Best point ever made on the Behemoth. Facts are facts. Reptiles don't have belly buttons
Dinosaurs aren't real reptiles.
Best point ever made on the Behemoth. Facts are facts. Reptiles don't have belly buttons
There is some evidence that dino's may have been warm blooded, prey to predator ratio for one. We know they were born from eggs so they would have been more like birds than reptiles. Still no navel. Your position has not improved.Dinosaurs aren't real reptiles.
The Bible describes behemoth and leviathan, which might well be dinos. What needs to improve?Your position has not improved.
They might also be elephants or hypos or blue whales or giant squid. Those two words only indicate that large animals existed yet gives not clue as to what they may have been.The Bible describes behemoth and leviathan, which might well be dinos. What needs to improve?
Only if you can't read.They might also be elephants or hypos or blue whales or giant squid.
Nope. There are whole passages dedicated to describing them, ruling out any of your farcical ideas. :chuckle:Those two words only indicate that large animals existed yet gives not clue as to what they may have been.
Only if you can't read.
Let me guess: Evolutionist, right?Nope. There are whole passages dedicated to describing them, ruling out any of your farcical ideas. :chuckle:
Old Earth Creationist.Only if you can't read.
Let me guess: Evolutionist, right?Nope. There are whole passages dedicated to describing them, ruling out any of your farcical ideas. :chuckle:
Sorry Stripe. Those two are most definitely not dinosaurs
Only if you can't read.
Let me guess: Evolutionist, right?Nope. There are whole passages dedicated to describing them, ruling out any of your farcical ideas. :chuckle:
Puts an end to your retarded notion that it could be a squid. :up:Apparently leviathan's are fire breathing dragons.
On the bright side, squid are at least real. Fire breathing dragons, well, I'll wait for you to provide some evidence of one outside of Job.Puts an end to your retarded notion that it could be a squid. :up:
I love it when evolutionists destroy their own nonsense arguments.
And we notice you've dropped the navel argument. :chuckle:
Evolutionists hate reading.I'll wait for you to provide some evidence.
But you won't explain your assertion. :idunno:
On the bright side, squid are at least real. Fire breathing dragons, well, I'll wait for you to provide some evidence of one outside of Job.
It ... has external stones.
Where did you get that from?
And that tells you they were outside, how?the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
Also notice that it says the trees cover him with their shadow. Any large quadrupedal dinosaur would not have been covered by modern trees, save California's redwoods. Add in the part where "his nose pierceth through snares," and you got a rhino
Because they were visible. If they were internal, like a dinosaur's, you couldn't see them. Go to your local zoo and try to find the "stones" on a crocodile.And that tells you they were outside, how?
To go further, no trees in the history of the Middle East were big enough to cover a sauropod dinosaur.Lucky they didn't rely on today's trees then, huh?
And regardless, he spent his time sitting in water.
Who hates reading? I asked you to provide evidence outside of Job. And you cite Job. Try again only this time answer the question that was actually asked.Evolutionists hate reading.
Evidence already provided. The Bible describes leviathan and behemoth, which could be dinos. Evidence that they coexisted with men.
Are all Darwinists this stupid, or is it only you?
It doesn't say they were visible. It says the sinews were tightly bound.Because they were visible.
All because you say so?To go further, no trees in the history of the Middle East were big enough to cover a sauropod dinosaur.
:darwinsm: Keeping your options open, aren't you? Which of those has a "tail like a cedar"? That should narrow things down. :chuckle:Sounds a lot like what elephants, rhinos, and hippos do on a hot day.