Same soundbytes and cliches, no need to even read them.
In other words, you cannot refute the logic?
I am going to get you kidnapped and deprogrammed from your sects.
:noid:
Same soundbytes and cliches, no need to even read them.
Rejecting your two gospel circ vs uncirc theory is not rejecting the gospel....None of us follow your circ gospel (which is a false vs true gospel).
Same soundbytes and cliches, no need to even read them.
The person and work of Christ is the Pauline gospel. MAD arbitrarily, nonsensically divides this.
Jesus left more commentary than necessary to show the disciples that He was the lamb of God that died for the sins of the world, whose blood justifies all those who believe on Him.
Jesus left more commentary than necessary to show the disciples that He was the lamb of God that died for the sins of the world, whose blood justifies all those who believe on Him.
And again, this meaning was hidden from them, and they did not know until Paul.
Acts 10
Not so Lord!
You can't change the facts of the Bible.
And again, this meaning was hidden from them, and they did not know until Paul.
Acts 10
Not so Lord!
You can't change the facts of the Bible.
Where did Peter preach that Christ died for our sins in Acts 2?Acts 2 mentions the Messiahship, Lordship, death, resurrection of Christ, core gospel truths affirmed by Paul.
A Judaizer false gospel that you call a true circ gospel is impossible in light of His finished work on the cross.
Acts 2 mentions the Messiahship, Lordship, death, resurrection of Christ, core gospel truths affirmed by Paul.
Where do we find that?
Where did Peter preach that Christ died for our sins in Acts 2?
Where did Peter preach that Christ was raised again for our justification in Acts 2?
Acts 21:20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law:
Of course you left out the heart and soul of the gospel Paul preached. H.A. Ironside, a well known Acts 2 dispensationalist (and chief critic of MAD), says the following about the "gospel" which we are to preach today:
"All through those OT dispensations, the gospel was predicted, and when Jesus came, the gospel came with Him. When He died, when He was buried, and when He rose again, the gospel could be fully told out to a poor lost world. Observe, it says, 'that Christ died for our sins.' No man preaches the gospel, no matter what nice things he may say about Jesus, if he leaves out His vicarious death on Calvary's Cross" [emphasis added] (Ironside, God's Unspeakable Gift [London: Pickering & Inglis, 1908], Chapter 2).
The gospel which was preached on the Day of Pentecost said nothing about about the "vicarious death on Calvary's Cross."
So according to Ironside the gospel for today was not preached on the day of Pentecost. But of course this is way above your head. You are so foolish that you think that the "good news" that Christ died for our sins is the same "good news" that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.
You are misusing a MAD critic to promote MAD?
Pentecost was a simple sermon rooted in the person and work of Christ.
Prove it.
We have an uninterrupted sermon preached by Peter on the day of Pentecost beginning at Acts 2:14 and ending at Acts 2:36. In that sermon there is not a word about God's "grace" and there is not a word about the purpose of the Lord Jesus' death on the Cross.
Despite this many were saved and then baptized with water after hearing Peter's sermon.
No one on this forum is as foolish as you are, and you prove it over and over again by insisting that the "good news" that Christ died for our sins is the same "good news" that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God.
Do you never tire of making a fool out of yourself?
These were the prophecies concerning WHY Jesus had to suffer and die - the burning question that was foremost on the disciples' minds. Twice in Luke 24 it states how Jesus went through the Law, prophets and Psalms to explain why He had to suffer. It was a comprehensive overview and in all those scriptures the reasons were clearly explained.
The particular passage I quoted, Isaiah 53, was only one of many. It speaks of our having obtained healing , the forgiveness of sins, justification and peace with God. This teaching did not go over their heads. Jesus made sure of that when He opened their eyes and gave them spiritual insight into what He was saying.
LUKE 24
10 But the LORD was pleased
To crush Him, putting Him to grief;
If He would render Himself as a guilt offering,
He will see His offspring,
He will prolong His days,
And the good pleasure of the LORD will prosper in His hand.
11 As a result of the anguish of His soul,
He will see it and be satisfied;
By His knowledge the Righteous One,
My Servant, will justify the many,
As He will bear their iniquities.
According to the Bible Jesus went through these and many other scriptures giving the Apostles spiritual understanding.