• This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.

How does one determine, using the scientific method, that the earth is billions of years old?

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Can anyone provide information on the scientific method used to determine that the earth is billions of years old? Thanks.
Yes. Most definitely. The following people can:

Neil deGrasse Tyson
Richard Dawkins
Daniel Dennett
Greg Graffin
Steven Pinker
Matt Ridley
Carl Sagan
Peter Atkins
Robert Ardrey
Bill Nye, the Science Guy
Walter White aka Heisenberg
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
"Anyone" means (as you should have understood, but you're dumb) anyone on this site.

I.e., Anyone posting here.
Okay. Then:

User Name
Arthur Brain
Rusha
Anna
quip
JonahDog
Town Heretic
The Barbarian
Skeeter
Some other dude < Can but won't!!
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Can anyone provide information on the scientific method used to determine that the earth is billions of years old? Thanks.

“Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle and we’ll explain the rest.’ And the one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.” - Terence McKenna
 
Last edited:

marke

Well-known member
“Modern science is based on the principle: ‘Give us one free miracle and we’ll explain the rest.’ And the one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing.” - Terence McKenna
Exactly. Evolutionists insist the miracle of the big bang explains the sudden appearance of the universe from nothing and nowhere, thus refuting the Biblical account.

[Attributing the origin of life to spontaneous generation.] However improbable we regard this event, it will almost certainly happen at least once…. The time… is of the order of two billion years.… Given so much time, the “impossible” becomes possible, the possible probable, and the probable virtually certain. One only has to wait: time itself performs the miracles.
George Wald
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
[Attributing the origin of life to spontaneous generation.] However improbable we regard this event, it will almost certainly happen at least once…. The time… is of the order of two billion years.… Given so much time, the “impossible” becomes possible, the possible probable, and the probable virtually certain. One only has to wait: time itself performs the miracles.
George Wald
Nice quote! Evolutionary Biologists do not have to say anything about the big bang. They leave that to astrophysicists.
 

marke

Well-known member
Nice quote! Evolutionary Biologists do not have to say anything about the big bang. They leave that to astrophysicists.
The whole evolution framework is built on the foundation of an origins myth that everyone knows is not a scientifically proven fact and nobody wants to discuss for the problems it builds into speculation defined as evolution theory.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
1. Start with observations that can be reproduced in the lab today.

2. Apply unprovable assumptions

3. Employ WAG technique

4. Ignore inconvenient elements that disprove your assertion

5. PROFIT!
No. 3 is my favorite technique.
 
Top