Google censors TheologyOnLine!

[temple2006]

Well, duh! When did that ever stop you, Zak?

 

[Dulcita]

Ohhhhhh

Freak is a real published author? Where can I get an autographed copy?

 

[Freak]

Originally posted by Dulcita
Ohhhhhh

Freak is a real published author? Where can I get an autographed copy?

Yes. I am. Check out amazon.com for yourself and get the book.

 

[Zakath]

Originally posted by Dulcita
Freak is a real published author?

In a manner of speaking.

Jay appears to be self-published. (Amazon lists his publisher as "unknown".) There are publishing houses that will print anything you want if you've got a few hundred dollars, up front of course...

 

[Freak]

Originally posted by Zakath


In a manner of speaking.

Jay appears to be self-published. (Amazon lists his publisher as "unknown".) There are publishing houses that will print anything you want if you've got a few hundred dollars, up front of course...

You better check again. I do have a publisher based out of Fairfax, Va. I have had all kinds of problems with amazon.com here recently, so don't be surprised they get some of the info wrong.

 

[Zakath]

Does the publisher have a name?

Would you kindly supply the name?

 

[Zakath]

(sound of crickets chirping...)

 

[CoCrucified]

Google likes four-letter, vile, obscence, pornographic words! Good is bad, and bad is good!

Whoops, I'm judging!!!

Alan

 

[Zakath]

Google likes what makes money and reduces their risk of being sued.

They're just a business.

There are already businesses that handle "morality" issues. They're called "churches".

I'd bet that Google has no desire to compete in that arena.

 

[CoCrucified]

Originally posted by Zakath
Google likes what makes money and reduces their risk of being sued.

Of course anyone can sue for anything; however, I don't think just listing what's out there makes them liable for what is said.

 

[Zakath]

Originally posted by CoCrucified
Of course anyone can sue for anything; however, I don't think just listing what's out there makes them liable for what is said.

I agree, it's only that in our litigious society, even the non-involved parties sometimes have to spend money on legal defense.

It's aggravating, but the real world is sometimes that way.

 

[CoCrucified]

Originally posted by Zakath
I agree, it's only that in our litigious society, even the non-involved parties sometimes have to spend money on legal defense.

It's aggravating, but the real world is sometimes that way.

I think we need "looser pays." That would stop a lot of this nonsense. If someone brings an unfounded lawsuit, they should pay both sides legal expenses.

 

[Zakath]

Originally posted by CoCrucified
I think we need "looser pays." That would stop a lot of this nonsense. If someone brings an unfounded lawsuit, they should pay both sides legal expenses.

Interesting idea. It would be particularly expensive if the state lost a suit - then the taxpayers get to pay.

 

[CoCrucified]

Originally posted by Zakath
Interesting idea. It would be particularly expensive if the state lost a suit - then the taxpayers get to pay.

True. Maybe the politicians who mess up should pay instead!

 

[Zakath]

Hey, this is sounding better all the time.