A judge is supposed to be a neutral arbiter of the law. Judges are largely supposed to police themselves. Failure to recuse oneself in a matter where personal interests or the interests of a spouse is at issue will be an ethics violation warranting discipline.
You are right to wish judges were neutral but you are wrong if you think they are. Democrats do not appoint judges who are neutral on abortion, for example, but they appoint judges whose biased minds are completely hardened against giving babies in the womb any mercy from adults who want them dead. Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee, oversaw the General Flynn case until after the democrat attack prosecutors obtained a guilty plea and then Judge Contreras recused himself and the case was given to a Clinton appointee who proved he was willingn to ignore the law, refuse to abide by court orders, and refuse to allow the case to be resolved until he could no longer hold ouit against the pressure against him for his foolish hatred and persecution of Flynn, an innocent victim of the democrat gestapo.
Why did Judge Contreras recuse himself after the Flynn case and not before? Strangely, he refused to say, which was in itself a violation of common practice. As it turns out, however, the mysterious leftist judge appointed by Obama may have also been the crooked judge who approved the illegal FISA applications submitted by Obama officials in the Justice Department. The more we learn about Justice officials under Obama the more we see how corrupt they all seemed to be collectively and in lock-step with their fascist, worse than Watergate, Spygate-in-chief, BO Obama.
Judge Rudolph Contreras recused himself from the case surrounding Michael Flynn, and people are wondering why. There’s one very distinct possibility. POLITICO – President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, will face a different judge to be sentenced than the one who...
theconservativetreehouse.com
Judge Rudolph Contreras recused himself from the case surrounding Michael Flynn, and people are wondering why. There’s one very distinct possibility.
Judge Rudolph Contreras is one of a very small group of FISA Court Judges. –LINK–
My instincts tell me that Judge Contreras was most likely the judge who signed off on the FISA warrant that led to the surveillance of Donald Trump’s campaign officials, that included National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn.
Those FBI FISA warrants are now coming under scrutiny.
It would be EXPLOSIVE if it turned out that the FISA warrants were gained by deception, misleading information, manipulated information, or fraud…. and that warrant led to the wiretapping and surveillance of General Michael Flynn was authorized by Contreras…. who would now be the judge in Flynn’s case.
Yes, the conflict of interest would be beyond stunning.
Oh, like I keep sayin’….
Stay tuned!
www.theblaze.com
