Quetzal
New member
Instead, I am going to leave this post right where it is. I like it better that way. No need to validate your silly argument any further.well, i'm not seeing it
if it's so obvious, you'll have no trouble explaining it
Instead, I am going to leave this post right where it is. I like it better that way. No need to validate your silly argument any further.well, i'm not seeing it
if it's so obvious, you'll have no trouble explaining it
IF someone is drugged or in a condition of black out, they cannot consent. It is always rape..
Instead, I am going to leave this post right where it is. I like it better that way. No need to validate your silly argument any further.
No one willingly contributes to criminal actions against themselves.
She did not actively invite someone to steal her car.a woman leaves her car door open and the car running while she runs into the store to make a quick purchase
the insurance company finds her willfully negligent and denies her claim
Doesn't make it a reality. If you would like to have a larger discussion about insurance claims and their policies, feel free to make another thread. :up:doesn't matter
the insurance company finds her actions willfully contributory
Doesn't make it a reality.
Well, let's see. One is a sport (boxing) and the other is rape. There is no commentary needed in regards to why rape is more harmful here.
if your behavior wasn't contributory to the criminal actions taken against you, then you bear no responsibility
i believe this point has been made before
She said she didn't want to have sex and he did it anyway.Try actually reading something before you make such statements....lest you look a bit biased on this issue. :chuckle:
"I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.’”
Herewith, a Philadelphia magazine report about Swarthmore College, where in 2013 a student “was in her room with a guy with whom she’d been hooking up for three months”:
“They’d now decided — mutually, she thought — just to be friends. When he ended up falling asleep on her bed, she changed into pajamas and climbed in next to him. Soon, he was putting his arm around her and taking off her clothes. ‘I basically said, “No, I don’t want to have sex with you.” And then he said, “OK, that’s fine” and stopped. . . . And then he started again a few minutes later, taking off my panties, taking off his boxers. I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.’”
Six weeks later, the woman reported that she had been raped.
If I ever open a legal practice, I will be sure to advise my clients to say they were sleepy in an attempt to excuse their criminal behavior.Any woman that climbs into bed with a man that she has had sex with in the past and expects that there will be no sex has no common sense ( or is currently married to that man ).
Considering that the man was asleep when she got into bed with him, it is very likely that his actions were done in a minimally conscious state, meaning that he was incapable of consenting to the sex they had.
If she was fully conscious of what they were doing and he was in a minimally conscious state, she would have to be considered the rapist according to the current definitions of rape, since she was the only one of the two capable of consenting to the sex or stopping the sex.
Try actually reading something before you make such statements....lest you look a bit biased on this issue. :chuckle:
"I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.’”
Let's just make it again.
If I ever open a legal practice, I will be sure to advise my clients to say they were sleepy in an attempt to excuse their criminal behavior.
Any woman that climbs into bed with a man that she has had sex with in the past and expects that there will be no sex has no common sense ( or is currently married to that man ).
Considering that the man was asleep when she got into bed with him, it is very likely that his actions were done in a minimally conscious state, meaning that he was incapable of consenting to the sex they had.
If she was fully conscious of what they were doing and he was in a minimally conscious state, she would have to be considered the rapist according to the current definitions of rape, since she was the only one of the two capable of consenting to the sex or stopping the sex.
You should hire Idzikowski.If I ever open a legal practice, I will be sure to advise my clients to say they were sleepy in an attempt to excuse their criminal behavior.
consent's a tricky thing - i would be tempted, if i was a lawyer defending the guy in question, to argue that this:
"I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything"
was implied consent
I don't get it. I have never once seen him justify rape....in any of the many threads he's started of late. He has consistently said rape is always WRONG. I don't know about years ago, but not once has he taken any blame away from the rapist for his part in the rape.
Maybe he won't let the topic go because, for some odd reason, people refuse to admit that there are SOME WOMEN who have SOME RESPONSIBILITY of THEIR OWN because of the poor decisions they have made. Bybee, you even said as much, yourself, in one of your posts I quoted.
And, isn't this just another call out thread? :think:
I guess she never heard of a couch or the floor with some blankets ? She asked for it, imo.