genuineoriginal
New member
The definitions are not legit as proven by the actual words from Strong's and Vine's, so your assurances are meaningless.I can assure you the definitions I'm presenting for pisteuo are legit .
The definitions are not legit as proven by the actual words from Strong's and Vine's, so your assurances are meaningless.I can assure you the definitions I'm presenting for pisteuo are legit .
Trust follows truth.
You are making Mennosota look good by comparison... and that's not a compliment.
The definitions are not legit as proven by the actual words from Strong's and Vine's, so your assurances are meaningless.
The verses say (in plain modern English):
Salvation is a result of God being delighted to honor people that have merited it by pleasing Him through their faith.
Salvation is not given to you for your sake, but your salvation is a gift God gives to Himself.
Salvation is not a debt God is obligated to pay for your works, so you can't boast that it was your works that saved you.
The main difference I see is whether it is God saves us for His own pleasure or whether God is obligated to repay us for our efforts.I hope you won't mind that I also differentiated two separate statements in green and blue. Perhaps you'll forgive me that I'm in some difficulty parsing what you've posted in those in any way in which they don't directly contradict each other, in my view;
Works is doing all those things we are commanded to do and there is no reason for us to expect any praise for doing what we are obligated to do.and I think maybe that's a large part of the issue here - a difference both in defining what constitutes works
Luke 17:7-10 7 [JESUS]But which of you, having a servant plowing or feeding cattle, will say unto him by and by, when he is come from the field, Go and sit down to meat?[/JESUS] 8 [JESUS]And will not rather say unto him, Make ready wherewith I may sup, and gird thyself, and serve me, till I have eaten and drunken; and afterward thou shalt eat and drink?[/JESUS] 9 [JESUS]Doth he thank that servant because he did the things that were commanded him? I trow not.[/JESUS] 10 [JESUS]So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.[/JESUS] |
Matthew 25:21 21 [JESUS]His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord.[/JESUS] |
Yes, I believe that the Scriptures say something different about the nature of God, man, sin and evil, and what God does in response to willful disobedience, than Calvinism/Reformed claim the Scriptures say., as well as what we preceive Holy Scripture systematically delineates regarding the nature of God, the nature of man, the nature of sin and evil, and God's rescuing of us from our own willful disobedience.
I have no doubts that there are Christians in almost every Christian denomination that have the faith that God is looking for, despite any differences in the teachings of those denominations.I still persistently think there's more on which we agree than disagree.
Your choice .
What are the chances that you are mistaking comments about the definitions for the definitions themselves?Well AMR found the " a personal surrender to Him and a life inspired by such surrender ," was in the Vines just like I said it was .
What do you think the chances are my other findings in the Strongs are also there ?
100%
What are the chances that you are mistaking comments about the definitions for the definitions themselves?
100%
Yep, there are lots of comments intermingled therein.
So is AMR a liar also ? He validated the Vines for you .
What are the chances that you are mistaking comments about the definitions for the definitions themselves?
100%
Pisteuo is " a personal surrender to Him and a life inspired by such surrender ."
A neutral third party found out that there is an edition of Strong's that has the comments you have mistakenly thought were definitions.The fact a neutral third party has found what I've referenced makes you a dishonest reporter .
A neutral third party found out that there is an edition of Strong's that has the comments you have mistakenly thought were definitions.
That does not prove you are right, that proves you are wrong.
Find out what the difference is between an author's (or editor's) comments about a definition and the actual definition.
Take your time.
I am sure it will take you a while.
A neutral third party found out that there is an edition of Strong's that has the comments you have mistakenly thought were definitions.
That does not prove you are right, that proves you are wrong.
Find out what the difference is between an author's (or editor's) comments about a definition and the actual definition.
Take your time.
I am sure it will take you a while.
Let's be precise when appealing to what I found:Well AMR found the " a personal surrender to Him and a life inspired by such surrender ," was in the Vines just like I said it was .
What do you think the chances are my other findings in the Strongs are also there ?
100%
Let's be precise when appealing to what I found:
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?p=5277291#post5277291
As I indicated, the verbatim phrase "a personal surrender to Him and a life inspired by such surrender" does not appear in Vines. Rather it is part of a threefold enumerated list that you are simply combining while eliminating the (1) phrase and ignoring the caution that how phrases (1), (2), and (3) are to be amplified over one another...that is, by the context in which they are being used. Your phrasing is quite different from the way it appears in Vines.
The added issue for Strong's 4100, etc., is that you are relying upon an enhancement to Strong's proper:
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?130626-Is-Calvinism-Wrong&p=5277326&viewfull=1#post5277326
Just ensure that in the future when you are appealing to "Strong's" that you qualify that appeal with a citation of the emended version you are actually using.
AMR
Such brilliance. Teach us....Please?
I take that as a compliment, as you are not in my league, quite irrelevant on TOL:
Your "page:"This page has had had 166 visits
Vs.
The great saint John W's:
This page has had 16,773 visits
Contrasts.
Thanks again!
Get saved.
PS: You're a clown, making Howdy Doody look good.
So there.
Fun!
Works is doing all those things we are commanded to do and there is no reason for us to expect any praise for doing what we are obligated to do.
Faith (faithfulness) goes beyond merely doing all those things we are commanded to do and it is up to our Lord to decide whether He is pleased with it enough to praise us and/or reward us for it.
Actually, if you go back and re-read it is wrong in Strong's when you attempt to turn a dictionary into a lexicon.You made yourself clear when you called the Strongs " the wrongs " . You can explain away those definitions if you like , that's your choice
Would you mind putting your understanding of how Pisteuo is applied on the table to be tested , from the very beginning of the salvation process ? After we are called by the Father . You words , your understanding , your experience .
Faith is the practice of our belief, works are the fruits and outwards evidence of our faith. As the thawing of the winter brings forth green leaves, the green leaves are outwards fruits and evidence of the spring season.