No. Look at your post. The first quote box shuold have "Originally posted by Lighthouse," at the beginning. But instead, the code that causes that to apper is outside the quote box. I don't know how you're managing to do it, but it's distracting. And quite unpleasing aestetichally.Agape4Robin said:Is this better?
Yes, I believe it is the only correct one. Because to know something that does not exist is impossible. Even for God. Because for Him to know it it would have to first exist. Just like He can't exist in wonderland, or create a rock so heavy He can't lift it. It's illogical, and imposible.So you assume that the Open Theist view is the only correct one. I tire of this circular arguement. It proves nothing, and you are just as set in your beliefs as I am.
Of course not. However, if it were true, then free will would be an illusion.And my Orthodox view of christianity as God being all knowing....past, present and future does not impose on my free will either.
You're the one who thinks God was lying.:doh:
Seeing as how beanieboy has never known God...Funny that you would say that. Beanieboy said the same thing about God leading him to buddhism.
Perhaps you two are talking to the same god. :think:
I do know him. And he's weak. He's powerless.I didn't say fear. I said "know your enemy".
But hey, it's your choice.
I am dead to sin. And sin is not the result of Satan's power over anyone.So, you don't sin?
I will say this, I am not a sinner. I am free from, dead to, sin. By the blood of Christ. I am a new creation, and I am in Christ. In Christ there is no sin. Any sin I have is in the old me. That is not who I am, anymore.
"Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin the dwelleth in me."
-Romans 7:20
If you had proven it, then why would I still argue against it? You can't prove something that isn't true.Yes I did.
So you don't think it was a risk? You do realize that true love takes risks, don't you?Hhhmmmmm.......God the cosmic gambler....... :think:
Maybe Heaven will have a place like Las Vegas, only with out the prostitution and mafia! :darwinsm:
And for some reason you haven't even touched on the idea that God, knowing who would and would not go to hell, still died for all people. Why would He do that? What would be the point of dying for all people when He knew exactly who would and who would not come to Him?
But He still died for all men? Why?:duh:
You don't think animals do what they want?:cow: :Shaggy: :aimiel: :troy: :crow2: :chicken: :dog:
It was not postponed. The later destruction was for a completely different reason. And still, even if it had just been a postponement [God has doen that] the truth of the matter stands. God did not do what He said He would do. He changed His mind, because they repented.It has everything to do with it. Even if it was postponed, it still happened. :grave:
What do you think? His decision was a change from when He had not decided. When he thought to create, He had not thought to create before. That is a change.A change from what?
What?OY! :doh:
Apparently not.I know enough about hermaneutics to know when to be literal or otherwise.
How? Can you show me how I am ignoring anything? How am I skirting logic?Same for you.........
He doesn't change it, because it isn't there. It's gone. And since it isn't there, neither is He.I never said or implied that God reaches in to the past and changes anything. The past does exist in the past. They call it history......
If it isn't then to say it's true is an argument from silence.Does it have to be documented? :readthis:
Why doesn't it make sense?I don't think you make sense. :nono:
The only way His knowledge would not keep us from having free will is if He either chose not to know, or He couldn't know.If anything God (in His wisdom) chooses not to impose His knowledge (of future events) in attempt to force us to abandon our free will. That is a truly loving and omniscient God.