Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside

rocketman

rocketman

Resident Rocket Surgeon
Hall of Fame
kmoney said:
Honest question. What would you do if the roles were reversed? Would you vote for Trump or vote 3rd party or skip it entirely?
Click to expand...

I assume meaning if I were a democrat no? Well I am not a republican either, because I believe that republicans are part of the same corrupt system that the Democrats are, the other side of the same coin if you will but, the fact that democrats are a full blown marxist/socialist entity I cannot imagine ever being aligned with that, or being in their shoes so to speak. I will say that if the tables were turned I would vote to make sure the criminal element never was allowed to serve in any public office, and yes, even if it meant voting democrat but, that is not the case. I would like to say that it was republicans in concert with democrats that moved to impeach Richard Nixon and the lack of any outrage that not only was their chosen candidate (Sanders) cheated before he even started his presidential bid, the supporters i.e. citizens that monetarily supported Sanders were robbed of their money & voice, and as it continues come out that their current candidate is a criminal...still they support the lawless criminal element. Really it shows how dirty the democrat party really is from the party leadership to those holding office, that they will stop at nothing to hold power over the people while looting everyone in the process....It is sickening.
 
kmoney

kmoney

New member
Hall of Fame
rocketman said:
I assume meaning if I were a democrat no? Well I am not a republican either, because I believe that republicans are part of the same corrupt system that the Democrats are, the other side of the same coin if you will but, the fact that democrats are a full blown marxist/socialist entity I cannot imagine ever being aligned with that, or being in their shoes so to speak. I will say that if the tables were turned I would vote to make sure the criminal element never was allowed to serve in any public office, and yes, even if it meant voting democrat but, that is not the case. I would like to say that it was republicans in concert with democrats that moved to impeach Richard Nixon and the lack of any outrage that not only was their chosen candidate (Sanders) cheated before he even started his presidential bid, the supporters i.e. citizens that monetarily supported Sanders were robbed of their money & voice, and as it continues come out that their current candidate is a criminal...still they support the lawless criminal element. Really it shows how dirty the democrat party really is from the party leadership to those holding office, that they will stop at nothing to hold power over the people while looting everyone in the process....It is sickening.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I meant if Trump was the criminal and Clinton wasn't.
 
rocketman

rocketman

Resident Rocket Surgeon
Hall of Fame
kmoney said:
Sorry, I meant if Trump was the criminal and Clinton wasn't.
Click to expand...

I think my answer suffices for both scenarios but, I certainly would not vote for a criminal or anyone that was under multiple federal criminal investigations. Just would not do it under any circumstances.
 
Crucible

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Ktoyou said:
Maybe the Brexit voters will move here?
Click to expand...

The Brexit was unjustified. 52 to 48, rigged by liberal pollsters to persuade the ignorant.
This is in part the reason why the US has mechanisms in place for those sort of things, but the UK doesn't care- they embrace tyranny of majority even if the majority isn't really there :rolleyes:

I think it suits US libs very well. Exit out of America :chuckle:
 
ok doser

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
the news on the cbc this morning was that the referendum isn't binding - no brexit until it's passed by the parliament


iirc, artie wuz making a whole buncha noise the other day about britain having left the eu in 2016 :darwinsm:
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
ok doser said:
the news on the cbc this morning was that the referendum isn't binding - no brexit until it's passed by the parliament


iirc, artie wuz making a whole buncha noise the other day about britain having left the eu in 2016 :darwinsm:
Click to expand...

Well, I didn't actually say any such thing. I did comment that Britain wasn't likely to officially leave the EU until around 2018 as it sure wasn't going to happen the day after the majority of Britain voted to exit. The above is pretty standard procedure over here and it's highly unlikely that Parliament won't pass the legislation.

Still, maybe if you weren't so busy trolling for a certain poster's attention on here you'd have more time to avail yourself of standard political practice and less time showing your ignorance and in the penalty box.

:e4e:
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Crucible said:
The Brexit was unjustified. 52 to 48, rigged by liberal pollsters to persuade the ignorant.
This is in part the reason why the US has mechanisms in place for those sort of things, but the UK doesn't care- they embrace tyranny of majority even if the majority isn't really there :rolleyes:

I think it suits US libs very well. Exit out of America :chuckle:
Click to expand...

Hmm, since when were you an expert on the UK voting system? It was obvious it was going to be a close run thing over here no matter what 'side' won on the issue. If you think it was rigged and without safeguards in place then you're just clueless.
 
Crucible

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Arthur Brain said:
Hmm, since when were you an expert on the UK voting system? It was obvious it was going to be a close run thing over here no matter what 'side' won on the issue. If you think it was rigged and without safeguards in place then you're just clueless.
Click to expand...

Your boy Milo and all those alt righties seem to think otherwise, and they've voiced it not just on the media but right to your media's face :chuckle:

The US has a different approach to those matters. It takes a 75% vote for extreme, permanent changes, which most often is with the Constitution but not exclusive to such.

You see, the Founders of America were sure to put mechanisms in place to help deter sleight corruptions and tyranny of majority. Obviously, that does not exist over there because that would not fly over here :rolleyes:
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Crucible said:
Your boy Milo and all those alt righties seem to think otherwise, and they've voiced it not just on the media but right to your media's face :chuckle:

The US has a different approach to those matters. It takes a 75% vote for extreme, permanent changes, which most often is with the Constitution but not exclusive to such.

You see, the Founders of America were sure to put mechanisms in place to help deter sleight corruptions and tyranny of majority. Obviously, that does not exist over there because that would not fly over here :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

And?

Dude, you probably think the London Underground is a political movement...
 
Crucible

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
Arthur Brain said:
From here on in you'd be better off just bringing silence...

:plain:
Click to expand...

misc-got-a-badass-over-here.png


I bet you could kill two stones with one bird
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top