ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
What a mind numbing troll anna is to start a dopey thread like this
:thumb:
What a mind numbing troll anna is to start a dopey thread like this
You can thank your fellow feminists for that.It's rather telling that anyone would see marriage as an issue of control rather than a relationship between the marital partners.
Ten bucks he says either a deist or Buddhist.
This is so weird. Mosey back into the forum to see what I've been missing and what do I find? This.
Good work humanity.
This is so weird. Mosey back into the forum to see what I've been missing and what do I find? This.
Good work humanity.
:idunno:Not bionically.
Indeed ... be sure to check out the other couple of threads where a few select members discuss the *deservedness* of rape victims.
but but but
then i can't claim my wife raped me when we had sex and i was too incapacitated by alcohol to give consent
no fair
Silly me, seeing the word "deservedness" and assuming it had something to do with salvation or whatever.
smdh
Yeah, well little pitchers have big ears.....and big mouths, so you'll be seeing Anna, Rusha, Bybee, and their little boy eunuchs who follow after them, throwing it in your face for years to come. Only the juicy parts, of course.Its too late. I already took the bait and spewed more personal information than he deserved.
actually, it has to do with reaping what you sow
so yeah, it does have to do with salvation
Too bad.
The definition comes from common law held in the United States before 1960, and is the basic definition for rape that has been carried from Roman common law through Brittish common law into American common law.
So, it is a definition that has stood the test of time.
This could get a little off-topic, but what does salvation have to do with reaping and sowing? Are you suggesting some kind of works-based model?
Then that would be ten bucks you've just lost.
Like I said earlier in this thread.kinda like the definition of "marriage"
and look what's happened to that
Like I said earlier in this thread.
The redefinition of rape to include this new concept of "marital rape" is an attack on the institution of marriage.
It's typical for otherwise UK atheists to be Buddhists or, if not atheistic, deistic. I suppose it's supposed to fill the spiritual void of a universe coming from a ten dimensional bean.
Is marital rape scripturally defensible?