philosophizer
New member
Don't let Turbo fool you. He's really the Joker. There are pictures that prove it.
:chuckle: ...one of the best incentives to subscribe to TOL.Originally posted by philosophizer
Don't let Turbo fool you. He's really the Joker. There are pictures that prove it.
No thanks. Jesus credited Moses as the author of Genesis.Originally posted by billwald
One theory is that Genesis was written during the Babalonian captivity. See Donald Akenson and others.
Originally posted by Turbo
No thanks. Jesus credited Moses as the author of Genesis.
- [jesus]"But concerning the dead, that they rise, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the burning bush passage, how God spoke to him, saying, 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'?" [/jesus]Mark 12:26 (also Luke 20:37)
[jesus]"Moses therefore gave you circumcision (not that it is from Moses, but from the fathers), and you circumcise a man on the Sabbath." [/jesus] John 7:22
If Jesus is who he claimed, he would know for certain.Originally posted by Zakath
The Jews traditionally refer to the Pentateuch as the "books of Moses", even though many of them do not believe he actually wrote them, it's merely their tradition.
No. Circumcision was given to Abraham, but Moses recorded the story in Genesis.But doesn't that parenthetical comment indicate that Jesus did not consider Moses the author of the texts relevant to circumcision, but "the fathers" (aka "the patriarchs")?
That's a pretty big "if" from where I sit.Originally posted by Turbo
If Jesus is who he claimed, he would know for certain.
And Abraham gave it to his descendents, not Moses. Circumcision was commonly practiced by the Jews before Moses would have written anything. He did not give the Jews circumcision. If Jesus was who you think he claimed to be, he would have known that for certain.No. Circumcision was given to Abraham, but Moses recorded the story in Genesis.
Originally posted by Frank Ernest
As a literal reading, I would find it difficult to figure that eating a piece of fruit would make one wise, or become as gods, or know good from evil.
That's your problem, both because of which forum this thread is in and in the larger scheme of things.Originally posted by Zakath
That's a pretty big "if" from where I sit.
I know. That's why I said, "Circumcision was given to Abraham, but Moses recorded the story in Genesis."And Abraham gave it to his descendents, not Moses. Circumcision was commonly practiced by the Jews before Moses would have written anything. He did not give the Jews circumcision.
He did. That's why he said, "Moses therefore gave you circumcision , and you circumcise a man on the Sabbath."If Jesus was who you think he claimed to be, he would have known that for certain.
Remember what Jesus said about Satan, that he saw him falling from heaven like lightning?Originally posted by Frank Ernest
Cool-Icy:
"The imagery of a snake has symbolic meaning..."
FrankiE:
That it does. Mind telling me what the symbol stands for?
Cool-Icy:
The forbidden Fruit is symbolism of the first sin. That Fruit of Tree and Knowledge, the definition of sin is rebellion against God.
FrankiE:
And that sin was?
Cool-Icy:
"Hence the Fruit, is all about wanting to be God, which is why we try to rebel against God."
FrankiE:
And the fruit is symbolic of ...?
Originally posted by philosophizer
It looks really funny in this post, with you new avatar, when you say "Batman is right." :chuckle:
Or are you? :think:Originally posted by Batman
I'm the real Batman!
These two groups, Abraham's household and the Hebrews, are one in the same.Originally posted by OMEGA
De - Batemen are having a Debate
------------------------------------------------
Abraham just told his household and boy were they sore.
God told Moses to tell the Hebrews who were chosen
by the Lord God to be His People and they were sore at both
God and Moses.
:thumb:
Maybe because Cain's was the first conception ever. Or maybe it was to make it easy to debunk false teachers who would someday claim that Cain was Satan's son and not Adam's.Originally posted by Frank Ernest
Why, in Genesis, is Cain's conception specifically mentioned while Abel's is not?
You answered your own question. Even if that word were translated as "seduced," it wouldn't mean that he sexually seduced her, because of the context in which the word is used. :duh: He seduced her into rebelling against God's command not to eat from that tree.Originally posted by Frank Ernest
FrankiE:
Genesis 3:13-14. Please explain the word "beguiled" in verse 13.
Beguiled (English) from nâshâ' (Hebrew)
naw-shaw'
A primitive root; to lead astray, that is, (mentally) to delude, or (morally) to seduce: - beguile, deceive, X greatly, X utterly.
God forbade the Israelites from eating unclean animals.Do you have other examples from the Bible where God punished people for eating the wrong fruit
God forbade the Isrealites from working on the Sabbath.or picking up the wrong stone?