Is White Privilege Real?

[Arthur Brain]

[For the time being doser becomes a momentary and uncharacteristic Boy-Scout]

:salute:

Yes sir! .....and don't drink and drive boys!

:rotfl:

:thumb:

 

[7djengo7]

Sez the white Irish guy. What a temporary nuisance this must be for him! :carryon:

When you say, "Sez the white Irish guy", do you mean that what the guy (one, Rogan O'Handley), quoted in ok doser 's post, says--viz., that BLM is NOT raising millions of dollars to be used for rebuilding hurricane-destroyed homes and businesses owned by blacks in Louisiana--do you mean that what he is saying is false, and that, on the contrary BLM IS actually doing that?

Here's a true-or-false question for you to enjoy stonewalling against, you beyond-merely-human-help stoner:

True or False: BLM has been raising millions of dollars for the purpose of rebuilding--and has been applying its energy and labor toward working to rebuild--black-owned homes and businesses destroyed by the hurricane?

 

[7djengo7]

Not at all....part Irish meself.

Are you really this desperate?

As desperate as you are? Of course I'm not as desperate as you are. You're obviously very desperate, indeed. Since I'm not desperate at all, obviously I'm not as desperate as you are.

 

[7djengo7]

Oh, 414 times. I even counted them.

Otherwise, nope.

:e4e:

It's hilarious that you have talked yourself into thinking that a hyphen ( - ) is not actually needed to form the compound adjective, 'drug-addled'.

L:e4e:L

 

[ok doser]

It's hilarious that you have talked yourself into thinking that a hyphen ( - ) is not actually needed to form the compound adjective, 'drug-addled'.

L:e4e:L

Now to be fair, artie is suffering from ARBD

aka drug-addled

 

[Arthur Brain]

It's hilarious that you have talked yourself into thinking that a hyphen ( - ) is not actually needed to form the compound adjective, 'drug-addled'.

L:e4e:L

Oh, it's such a grammatical laugh riot...

 

[Arthur Brain]

Now to be fair, artie is suffering from ARBD

aka drug-addled

:rotfl:

The drink driving little troll strikes again!

You really are, in the literal sense of the word, retarded.

Oh, the irony...

 

[7djengo7]

I taught 12 year olds. 7th grade. They could be fun in a classroom if they were kept busy. When they were bored the childish behaviors would surface. None of them were morons.

Unlike you and I, Arthur Brain thinks that to be 12 years old is to be a moron. Otherwise, he would not consider saying to someone, "Are you 12 years old?", as saying something synonymous with, "You are a moron!"

 

[ok doser]

Unlike you and I, Arthur Brain thinks that to be 12 years old is to be a moron. Otherwise, he would not consider saying to someone, "Are you 12 years old?", as saying something synonymous with, "You are a moron!"

artie is a creature to be pitied and ultimately, left behind

 

[Arthur Brain]

Unlike you and I, Arthur Brain thinks that to be 12 years old is to be a moron. Otherwise, he would not consider saying to someone, "Are you 12 years old?", as saying something synonymous with, "You are a moron!"

Hmm, no. There are many twelve year old children who are far more intelligent than both you and doser put together.

:e4e:

 

[Arthur Brain]

artie is a creature to be pitied and ultimately, left behind

:rotfl:

Says the guy who followed me around even when he knew he was on ignore...

(Can't make this stuff up...)

 

[7djengo7]

Hmm, no. There are many twelve year old children who are far more intelligent than both you and doser put together.

:e4e:

No, what? Your "no", here, is in response to what? What are you denying, or pretending to deny, here, by saying "no"?

 

[quip]

As desperate as you are? Of course I'm not as desperate as you are. You're obviously very desperate, indeed. Since I'm not desperate at all, obviously I'm not as desperate as you are.

.....obviously.

 

[Arthur Brain]

No, what? Your "no", here, is in response to what? What are you denying, or pretending to deny, here, by saying "no"?

Hmm, response even referenced in quoted reply.

Erm, nope, not in the mood for your whacko stuff tonight thanks!

:e4e:

 

[Arthur Brain]

.....obviously.

It's sadly hysterical isn't it?

:chuckle:

 

[quip]

I was for years as a child a boy scout. When my sons were of the appropriate age I was a scout leader. So yes my identification with scouting is strong. I was involved in scouting for nineteen years.

Thus, you take your view of cops a'la Mayberry RFD?

 

[7djengo7]

Hmm, response even referenced in quoted reply.

By your "no", then, you were denying that you think that to be 12 years old is to be a moron?

If so, you've obviously, recently changed your mind, since, before, you obviously did think that to be 12 years old is to be a moron.

When, in your rage, you said to me, "Are you 12?", what did you mean by that, if not "You are a moron!"?

Erm, nope, not in the mood for your whacko stuff tonight thanks!

:e4e:

Too bad for you, I guess, that I don't wait upon whether or not you are in the mood for me to criticize your drug-addled, raving stupidities, eh?

L:e4e:L

 

[Arthur Brain]

By your "no", then, you were denying that you think that to be 12 years old is to be a moron?

If so, you've obviously, recently changed your mind, since, before, you obviously did think that to be 12 years old is to be a moron.

When, in your rage, you said to me, "Are you 12?", what did you mean by that, if not "You are a moron!"?



Too bad for you, I guess, that I don't wait upon whether or not you are in the mood for me to criticize your drug-addled, raving stupidities, eh?

L:e4e:L

Well, that was a fun read...

 

[7djengo7]

.....obviously.

I'd say that you should try writing on TOL sometimewhile NOT stoned, except for my understanding of the fact that, whether you're stoned or not while writing on TOL, it's not going to make any difference for the better to your posts; because, even while you're writing not-stoned, nevertheless, the permanent damage that you've done to your drug-addled mind by your having been stoned in the past obviously cannot but make itself manifest in your TOL ravings.

 

[quip]

I'd say that you should try writing on TOL sometimewhile NOT stoned, except for my understanding of the fact that, whether you're stoned or not while writing on TOL, it's not going to make any difference for the better to your posts; because, even while you're writing not-stoned, nevertheless, the permanent damage that you've done to your drug-addled mind by your having been stoned in the past obviously cannot but make itself manifest in your TOL ravings.

:cloud9:.. dude.....you're like killin' my vibe man! Quit being such a square.