For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
You simply can't point to a few examples of small-scale voter fraud and claim that it nullifies the results of an entire national election. Well, you can, but you'll have to do better than that if you expect reasonable people to take your claims seriously.
There is no reason on the left just the narrative and agenda to destroy America.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
According to a recent CNN poll, 30 percent of Americans—including 70 percent of Republicans—do not believe that Joe Biden legitimately won the 2020 election. Almost 7-in-10 of those who do not believe he won agreed that there is “solid evidence” to the contrary. Some of these people point to “sworn affidavits” about election irregularities.

But who swore, what did they swear to, and what happened when law enforcement officials, prosecutors, and judges looked at the charges? Dozens of state and federal judges, including at least nine Trump-appointed judges, found little or no merit to them. Also keep in mind that over half of all currently serving federal judges were appointed by Republican presidents.

The conservative Hoover Institution in February released a statistical analysis of some of the claims, finding them wanting and underwhelming.

 

Derf

Well-known member
According to a recent CNN poll, 30 percent of Americans—including 70 percent of Republicans—do not believe that Joe Biden legitimately won the 2020 election. Almost 7-in-10 of those who do not believe he won agreed that there is “solid evidence” to the contrary. Some of these people point to “sworn affidavits” about election irregularities.

But who swore, what did they swear to, and what happened when law enforcement officials, prosecutors, and judges looked at the charges? Dozens of state and federal judges, including at least nine Trump-appointed judges, found little or no merit to them. Also keep in mind that over half of all currently serving federal judges were appointed by Republican presidents.

The conservative Hoover Institution in February released a statistical analysis of some of the claims, finding them wanting and underwhelming.

So there’s a large divide between beliefs here? Isn’t that the reason for a reasonable accounting via an audit that checks out these things that have raised suspicions in some? If not the courts calling for them, which might be correct, then the state legislatures? They are essentially calling their own laws into question. This is reasonable behavior—to determine if something was not done right and do it better. It’s a form of repentance.
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
According to a recent CNN poll, 30 percent of Americans—including 70 percent of Republicans—do not believe that Joe Biden legitimately won the 2020 election. Almost 7-in-10 of those who do not believe he won agreed that there is “solid evidence” to the contrary. Some of these people point to “sworn affidavits” about election irregularities.

But who swore, what did they swear to, and what happened when law enforcement officials, prosecutors, and judges looked at the charges? Dozens of state and federal judges, including at least nine Trump-appointed judges, found little or no merit to them. Also keep in mind that over half of all currently serving federal judges were appointed by Republican presidents.

The conservative Hoover Institution in February released a statistical analysis of some of the claims, finding them wanting and underwhelming.

That's just blatantly false. Judges have not looked at the depositions sworn under penalty of perjury. They have avoided looking at the evidence by claiming technical issues.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Judges have not looked at the depositions sworn under penalty of perjury. They have avoided looking at the evidence by claiming technical issues.
And it's all those corrupt Republican-appointed judges who are doing that. They've been bought/bribed/blackmailed by the Deep State! Throw the bums out, I say.
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
And it's all those corrupt Republican-appointed judges who are doing that. They've been bought/bribed/blackmailed by the Deep State! Throw the bums out, I say.
I can see you have confidence in Omar, AOC , Schumer ,Presley Waters, and that alcoholic wack job in charge of the Congress.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
I do understand that there are a lot of Trump appointees that are federal judges. Trump appointed 3 of them to the Supreme Court. Not one of them stood up for him. Not one. They're all hacks, but they're not hacking for Trump. And if they are not hacking for Trump, then they are not hacking for MAGA either. Oh well, it's over now for sure. We've all been had. Too bad.
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has scored a $2-million advance on a book deal
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
In other words, you have nothing that would overturn the results of an election in which Biden won by 7 million votes? Got it.
You mean the votes stole through dominion voting machines ? Biden hid out during the run up to the vote because they knew the stolen dominion votes would be a win for their shoe in pedo Biden.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Exactly. Any evidence for a claim has to be substantial otherwise what's the point?

Not according to God...

But we know what you think of what He has to say...

This is God's standard:

“One witness shall not rise against a man concerning any iniquity or any sin that he commits; by the mouth of two or three witnesses the matter shall be established. - Deuteronomy 19:15 http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Deuteronomy19:15&version=NKJV

The "two or three" part is significant, because it means that you need to weigh the evidence.

Sometimes only two pieces are sufficient, sometimes three are necessary.

You aren't weighing the evidence. Simply setting an arbitrary threshold for the kind of evidence you'll accept, and then dismissing all other evidence because it doesn't meet that standard.

It's called special pleading.
 

Derf

Well-known member
You keep throwing this sort of stuff about and it only reflects badly on you. The truth of the matter is is that there's no substantive evidence for widespread voter fraud, end of. Plenty of whack a doodle claims and assertions but nothing of substance. If an accusation or claim is levelled then it requires substantial evidence, what other sort of evidence is worth anything?
Tell me, @Arthur Brain or @User Name, what you would accept from the AZ audit as real or substantial evidence.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
You mean the votes stole through dominion voting machines ? Biden hid out during the run up to the vote because they knew the stolen dominion votes would be a win for their shoe in pedo Biden.
Dominion voting machines? You mean the voting machines that are owned by the company that is suing Sidney Powell, who now says as her defense in court that "no reasonable person" would believe her claims of election fraud? You mean that Dominion?

Kraken lawyer Sidney Powell admitted in a filing in federal court that “no reasonable person would conclude that [her] statements were truly statements of fact.” Powell made the filing in response to a defamation suit from Dominion Voting Systems in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

The Kraken Cracks Under Pressure Sidney Powell Claims No Reasonable Person Would Conclude That Her Statements Were Truly Statements Of Fact | Elections
 
Top