Mr. Raven wrote:
Where does the Father ever say He is not God?
Now, by the pronoun, 'He', I take it Mr. Raven was referring to Jesus, inasmuch as he was responding to your assertion that "Jesus is not God". In other words, he was confronting you with the rhetorical question: "Where does the Father ever say Jesus is not God?"
In responding to what Mr. Raven wrote, you said:
By this, did you
not mean, "Does the Father have to say that Jesus is not God?"
At least you admit that you did not receive your doctrine (that Jesus is not God) from God. That's Bright Raven's point:
you didn't get your doctrine (that Jesus is not God) from the Bible. Now, here is just one of many, many Bible verses in which God does not affirm your doctrine (that Jesus is not God):
Mark 1:1 KJV The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. |
By admitting, what you and I both know, that God never says that Jesus is not God, you are admitting that, in Mark 1:1 KJV, by affirming Jesus Christ to be the Son of God, God is NOT affirming that Jesus is not God.
So, when you write:
There is an abundance of scripture that identifies Jesus Christ to be the son of God.
...what's your point? Every Christian believes Jesus is the Son of God, and, apparently, as exemplified by you, some anti-Christians profess to believe that Jesus is the Son of God. Anyway, the truth you admit--that God never says that Jesus is not God--necessarily entails that, in every, single passage of Scripture in which God "identifies Jesus Christ to be the son of God", one thing He is NOT saying, therein, is that Jesus is not God.
God is the author of scripture, not me.
Since, as you admit, God, the Author of Scripture, never says that Jesus is not God, please tell us
whence you derive your extra-Biblical doctrine that Jesus is not God.
Who is the author of your doctrine that Jesus is not God?
Instead of finding excuses for not believing the scriptures, why not seek to learn to believe what is written and quit stewing about what is not written?
We observe your admission that, so long as one believes that Jesus is not God, he/she is believing something that God never said, never wrote. Amen! Now, the doctrine you believe, and cherish--that Jesus is not God--is, as you say, "not written"; at least, it's
not written in Scripture--it's
not written by God. So, by your own admission, you are all about promulgating an un-Scriptural doctrine, so long as you are promulgating the doctrine that Jesus is not God.
Since, as you admit, God never said that Jesus is not God, why, then, do
you say that Jesus is not God? Since you admit that
God doesn't say that Jesus is not God, please tell us
who, or what, you consider to be your "authority" for believing the un-Scriptural doctrine that Jesus is not God.
How important would you say it is for people to believe your un-Scriptural doctrine, that Jesus is not God? Would you say it is an offense to God for people to neglect to believe your admittedly un-Scriptural doctrine, that Jesus is not God?
Since God, as you admit, never said that Jesus is not God, what complaint would He have against those who refuse to believe your doctrine that Jesus is not God?
He is not "God the Son" a term that scripture never uses to describe Jesus Christ.
- Jesus, the Son of God, is, indeed, God the Son.
- So far as I can tell, Scripture never uses the phrase, "Jesus the man". Only a fool would say that, that being the case, it must follow that Jesus is not man. Just the same, only a fool could think, or pretend to think, that absence, in Scripture, of the phrase, "God the Son", entails that Jesus, the Son of God, is not God.
Again, you're admitting that you believe a doctrine that is NOT taught in Scripture: that Jesus is not God the Son. But, since, being a non-Christian, you're so arrogantly self-righteous, you're eager to cavil against Christians because they refuse to join you in your belief of that un-Scriptural falsehood.