Baloney... only in the minds of those that believe fairy tales.
I accept BOTH science and the Bible. No contest.
Ah, drive a car much? Bet those petroleum geologists believe in the same fairy tale.
The Bible and science are not compatible
Baloney... only in the minds of those that believe fairy tales.
I accept BOTH science and the Bible. No contest.
Fallacious logic.Ah, drive a car much? Bet those petroleum geologists believe in the same fairy tale.
False claim.The Bible and science are not compatible
Fallacious logic.
Cars work no matter who believes what the age of the earth is.
False claim.
Is you'd like to actually discuss facts instead of pushing your philosophy, that would be great.
:rotfl:1. Missed the point.
Restarting your philosophy over and over is not discussing the facts.2. The earth is billions of years old, there was no Noah's Flood, man and dinosaurs did not live at the same time,. Facts.
:rotfl:
Restarting your philosophy over and over is not discussing the facts.
Simply saying "facts" only proves that you do not know what you're talking about.
What your wife says is cute and completely irrelevant.Well, as my wife would say, "I'd agree with you but then we would both be wrong."
No, they are not and it does not matter how many time you repeat yourself.The facts I stated are facts.
Once again, just a personal attack on me and no discussion of any facts.If you believe otherwise you are either uneducated or you let your theology decide science issues for you. A shame either way.
What your wife says is cute and completely irrelevant.
No, they are not and it does not matter how many time you repeat yourself.
Once again, just a personal attack on me and no discussion of any facts.
You are the one believing in a fairy tale.
P.S. I'm a lead computer engineer. I'm well enough educated to discuss science facts, but you will not even attempt to do so.
P.P.S. With regards to your "science knowledge" you are a poser.
I wasn't trying to compete, just telling you that I'm not the dunce that you like to believe that I am.Nope sorry, BS and MS in biology.
Yes, fairy tale. It's based on a belief that is false.Fairy tale? Nope again.
No, it's not.Believing in a 6000+/- year old earth and a world wide flood about 4000 years ago is the fairy tale.
Again, quit with the distraction and just tell me.Again, I'd suggest you seek out a geologist at a local university.
Have you done that? Why can't you just tell me?Right Divider, I gave you the best advice I can. Find a geologist at a local university who can explain to you how scientists understand why there are marine fossils on top of mountains.
Both are assumptions based on false premises.The short answer is lots of time and plate tectonics.
Insults are not going to help your case. When you want to discuss actual facts, I'm here.You have been on TOLsince 2013, hard to believe you have never heard that before. Hard to believe that as a lead computer engineer you would be so limited in your knowledge of the other sciences.
It is long age evolutionists that are "playing a game".show some intellectual curiosity and moral courage. Seek out a geologist at a local college, ask them to explain it to you.
Other than that, not playing this game with you.
Have you done that? Why can't you just tell me?
Both are assumptions based on false premises.
Insults are not going to help your case. When you want to discuss actual facts, I'm here.
It is long age evolutionists that are "playing a game".
I'm done. continue in your ignorance. Nothing else I can do. But have a nice life.
This is EXACTLY how the story goes when conversing with an evolutionist ... no discussion of FACTS.... just crying when the evolutionist's philosophy is rejected.
Long ages are based on a failed model for the creation of the universe. You can BELIEVE it if you want, but ranting that it's a fact is false.
Anyway... what JR posted is correct. Fossils to NOT take long periods of time to form. They take the right conditions.... like those that occurred during the global flood.
Thanks again for the morning comedy show.
Thanks again for your lack of engagement in facts and details.
I understand the real world regardless of your insults to the contrary.And thanks for your lack of real desire to understand the real world.
Again with your insults. No engagement over facts of details, just condescending nonsense.One would think that a lead engineer would have some intellectual curiosity and be unafraid to find the truth.
Again with your insults. No engagement over facts of details, just condescending nonsense.I understand the real world regardless of your insults to the contrary.
More condescending drivel.Nope, discussing the global flood is like discussing unicorns.
More condescending drivel.
Discuss the topic
There are unicorns in the fossil record. The flood happened, the results are obvious to anyone that is not blinded by their own chosen paradigm.Unicorns are fake, The Flood never happened.
Again, more drivel and condescending insults.What more do we need to discuss? Those who understand and accept science agree to both of those as facts. Discussing The Flood with Biblical literalists is a ginormous waste of time and energy. If you must believe the Bible in order to avoid your vengeful deity, then you are simply stuck. I feel sorry for you.