7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Um, that's what @JudgeRightly is doing by asking you to name names. Why are you too embarrassed to name names? Why are you trying to suppress his research?
Election Cheating 2022
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
Please, what?
I'm the one asking you to verify your claims. So yes, please answer the question.
Who says TGP is wingnut? Just you? Or someone else?
Name names.
Apparently you don't think my having done research that says that "TGP is not wingnut" is valid, because you clearly think I'm wrong, hence why I'm asking you to defend your claim that "TGP is wingnut."
And you also apparently don't consider me asking you "Who says TGP is wingnut?" to be research into the matter of TGP being wingnut. Why?
Says who? You?
Why should I trust someone who is so clearly biased against them?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
I mean, since you're a far-left wingnut, we wouldn't really expect you to refrain from saying things like that. You do what you are.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
The Gateway Pundit - Wikipedia
The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes.[10][30][58] It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news",[20] by Newsweek as a fake news website,[59] and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories".[60] In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "the most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and The Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation."[19] As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up."[61] Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right".[61]
In November 2019, the Wikipedia community deprecated The Gateway Pundit as an untrustworthy source of information.[62][63]
In July 2021, a spokesperson for Google said that the company had demonetized The Gateway Pundit's homepage and some of its articles, stating: "We have strict publisher policies that prohibit content promoting anti-vaccine theories, COVID-19 misinformation, and false claims about the 2020 U.S. Presidential election – and our enforcement can be as targeted as demonetizing a specific page. We already actioned the majority of pages shared from this report back in 2020 or early 2021 and similarly stopped serving ads on the site’s homepage last year. We will continue to take appropriate action if new content is uploaded that violates our policies."[49] In September 2021, Google demonetized the site.[38][39][40] A Google spokesman stated: "We gave the Gateway Pundit ample notice to address persistent policy violations before we took action. We will not serve Google ads on the site until they can comply with our guidelines."[38]
Seriously, one only has to click on one of Jefferson's links to see how bat crazy this site is, it's nuts. What next, you gonna tell me that infowars is a credible source for news?!
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I'm centre left but I do realize that for some of the addle brained on the far right, anything other equates to being far left. kinda funny and sad again...I mean, since you're a far-left wingnut, we wouldn't really expect you to refrain from saying things like that. You do what you are.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
You're a far-left wingnut.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Nah.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
—says the far-left wingnut.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, did say that the addle brained on the far right confuse anything outside of that particular sphere of being far left and here you are confirming that so ho hum...
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
—says the addle brained far-left wingnut.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Such a pillock...
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
—says the addle-brained, far-left wingnut/pillock.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Anyway, in other news related to the actual topic, there was no widespread voter fraud and Trump lost, sniveling and griping notwithstanding and heck, that's just from Trump...
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
The Gateway Pundit - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes.[10][30][58] It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news",[20] by Newsweek as a fake news website,[59] and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories".[60] In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "the most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and The Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation."[19] As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up."[61] Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right".[61]
In November 2019, the Wikipedia community deprecated The Gateway Pundit as an untrustworthy source of information.[62][63]
In July 2021, a spokesperson for Google said that the company had demonetized The Gateway Pundit's homepage and some of its articles, stating: "We have strict publisher policies that prohibit content promoting anti-vaccine theories, COVID-19 misinformation, and false claims about the 2020 U.S. Presidential election – and our enforcement can be as targeted as demonetizing a specific page. We already actioned the majority of pages shared from this report back in 2020 or early 2021 and similarly stopped serving ads on the site’s homepage last year. We will continue to take appropriate action if new content is uploaded that violates our policies."[49] In September 2021, Google demonetized the site.[38][39][40] A Google spokesman stated: "We gave the Gateway Pundit ample notice to address persistent policy violations before we took action. We will not serve Google ads on the site until they can comply with our guidelines."[38]
Seriously, one only has to click on one of Jefferson's links to see how bat crazy this site is, it's nuts. What next, you gonna tell me that infowars is a credible source for news?!
Wikipedia’s Left-Wing Bias
I love Wikipedia. I donated thousands of dollars to the Wikimedia Foundation.Before Wikipedia, all we had were printed encyclopedias—out of date by the time we bought them.
Then libertarian Jimmy Wales came up with a web-based, crowd-sourced encyclopedia.
