Isn't it reasonable to doubt Young Earth Creationism?
- Thread starter Vulcan Logician
- Start date
So you are not going to even try to explain what process created the radio active elements in the crust? Tell me, if you will not or can not explain your views, why should anybody listen to anything you say?
What is most interesting about Walt's hypothesis is that they require that God's act of creation was not completed by the sixth day. Radioactive elements, meteors, and comets were all created thousands of years after God's completed act of creation on day 6. DOesn't seem like Walt is doing a very god job of explaining how creation happened in 6 days if somethings weren't created until the thousands of years later.
If you cared, you would have read the link that you were given.
You shouldn't listen. You should put me on ignore and never mention me again. :up:
I don't care what you believe. I'm looking for a rational discussion of ideas. However, your sole ambition is to disagree with anything that denies your precious Darwinism.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Try googling piezoelectricity.
Talk about a straw man.
No, not created. Formed, as a result of a world wide natural disaster.
Straw man.
The problem with that is that you have no idea what a rational conversation is. It is not rational to agree with everything you say or everything I say. It is rational to discuss the differences. It is not rational to insult people simply because they don't agree with you.
I did. I saw what Walt said and I saw other research on the subject. I am not convinced that piezoelectric electric effects create sufficient energy to fuse atoms.
Ah, equivocation. Always a good response when you cant address the point raised head on.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
That we have learned to estimate the apparent age of the universe, tells us how much work God did in creating everything. He did over 13 billion years of work in just six days!
and yet he did it in such a manner that he had to redo the earth within a few thousand years
In day one God said..."Let there be light." Radiation began. This is why there are radio active elements in all matter. Radiometric dating traces backward to when God created light.
https://science.howstuffworks.com/radiation.htm
It might be interesting to note that Dr Wiens, the author of "radiometric dating from Christian perspective" was also the primary scientist for the Genesis Project, which captured and measured solar winds to trace back to the moment of God's creation of the universe.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
He did it in such a way that permits us to freely disbelieve in Him, no matter how advanced our science becomes, year after year, in characterizing His handiwork.
Science actually points us toward God. We know there is a creator because of the amazing and intricate design he has woven.
The reason why there are many godless scientists is that humans are born in rebellion to God. Many are looking for a way to hide and avoid God. This is the nature of humans who are unreconciled to God.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Speaking of which, who are you? Who have you been? This isn't your first rodeo at TOL.
That is really not responsive to my comment.
This is the first time on this site. No other names have been used.
This makes me laugh. I post that science points toward God and share about radiation being in the very first moment of God's creation. Then, I get posters who avoid the data, but speculate about myself. Is this a general tactic at theology online or is it specific of a few posters when they struggle with the topic?
In any case, don't let your hearts be troubled. I am brand new to theology online. I have posted for awhile on Christian Haven so sharing my views is not new.
In any case, I enjoy discussing the glory of God. If that bothers you, I make no apologies.