This is a false dichotomy.
You are assuming that there would be no benefit for the courts to just ignore the evidence, or even just that they all hate Trump.
Dems are trying to steal the election with voter fraud
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
This is a false dichotomy.
You are assuming that there would be no benefit for the courts to just ignore the evidence, or even just that they all hate Trump.
If all the judges were Democrats, or Liberals, and there wasn't a single Trump appointee among them- then maybe you'd have a case. As it is, it seems rather unlikely, to say the least. Unless you are so caught up in a world of conspiracy theories and only read extreme right wing news sources (yes- the 'if you'd only get your news from sources besides CNN' argument works both ways).
Seriously- you expected the courts to throw out millions of votes because of some unauthenticated complaints? If the 'Dems' had tried this, you'd be screaming your heads off.
This whole "we were cheated' thing was always ridiculous. Now it is ridiculous and old.
Put up a decent candidate in 2024 and win, rather than bellyaching about a clear loss in 2020. Nikki Haley would be a great candidate.
Michigan legislature committees subpoena election evidence from Detroit and nearby suburb
“Election integrity should not be a partisan issue, this information needs to be preserved,” State Senator Ruth Johnson said
That's it? Your understand your case to be based on who appointed the judge? Even after knowing that GOP appointees John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, John Roberts, Samuel Alito were/are flaming liberals? And William Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, and Clarence Thomas were/are only slightly better? Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and ACB are in the same mold as the last three I listed here, but they haven't done much so we don't know if they will become just another stab-sanity-in-the-back liberal like those listed first.
Remember, judges all come from the pool of lawyers which have to prove they are bad people to be allowed. At least the mafia is honest about it and they require new members to murder someone to join the upper levels of their criminal organizations.
Haley, IMO, is another trump loyalist. Maybe Liz Cheney.
That's unfair, it's only 99 % of bad lawyers that give the rest a bad name. Allegedly!
Liz Cheney and Nikki Haley being conservative. ROFL. You must think anyone who doesn't want to murder Donald Trump is a Trump loyalist.
Maricopa county is refusing to turn over subpoenaed evidence:
justthenews.com
Maricopa County refuses to comply with Arizona legislative subpoena for election evidence
Board for state’s largest county, encompassing Phoenix, votes 4-1 to go to court to fight turning over ballot data and machines.
That really looks like old creepy Joe sure won a lot more of the country than Trump! LOL.
Kinda looks like he slopped his dripper.
Did you see one of the assertions of the Maricopa county board of supervisor's? That it would possibly harm voter privacy. LOL. A couple of years after an election that's all public information anyway.Maricopa county is refusing to turn over subpoenaed evidence:
Maricopa County refuses to comply with Arizona legislative subpoena for election evidence
Board for state’s largest county, encompassing Phoenix, votes 4-1 to go to court to fight turning over ballot data and machines.
Yeah, the Democratic party elites are just such hard working honest people. They're just out to protect the voters, never themselves. And they do anything they can do to help keep things like elections transparent. They never fight to hide anything from the people. They just make my heart do flip flops with all their goodness....
musterion
Well-known member
The corrupted, treasonous, globally controlled puppet bureaucracy is so massive, so diffuse, and so faceless, it need do only one thing to defend itself from what would otherwise be necessary reforms if not lethal attacks:
Nothing.
Police ignore criminals.
Mayors ignore rioters.
Governors ignore vote theft.
Courts ignore evidence.
The connected ignore courts.
Department heads ignore legitimate directives.
Representatives ignore their base.
They all ignore the Constitution, and us, because they can hide within the bureaucracy or endlessly cover for each other.
Nothing comes of it. No one is held to account, nor apparently (so far) can be.
Here's hoping something may yet happen to shake the earth beneath their feet and restore Justice For All, but we are near the bottom of the ninth.
Nothing.
Police ignore criminals.
Mayors ignore rioters.
Governors ignore vote theft.
Courts ignore evidence.
The connected ignore courts.
Department heads ignore legitimate directives.
Representatives ignore their base.
They all ignore the Constitution, and us, because they can hide within the bureaucracy or endlessly cover for each other.
Nothing comes of it. No one is held to account, nor apparently (so far) can be.
Here's hoping something may yet happen to shake the earth beneath their feet and restore Justice For All, but we are near the bottom of the ninth.
As usual you completely ignore the evidence and try to change the subject. Evidence is meaningless to you. You're definitely the CCP guy.
I'm not changing the topic in the least. The idea of Martial law came up at the White House, as a way of overcoming the supposed fraud in the elections. Some here have suggested go to the ammo box if the ballot box is 'wrong'. Are you in favor of either of those steps?