Crowd-sourced? A Britannica editor called Wikipedia “a public restroom.” But Wales won the battle. Britannica’s encyclopedias are no longer printed.
Congratulations to Wales.
But recently, I learned that Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger now says Wikipedia’s political pages have turned into leftist “propaganda.”
That’s upsetting. Leftists took over the editing?
Sadly, yes. I checked it out.
All editing is done by volunteers. Wales hoped there would be enough diverse political persuasions that biases would be countered by others.
But that’s not what’s happening.
Leftists just like to write. Conservatives build things: companies, homes, farms.
You see the pattern comparing political donations from different professions: Surgeons, oil workers, truck drivers, loggers, and pilots lean right; artists, bartenders, librarians, reporters, and teachers lean left.
Conservatives don’t have as much time to tweet or argue on the web. Leftists do. And they love doing it. This helps them take over the media, universities, and now, Wikipedia.
Jonathan Weiss is what Wikipedia calls a “Top 100” Wikipedian because he’s made almost half a million edits. He says he’s noticed new bias: “Wikipedia does a great job on things like science and sports, but you see a lot of political bias come into play when you’re talking current events.”
Weiss is no conservative. In presidential races, he voted for Al Gore, Ralph Nader, and Barack Obama. Never for a Republican. “I’ve really never identified strongly with either political party,” he says.
Maybe that’s why he notices the new Wikipedia bias.
“People on the left far outweigh people on the center and the right … a lot [are] openly socialist and Marxist.” Some even post pictures of Che Guevara and Lenin on their own profiles.
These are the people who decide which news sources Wikipedia writers may cite. Wikipedia’s approved “Reliable sources” page rejects political reporting from Fox but calls CNN and MSNBC “reliable.”
Good conservative outlets like The Federalist, the Daily Caller, and The Daily Wire are all deemed “unreliable.” Same with the New York Post (That’s probably why Wikipedia called Hunter Biden’s emails a conspiracy theory even after other liberal media finally acknowledged that they were real).
While it excludes Fox, Wikipedia approves even hard left media like Vox, Slate, The Nation, Mother Jones, and Jacobin, a socialist publication.
Until recently, Wikipedia’s “socialism” and “communism” pages made no mention of the millions of people killed by socialism and communism. Even now, deaths are “deep in the article,” says Weiss, “treated as an arcane academic debate. But we’re talking about mass murder!”
The communism page even adds that we cannot ignore the “lives saved by communist modernization”! This is nuts.
Look up “concentration and internment camps” and you’ll find, along with the Holocaust, “Mexico-United States border,” and under that, “Trump administration family separation policy.”
What? Former President Donald Trump’s border controls, no matter how harsh, are very different from the Nazi’s mass murder.
Wikipedia does say “anyone can edit.” So, I made a small addition for political balance, mentioning that President Barack Obama built those cages.
My edit was taken down.
I wrote Wikipedia founder Wales to say that if his creation now uses only progressive sources, I would no longer donate.
He replied, “I totally respect the decision not to give us more money. I’m such a fan and have great respect for you and your work.” But then he said it is “just 100% false … that ‘only globalist, progressive mainstream sources’ are permitted.”
He gave examples of left-wing media that Wikipedia rejects, like Raw Story and Occupy Democrats.
I’m glad he rejects them. Those sites are childishly far left.
I then wrote again to ask why “there’s not a single right-leaning media outlet Wiki labels ‘reliable’ about politics, [but] Vox, Slate, The Nation, Mother Jones, CNN, MSNBC” get approval.
Wales then stopped responding to my emails.
Unless Wikipedia’s bias is fixed, I’ll be skeptical reading anything on the site.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
So why is it that there's still this bizarre, albeit funny as anything in some respects, inability for some to accept reality who still seem to think that Trump's in the white house? Would make a 'good' episode' of some 'world of the strange' series where curious phenomena is explored...
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Who says Trump's in the White House?
Right Divider
Body part
@Jefferson I also use to donate to WikiMedia. I also stopped due to the extreme left wing bias.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Wow, A Daily Signal article. And? The info regarding TGP on Wiki is extensive and having been someone who's read TGP - yeah, it is bat crazy!
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Nobody would with any sense but then again, nobody would claim he's still president with any sense either.