Yeppers.That the fault of a criminal act falls on, surprise, the criminal. And that should be the end of it.
Yeppers.That the fault of a criminal act falls on, surprise, the criminal. And that should be the end of it.
Rape occurs for one reason and one reason only: rapists are evil.
Correct, and that should be the end of the conversation.
BINGO!
They are going to rape women no matter what they are wearing, and no matter what they are doing.
That the fault of a criminal act falls on, surprise, the criminal. And that should be the end of it.
I am talking about actual rape victims.and whether everything we call rape is actually rape.
You could be right, if the conversation was about why a rapist rapes.
However, the conversation we are trying to have is: whether there are actions and attitudes in our culture that are creating or provoking rapists and whether everything we call rape is actually rape.
The answer is no because rape has always existed. To say a rapist was "provoked" is an absurd concept.You could be right, if the conversation was about why a rapist rapes.
However, the conversation we are trying to have is: whether there are actions and attitudes in our culture that are creating or provoking rapists and whether everything we call rape is actually rape.
No matter what.It's wrong to rape.
When someone offered their condolences to my daughter, she was quick to say she deserved everything she got.
Many rape victims are children, in fact.
That the fault of a criminal act falls on, surprise, the criminal. And that should be the end of it.
I am talking about actual rape victims.
Bringing in scenario after scenario of non-rape victims is going off course.
And many of the scenarios were not even about rape.Dreaming up all kinds of hideous scenarios about rape
I remember that.Those of us who have been here for a while remember dozer's attempt to blame his wife because they engaged in physical confrontations. He actually bragged about it.
No matter what.
This comparison doesn't fit.insurance companies recognize the role negligence plays in the theft of a car, for example, and they'll deny a claim
that doesn't mean they call the cops and say "don't bother looking for the thief"
... rapists can't help themselves if they are provoked.
Those of us who have been here for a while remember dozer's attempt to blame his wife because they engaged in physical confrontations. He actually bragged about it.
To say a rapist was "provoked" is an absurd concept.
I was referring to a comment made by Genuine Original.nobody is saying that except bybee
Society also counts as marriage many cases that should not be called marriage.society counts as rape many cases that should not be called rape
Society also counts as marriage many cases that should not be called marriage.
What society calls something should not be the determining factor for your definition.
I am assuming that this is the definition you are referring to?I am talking about actual rape
The answer is no because rape has always existed. To say a rapist was "provoked" is an absurd concept.
No matter what.
I was referring to a comment made by Genuine Original.
Herewith, a Philadelphia magazine report about Swarthmore College, where in 2013 a student “was in her room with a guy with whom she’d been hooking up for three months”: “They’d now decided — mutually, she thought — just to be friends. When he ended up falling asleep on her bed, she changed into pajamas and climbed in next to him. Soon, he was putting his arm around her and taking off her clothes. ‘I basically said, “No, I don’t want to have sex with you.” And then he said, “OK, that’s fine” and stopped. . . . And then he started again a few minutes later, taking off my panties, taking off his boxers. I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.’” Six weeks later, the woman reported that she had been raped. |
No, he gave up that excuse when she told him no.my bad
consider the following:
Herewith, a Philadelphia magazine report about Swarthmore College, where in 2013 a student “was in her room with a guy with whom she’d been hooking up for three months”:
“They’d now decided — mutually, she thought — just to be friends. When he ended up falling asleep on her bed, she changed into pajamas and climbed in next to him. Soon, he was putting his arm around her and taking off her clothes. ‘I basically said, “No, I don’t want to have sex with you.” And then he said, “OK, that’s fine” and stopped. . . . And then he started again a few minutes later, taking off my panties, taking off his boxers. I just kind of laid there and didn’t do anything — I had already said no. I was just tired and wanted to go to bed. I let him finish. I pulled my panties back on and went to sleep.’”
Six weeks later, the woman reported that she had been raped.
would you agree that her behavior was provoking, especially the bolded part?