"Believed in" what? Religion? If I have faith in God, and in the power of God's divine love to heal us and save us from ourselves, what do I need to believe in some religion for? Who do you think I need to "obey"? I can simply choose to live by that ideal of salvation by divine love that I've put my faith in. No "obedience" is needed. No religion, either.
Your faith in God is a religion. It seems to have become popular for people to hold religious beliefs and then turn around and try to draw illusory distinctions between their belief in God, the supernatural, etc. versus others religious beliefs - claiming that their beliefs aren't "religious," as if it were a dirty word. Robert Pate is one on here who constantly attacks "religion" - but, as with everyone who fallaciously joins this line of reasoning, he simply constructs a straw-man which he identifies as "religion" and attacks it. Religion is very diverse and abstract, encompassing all manners of belief and practice. You might criticize this or that sect or specific religion, but it is quite difficult to pin-down and address religion as a whole.
Refuse to obey whom? God? God has given me a choice: to live by faith in His divine love to heal and save us from ourselves, or to live in fear and selfishness all my life. "Obedience" isn't on the menu. It's only religion that thinks obedience has anything to do with anything. And that's because authoritarian religionists keep trying to pretend that their religion IS GOD! So they can control everyone through fear and this obsession with blind obedience. Religion is not my God. Religion saves no one. It only traps people in their own delusions of righteousness and some 'magical' salvation in the hereafter.
You lack understanding. Love and faith are not contrary to obedience - but rather establish obedience to the Law. We obey not because of fear, but because we love God and our fellow man. We recognize that all the various commandments like do not murder, do not steal, make disciples, etc. are for our benefit and the benefit of those we love. By doing what is right and good, we can live in peace and harmony with one another, resolve conflicts, build each other up, and prosper as a whole. When someone is in need, you help them because you care about their well-being. You reach out to the lost of society so that they maybe brought back, and reconciled with God and man. etc.
While a healthy 'fear'/respect for God is a wise thing, that is not the fundamental basis of the commandments or the reason for our obedience. Rather, as Christ taught, everything rests upon love as its basis. Don't obey because of fear, obey because of love. This is what it means to set your heart and mind on the Spirit. When you make love the center of everything, the Law is not a burden to keep, but is quite natural. If you live for yourself, for worldly desires, then the Law is contrary to your heart and mind and it is impossible for you.
That's true. More true of religionists, though, who claim that God is love, and that love heals, but then immediately fall into religious idolization and false threats whenever they're challenged to act on it. Anyone can proclaim faith in some ideal, but faith is not the proclamation of the ideal, it's the acting on it. It's the living by it. An this is what so many religionists don't want to admit to, because they aren't willing to actually do it. So instead, they proclaim that faith is just the proclamation. Not the acting on it. That way they can excuse themselves for not living by it. And they can falsely convince themselves faith is "believing" instead of DOING. And many manifestations of organized religions promote this dishonest nonsense because they want to be the "divine authority": the stand-ins for God in people's lives. They're not interested in healing people through divine love, they're more interested in controlling people through blind obedience to their dictates. And so that's what you see all these religionists here on TOL preaching: blind obedience to the false God of religious authority. And "faith" as a proclamation, instead of action.
I agree with the sentiment, but must disagree with the use of the term "religionists" to describe this group of people. This is true of some religious groups, not of religion as a whole or even in general. I am religious and I'm most certainly not of that mindset - hence this thread.
The only people who are ignorant of the healing and saving power of divine love are people who, very sadly, have not experienced it. It is our responsibility to show them that love, so they can experience it for themselves, and will see that it is an option for them to live by, if they so choose. If believing in some religion helps us to do that, fine. But all too often, religion becomes "God" unto itself, and becomes obsessed with "obedience" to itself, and shows no love, mercy, or healing, at all.
Again - when you start trying to narrowly define religion like this, you are simply setting up a straw-man. Religion is too diverse. Different religions have different values, end-goals/dreams, etc. They most certainly don't all have love as their basis - few do in fact. Of the major religions I've studied only the Abrahamic Faiths do so, and then Christianity is the most explicit about it.
But yes, it is our responsibility to show them that love, to teach it too them. But love, properly understood, is not some emotional feeling. It is a matter of what you value and how you act upon those values. Namely: valuing the well-being of others, even over your own well-being. It means you try to live in harmony and peace with others, and seek reconciliation when conflict arises, but also are willing to fight and to die to when necessary. The greatest act of love is to give your life to save another. When start applying these principles to the various facets of life and carrying them through to their logical conclusions - you get God's Law. Love is the abstract principle, whereas individual commandments are the application thereof.