Don't be silly. Recognizing the dangers to young people from the covid vaccines does not mean anyone hates either Biden or Trump. That is a ridiculous stretch of attempted logic and should be rejected as such.
Is there a risk of death from the covid vaccine?
- Thread starter marke
- Start date
Young people should have a greater fear of the vaccine which has killed or seriously damaged young people than they should fear the virus that has rarely killed or permanently damaged young people. And those older adults who fear the virus worse than death should get vaccinated so they can stop worrying about catching it and dying. If young people refuse to get the virus they will hurt none of those who get the vaccine, so let people get the vaccine or not get the vaccine as their free choice.One peer-reviewed article is one more than you have to back up your nonsense!!!!!
But according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), over the summer, in the United States, people under age 30 accounted for more than 20% of COVID-19 cases and were seen as more likely to transmit the virus than others. This trend has continued into the fall.
Coronavirus infections requiring hospitalization are not only possible in younger adults, but the rate of these cases is increasing as the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus continues to spread.
Coronavirus and COVID-19: Younger Adults Are at Risk, Too
Early reports indicated that young people were more likely to have milder cases of the disease. But that view may be changing.www.hopkinsmedicine.org
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Been batting 1000 so far with the virus
I am in my upper 60s. I got covid, as did my wife of the same age, and we recovered, thank God. But we will not follow men like Hank Aaron and get the vaccine because, as Bible-believing Christians, we do not fear death or covid.
To hide the fact he's drooling.
Derf
Well-known member
From loss of fine motor control, or loss of fine moral control?To hide the fact he's drooling.
way 2 go
Well-known member
2 days ago ... So far, more than 44.5 million people have had a first vaccine dose - about 85% of the adult population - and almost 33 million have had a second
last 3 days over 20,000 cases of wuflu per day , most are delta scariant
less than 25 deaths per day
btw : avg deaths per day in the uk is 1,643 or 600,000ish per year
way 2 go
Well-known member
The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations.
5. Conclusions
The present assessment raises the question whether it would be necessary to rethink policies and use COVID-19 vaccines more sparingly and with some discretion only in those that are willing to accept the risk because they feel more at risk from the true infection than the mock infection. Perhaps it might be necessary to dampen the enthusiasm by sober facts? In our view, the EMA and national authorities should instigate a safety review into the safety database of COVID-19 vaccines and governments should carefully consider their policies in light of these data. Ideally, independent scientists should carry out thorough case reviews of the very severe cases, so that there can be evidence-based recommendations on who is likely to benefit from a SARS-CoV2 vaccination and who is in danger of suffering from side effects. Currently, our estimates show that we have to accept four fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2–11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations, placing risks and benefits on the same order of magnitude.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
... would in the past have led to an immediate halt in vaccinations
See here: https://retractionwatch.com/2021/06...-prevented-cases-earns-expression-of-concern/
Also, a little background on your source is in order: "MDPI, a publisher of open-access scientific journals...is primarily based in China..." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MDPI
Since when did China become an authoritative source for information about Covid-19 to you?
Last edited:
Retraction watch is not free from undue influence from the pharma and vaccine industries.
From the article you posted:
Christian Drosten's proposal/study to the German government for PCR tests was accepted overnight without any comments, pro or negative. That is against German law. The PCR test is NEVER to be used as a diagnostic disease test according to Cary Mullis the inventor of the test. Also, according to Mullis, it is not to be used above a cycle threshold of 20. It is commonly used at cycle thresholds above 30 to test for the coronavirus. And at cycles above 30 false positives are the norm, not the exception.
That is exactly the opposite of which retractionwatch endorses. And they cite Eurosurveillance's rejection of the Corman-Drosten report as a good thing.
So, retractionwatch adds it's influence to stop the truth of the testing fraud from becoming common knowledge. They are putting their oars into the water in favor of falsehood and against truth. Also, when "fact checkers" come out in favor of some other "fact checking" site it's self-promoting bias. Especially when virtually every "fact checker" has a massive leftist bias. In fact, they all get together at least once a year to discuss what they are going to "fact check" and how. They are anything but unbiased and truthful. So when "fact checkers" endorse retractionwatch, I get suspicious as that group is very left wing oriented.
As to MDPI and open-access publishing the more decentralization the less control over content. You also "forget" to mention their offices in Basel, Switzerland. The very concept of open source publishing removes a lot of government and corporate control over what gets published. So of course, as those two entities have a lot of control over what is not published in open-access journals and the press they are going to be highly critical of open-access publishing. They want to keep their control over what gets published and destroy all open-access publishing which gives much greater access to those who desire to be published.
way 2 go
Well-known member
you didn't refute the conclusion
Founded 1996
Country of origin
Switzerland
Headquarters location Basel, Switzerland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MDPI
they don't like the conclusion
Status Active
Founded 1996
Country of origin
Switzerland
Headquarters location Basel, Switzerland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MDPI
"primarily based in China..." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MDPI
"Israel’s Ministry of Health is now evaluating a possible link between the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine and reports of heart inflammation, a condition called myocarditis. So far, most cases have been mild and have occurred in men aged between 16 and 19."
www.nature.com
Six months of COVID vaccines: what 1.7 billion doses have taught scientists
At a pivotal moment in the pandemic, Nature explores key questions about the vaccines that countries are racing to deliver while viral variants spread around the globe.
But under the direct control the headquarters based in Switzerland. Your deceptions are once again very transparent. So what if papers are published in China when the criteria for publishing is under the control of those outside of China? Your arguments are deceptive.
Your arguments are primarily based in China. So there.
And that has taken place in a half a year. Most serious problems with vaccines really begin to show up a year or more after vaccination. So, you're pointing to very incomplete information and claiming it's absolute truth. Another deception. Doesn't truth matter to you at all?"Israel’s Ministry of Health is now evaluating a possible link between the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine and reports of heart inflammation, a condition called myocarditis. So far, most cases have been mild and have occurred in men aged between 16 and 19."
Six months of COVID vaccines: what 1.7 billion doses have taught scientists
At a pivotal moment in the pandemic, Nature explores key questions about the vaccines that countries are racing to deliver while viral variants spread around the globe.
The link between mrna vaccines and myocarditis isn't "suspected". It's proven. Since the vaccinations started the rate of myocarditis showing up in teenage males has increased 250% after decades of maintaining the same numbers year after year. And the spike proteins have been conclusively proven to accumulate in the heart, lungs, and reproductive organs. None of that is speculation. What you're posting is nothing but speculation.
And your arguments are primarily based in deception and stupidity.