Both.
You're on probation.
He may be?
Both.
You're on probation.
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Care to back up those allegations with facts?
i.e. perhaps you could show us Senator Clinton's voting record to confirm such allegations and provide information showing that her votes do indeed promote a Marxist agenda.
ACW is equivalent to the poster: Letsargue, without all the odd repetitive punctuation, of course. ACW is plagued with severe anger issues.
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4793370&viewfull=1#post4793370You didn't answer my questions properly. In fact, you didn't answer them at all. You don't make the rules around here. Let me be honest with you, "I think you're the "Scum" of TOL. You're obviously not a Christian believer and I have no respect for you as a human being. I love telling you these truths. It gives me, one fine feeling. Personally, I believe you do more harm in this world than ALL of the homosexuals combined. I think you're morally debased and an enemy of Christianity. Your filth is permitted here, however, everybody doesn't have to accept your obscene rantings. I enjoy being able to tell you who and what you are. You're a "Moral Maggot" and a sewer rat. If I had my way, I'd have you banned for life. You serve no worthy purpose on this forum. Hopefully. some day you'll hear the Gospel and place your faith in Christ. Otherwise, your eternal existence doesn't look too promising.
That felt wonderful. Thanks for the opportunity to tell a depraved person such as yourself, what a wonderful guy you are.
ACW is a psychopath with obsessive issues. He obsesses over homosexuality to such a degree that one is led to believe he is a homosexual himself. He now obsesses over Trump, God only knows why.I really think you're some kind of a "Nutcase." No offense intended, however, you should consider seeking psychiatric intervention?
Remember the flop called Hillarycare she wanted to push as FLOTUS?
I don't trust Trump any more than you do but you sure sound more and more like a not-so-closeted Clinton supporter.
Gun control is one of the few issues on which Clinton has a more left-leaning record than Sanders, who represents a rural, pro-gun-rights state and has voted in the past for legislation to protect the firearms industry. Although Clinton has not attacked Sanders by name, by invoking guns she makes an unspoken contrast.
The issue also fits neatly into the overall narrative Clinton is trying to present. She can stake out a bold stance on an issue that plays well with the liberal base while arguing that she would break through the partisan stalemate in Washington . . .
Howard Wolfson, for many years a top Clinton aide before going to work for Bloomberg, said Clinton’s avoidance of guns in 2008 should not be mistaken for a lack of interest in gun control.
“I started working for her back in 1999 and she talked about it back then,” Wolfson said. “As a senator from New York, it was something that was important to her. I think in the wake of Newtown and Charleston, it’s more resonant in our political culture.”
ACW is a psychopath with obsessive issues. He obsesses over homosexuality to such a degree that one is led to believe he is a homosexual himself. He now obsesses over Trump, God only knows why.
How about we talk about Donald Trump's plan for universal healthcare?
I was reading a post of yours from early in the primaries where you warmed me about Donald Trump (I was somewhat impressed with his stance on certain issues at the time, but then I wised up).
What has changed?
You asked me about Clinton, moron.
Nothing on my end. You've come out more for Clinton is the only change I can see
I know nothing about Trump's positions.
ACW is a psychopath with obsessive issues. He obsesses over homosexuality to such a degree that one is led to believe he is a homosexual himself. He now obsesses over Trump, God only knows why.
Uh huh:
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4793370&viewfull=1#post4793370
Now that we've addressed my anger issues, can we return to the topic of the thread?
Remember the flop called Hillarycare she wanted to push as FLOTUS?
I don't trust Trump any more than you do but you sure sound more and more like a not-so-closeted Clinton supporter.
Let's say you're right on all points.
How would that mitigate in Clinton's favor?
You clearly believe it would. Explain why.
First of all:
The Quote function: learn it.
If I'm reading your question correctly, my answer is this:
In war, it's so very important to know your enemy. With a President Hillary Clinton, conservatives will know what they're up against, and hence prepare to override legislation that will be harmful to the conservative cause.
Then you've already lost.
But now I see why you're pulling for Clinton.
I've explained myself, now explain why you're pro Trump.