Mary Contrary 999
Active member
BetterSilly girls
BetterSilly girls
Nope, not banned:Town Heretic -- appeals to authority (and is dead*)
*/** Euphemism for banned
Why do you persist here? And I do mean you behind the user name.Nope, not banned:
Like so many others who used to be active on this forum, he just no longer chooses to waste his time with you.
They're... females?Care to rephrase that.
When asked to present proof of billions of years the overwhelming majority of Americans will admit they cannot do that. When asked to explain why they believe the earth is billions of years old they can only reply something like "I believe what he said."Yes. Most definitely. The following people can:
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Richard Dawkins
Daniel Dennett
Greg Graffin
Steven Pinker
Matt Ridley
Carl Sagan
Peter Atkins
Robert Ardrey
Bill Nye, the Science Guy
Walter White aka Heisenberg
You have provided names of people who parrot erroneous old earth narratives, but who fail to prove those narratives are true.Are you retarded? You asked about people: "Can anyone?" and people have names.
A woman takes the lead from he husband but that doesn't make them idiots.They're... females?
What am I doing wrong here? They can't present a coherent scientific position.
Are you trying to say that there are no women that are idiots? That would be wrong.A woman takes the lead from he husband but that doesn't make them idiots.
I am not trying to say anything. I made a general statement. A scientifically minded individual would get that. Are you male or female?Are you trying to say that there are no women that are idiots? That would be wrong.
It does if their husbands are idiots.A woman takes the lead from he husband but that doesn't make them idiots.
Indeed, so general that it meant nothing.I am not trying to say anything. I made a general statement.
False claim.A scientifically minded individual would get that.
What difference does it make in this situation?Are you male or female?
Same with evolutionists.OK, to make it clear: Chicks (generally) suck at logic and science.
No way. My evidence is personal experience, plus an article of faith, that women, men and intersex people are all human beings, and human beings are almost basically "wired" for logic. The uniformly agreed-to goal of science is to avoid being illogical in the pursuit of knowledge. The only way that human beings can function as biochemical organisms is if we are almost basically "wired" logically. This organization extends to our brains. Training in logic is natural and for all those who aren't obstinate, it is possible to bring our minds into better conformity with logic. There is no limit to what a woman can do logically, just the same for men and intersex people.OK, to make it clear: Chicks (generally) suck at logic and science.
@ShermanOK, to make it clear: Chicks (generally) suck at logic and science.
This is just wrong. Women are less able to excell at math, but they are in general more than competent at logic and science.OK, to make it clear: Chicks (generally) suck at logic and science.
You debate like a liberal. Just say the opposite with no substance.Indeed, so general that it meant nothing.
False claim.
Should mean close to nil but that is the point, which you miss more often than not.What difference does it make in this situation?
Women have female qualities that men do not have and men have abilities that excel those in women, such as swimming, for example, that modern male transvestites have proven by invading women's sports.This is just wrong. Women are less able to excell at math, but they are in general more than competent at logic and science.
It is males doing a weak job attacking evolution. I used to wipe the floors with evolutionists trying to make their case here. Y'all barely holding your own lately
I'm so hurt.You debate like a liberal.
Wrong.Just say the opposite with no substance.
Care to discuss the topic?Should mean close to nil but that is the point, which you miss more often than not.