Of course its totally stubborn to want to know more information about something before setting my mind on a conclusion in either direction
There would be loads of reasons for other people to lie ALSO when it comes to terrorism.
Former Palestinian Terrorist Walid Shoebat on BEL
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Of course its totally stubborn to want to know more information about something before setting my mind on a conclusion in either direction
There would be loads of reasons for other people to lie ALSO when it comes to terrorism.
Of course its totally stubborn to want to know more information about something before setting my mind on a conclusion in either direction
There would be loads of reasons for other people to lie ALSO when it comes to terrorism.
Then quit stalling and get reading. This won't take long.
It's not my logic, it's Walid Shoebat's logic.
What part of' i had never heard of this guy till reading this thread' did you miss?
Bob Enyart is a dispensationalist/futurist.
Walid Shoebat makes his living duping dispensationalists/futurists.
Bob Enyart isn't the first dispie that Shoebat's duped, and Enyart won't be the last.
Ok, ive read a bit and the bank thing is problematic, as well as the charity thing, as far as the verifying him a terrorist and his jail stay under another name and family accounts, i could understand why they would not be verifiable for reasons to protect themselves especially if they are as he says still involved with terrorist groups themselves, so i wouldnt put any stock in their inability to verify those things, however a charity name and registration in the states should be able to be verified and i don't know why a bank would claim to have never been attacked if it had.
So i would have to say its 50/50 on this guy, because of the nature of what he claimed he used to be, there could be reasons still that some things are not known.
He also could certainly be a con man too.
So i would have to say its 50/50 on this guy, because of the nature of what he claimed he used to be, there could be reasons still that some things are not known.
He also could certainly be a con man too.
Have you ever seen the movie called "leap of faith"?
Lets say the guy does have less than ideal motives for what hes doing and has made some things up and his motive is money (being where he grew up, he can certainly fill in the blanks truthfully about terrorism in general and the evils of Islam) yet gives a testimony of Christ and people hear it and give Glory to God, and are led to Christ...
Well i believe God can even use a con man in the overall picture so i am not real worried about the man honestly.
Im not defending him, thats what you want to see me doing though - you confuse my not condemning him, as defense when ive clearly said i dont know either way.
I wouldnt give him any money but someone else might and thats their own decision to make.
What do i need to be ashamed of? Im confident that if hes a liar God will handle him.
You're not condemning this charlatan because you're stubborn and interested in being contrary. Knock yourself out. A sucker's born every minute and there's always someone outside the tent making excuses for the snake oil salesman.
No sucker here and God isnt one either, and no one makes anyone buy something from the snake oil salesman, and no one makes someone reject the truth for the lie that the ultimate snake leads them to.
Now, if you can show me this guy teaching that if i give him some money, i will be more blessed or God will give me more etc.. then ill condemn the man on the spot or any other totally unbiblical teaching.
So you won't condemn him for lying, or stealing, or using your faith as a con--none of that. No, that doesn't count, for some reason.
When you can't bring yourself to denounce a con man because of stubbornness, that just puts the lie to your faith. Anything goes, anything's acceptable, and the ends justify the means. (Part of this also probably boils down to you hating the idea of agreeing with me, which frankly is immature and stupid.)
He's a cheap lying hustler, and you just don't have any problem with him being a wolf so long as he doesn't outright bite any sheep. (Just fleeces 'em.)
That's pretty rotten fruit.
If i knew for a FACT that is what he was doing, certainly, i do not know it for a Fact and because of the nature of what hes claiming, its doubtful anyone could verify it all.
I dont falsely accuse people granite.
He might be, and he might not, and he has to answer either way.
But you go ahead and condemn me and falsely accuse me all you want if it makes your day
Then watch the CNN expose. He's busted.
Seems to me you've got more than enough time.
It helps when you know what you're talking about. Which is ultimately what this thread is about: It's easy to find a mark. But it's just as easy to do your homework and bust a con man. People hate admitting when they've been duped--stepping on a rake isn't any fun. But there's zero sense denying what's old news.
Because you have time to monitor my time?
Shut up, you lily livered panty-waist.
Thems be fightin' words. Well, for a 9 year old. typical.