, the First Source and Center of all things and beings,....nothing surpasses the PRIMACY of The FATHER, since there is no other that is the source, the Sole Progenitor of all. This Deity is INVISIBLE, as pure Spirit, Mind, Energy, Soul,...incorporeal, indivisible in essence, but multiple in form. The One can extend or divide itself into '3', '7', '12' and so on.....since all multiples derive their numerical values, equations and relations...from One ('1').
~*~*~
So how do you think your responses on the OP have done so far?
Excellent point!!!okay, whatever that stands for
Not all subscribe to your particular 'church politics or tradition' (RCC or otherwise). Don't forget the subject here is about Jesus being YHWH which many of the Unitarians have provided ample logics and 'proof-texts' to show that Jesus is not YHWH, if by 'YHWH' we mean the identity of the Father. Remember, not to confuse the persons, even though they are all 'merged' together as one ethereal essence (you know the drill). - those church fathers and others just melded together greek philosophical concepts and pagan intuitions from the schools of universal wisdom from antiquity and formulated (hypothesized) a Trinitarian compound of sorts and branded it 'orthodox', a 'creed' befitting her purposes so that the 'church' and her charter could carry on and prosper. If it works for you, go for it,...but your program, concept, or paradigm is not the only one in the cosmos 'working' so to speak. - and still John 3:16 works for everyone.
Acts 14:14
Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out,
Add the name Barnabas to the list of the apostles.
Hebrews 3:1
Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus;
Don't forget to add Christ Jesus to the list of apostles.
Who is to say that there were not many other apostles. Apostles whose names were not recorded in scripture?
You can make the word/homonym apostle mean whatever you'd like (especially in the vacuum of any historical acknowledgement of what the Church actually did, taught, and believed), but there is a particular homonym Apostle that means Twelve; there were and there are Twelve Apostles, and Paul is the Twelfth. These are those Paul mentions (including himself) in Ephesians 2:20 (KJV), and they are none other.
Nihilo, what does Acts 1:26 say?TL ; DR
Very good, and I especially like yours. But I still have a problem with the idea that the One Universal Reality that I call God---being pure Spirit (as in "unadulterated") and from whom everything exists---can truly be pure and "one" (as in one set of truthful realities) if He accepts any and all of men's ideas, whether true or false. How can He say it's all right to believe in a literal hell-fire, and it's also OK to believe there's not one? How can it be all right with Him that men call Him kind and loving and it's also OK if men think of him as brutish and maniacal? He takes ANYTHING? I believe He has one set of standards, to which He desires all to adhere.
I also don't think that He is necessarily keen on dividing Himself into any number. The Scripture says He is "One" and He is YHWH. And He says: "O if only you would actually pay attention to my commandments! Then your peace would become just like a river, and your righteousness like the waves of the sea." (Is.48:18) If He accepts ANYTHING, then what is He talking about there---paying attention to HIS commandments? Is He commanding that everyone do his own thing? And if He is, then why is He lamenting the fact that people are not paying attention?