Sonnet
New member
An apology would have been nice.
What? You mean the fact that I affirm God's omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresent - his sovereignty?
ECT Grace is unconditional but not universal
- Thread starter Nang
- Start date
- Status
An apology would have been nice.
What? You mean the fact that I affirm God's omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresent - his sovereignty?
Cross Reference
New member
All folks receive the general evidence of God because it is undeniable.. He calls those He chooses from that crowd; those that believe the evidence and it is not for salvation but discipleship that God makes such a call.
The bear, the free will beast
Semi pelagianism way
The question mark equals don't know God
I didn't see the video. I proclaimed it and I meant that as well as the rest of the Bible truthers proclaimed it. To you, it's in invisible ink. You don't hear them
Are kilts allowed?
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
But this is why you're not getting through to him/them. You're referrring to "sins" as the resulting actions from acting.
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
What if the perception is all wrong? What if Jesus didn't die for people, but for the sin OF the people?
What if Jesus died for the snake-bitten condition rather than the peoople themselves?
He was the scapegoat, who was made sin (not singular articular, but singular anarthrous). The scapegoat didn't have people placed upon it.
He didn't die for the whole world. He died for the SINS of the whole world. And sin is not a "something". It's a lack of something as a "somethinglessness".
He died for the hole or void in mankind. To fill it by being made sin, the singular anarthrous noun. The source of all acting and actions as the verb.
What if everyone is squabbling over the wrong thing? Focusing on the whos rather than the what.
You're an epic fail for trying so hard to make the Calvinists arminians or in your own faslse theology.
I proclaim Romans 5:8,*“but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.”
------
HOW CAN I BE PUT RIGHT?
Answer: Faith. Jesus died for our sins and rose again from the grave. By faith in him, our sins can be forgiven and we can be assured of living forever with God and one day being raised from the dead like Christ. So what does it mean to believe, to have faith? First, it means to grasp what salvation “by faith” means. Believing in Christ does not mean that we are forgiven for our past, get a new start on life, and must simply try harder to live better than we did in the past. If this is your mind-set, you are still putting your faith in yourself. You are your own Savior. You are looking to your moral efforts and abilities to make yourself right with God. But this will never work. No one lives a perfect life. Even your best deeds are tainted by selfish and impure motives. -Dr. Timothy Keller
Me doing it your way is wrong in every way. Piper's version is different from Owens version and yet you want me to bow to you? I gave you a refute award but it's a cheap award just to get you to shut up with you false lies. It didn't really work on unregenerates and you want me to be sorry for that. I should have known better cause the Bible said you won't hear the gospel. You're a total waste of my time but I'm instructed to preach the gospel to you and yet you want to give God a hard time. You ought to take it easy on your lies cause the flames are really hot and lasts forever. You're not going to like it.
Can you briefly rephrase Piper's version so we can understand what you mean by actions?
Sonnet
New member
Where did you proclaim it?
Calvinists on this forum have explicitly refused to proclaim it.
Jesus did for us is all over the place. Your boring me with your lies.
Sonnet
New member
Not for the Piper/Owen - but for your ad hominem attack.
I have no idea what you re saying.
Give God a hard time? Where?
This is a lie? 1 John 2:2?
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
:thumb:
Romans 14:23
And he that doubteth is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith: for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.
Sonnet
New member
PneumaPsucheSoma
TOL Subscriber
I wouldn't present it like that at all. It focuses on "sin/s" the verb rather than "sin/s" the noun.
It's not about sinning (the verb) and the resulting acts. It's about the condition of what's missing from man being the source of all action.
Arminians are always arguing about the "doing" and "done" of sin/s the verb (and the resulting noun). Calvinists never counter with a correction of that perception, and instead focus on the same thing.
- Status