Thanks once again for confusing your delusions with facts ... and for verifying my statement:
Rusha said:
Cruz to announce Fiorina as running mate
- Thread starter serpentdove
- Start date
Thanks once again for confusing your delusions with facts ... and for verifying my statement:
:think:
Can you name one thing that women, collectively, are better at than men?
I seem to recall stumping y'all with that :chuckle:
MISOGYNY
is all you had to say. As was expected. I can see why you don't like Trump, who pretty much said the same exact thing. And to think all those women supporting him nonetheless
lain:
Considering you have been posting the same misogynistic nonsense for years, why would I or anyone else waste their time with your selective listening and reasoning *skills*?
Apparently you have forgotten your prior rants and whines about women always winning in family court. We all get that you do not like it when women have opportunities or hold positions of power, however, you have only yourself to blame. Your "speeches" are motivational.
Do you have a stasis tank? If so, you've been spending too much time in it
For whatever reason you've been doing just that, I suppose.
Apparently you have forgotten your prior rants and whines about women always winning in family court. We all get that you do not like it when women have opportunities or hold positions of power, however, you have only yourself to blame. Your "speeches" are motivational.
So..
Women are better at manipulating others for their own gain.
Thanks for clearing up the obvious.
Now, liberal men are to blame. I motivate men to see this for what it is, while another man somewhere right now is losing their home and kids because of the rotten luck of being a working husband in feminized society.
And women aren't given 'opportunities'.
They are just 'given'.
You see, it's the difference between 'equity' and 'forced equality'- men among each other live in 'equity'. You all can't hack it, and embrace the latter while calling it the other.
That's the problem.
Right. On. Cue. You keep verifying my statement:
Rusha said:
In the case of Palin, I didn't like her. ... she is one of the main reasons McCain lost. In the case of Fiorina, I don't dislike her. She is certainly an upgrade as compared to Palin. IF she were to be Cruz's running mate, his motivation would be the same as McCain's. He would be picking her in hopes of attracting women voters. It won't work ... even though she is more qualified than Palin ...
McCain lost because he was another Bush.
And this is exhibit A of why men are better than women at making informed decisions on leadership.
A CEO of a computer company.
I mean, really.. and y'all are going to hate on Trump
lain:
No ... he lost primarily *because* of Palin and because *of Bush*. Thank you, once again, for giving me the opportunity to correct you.
carly is a good choice
-I would rather listen to her
-you need a woman to attack another woman
-no one does it better than carly
-I would rather listen to her
-you need a woman to attack another woman
-no one does it better than carly
No ... he lost primarily *because* of Palin and because *of Bush*. Thank you, once again, for giving me the opportunity to correct you.
Nah
It was because he was another Bush.
Obama didn't win by a landslide due to Palin, they won by a landslide because the Right has been cursed ever since 9/11 and the only way it can redeem itself is by dropping people like Carly and Ted.
Which they will, when Trump is President. Cruz will be better as VP, only if that must be the case, and Carly will do great right back at HP :wave:
With the exception of "need a woman to attack another woman", I would agree with you. I like Carly as well, however, she isn't running for president and Cruz's motives for picking her will be seen as manipulative.
Yeah.
You don't rant about women nearly enough. Perhaps you can start a *separate* thread about it ... instead of trolling this one.
Uh, you're the one that started it, retard
lain:You should go make a thread with a list of things men aren't better than women at. Prove this 'equality', and why it should be burdened unto men.
Don't worry, I will wait until the Earth opens and the trumpets boom
Uh, you're the one that started it, retard
:chuckle: Your emotional instability and lack of self control actually verifies my point. Thank you.
You should go make a thread with a list of things men aren't better than women at.
No thank you. It's your issue, not mine.
Because you can't.
You want men to live in pretend land.
Reality = Misogyny
Deuces :wave:
Can't WHAT? What on earth are you babbling on about now? I am not going to waste my time *proving* your unsubstantiated, little opinion is wrong. That would the equivalent of asking Stevie Wonder to choose the color I should paint my house.
:chuckle: Not hardly. Actual men have no need to live in your *pretend land*. They do not see women as threatening ... or as the enemy.
It's unfortunate that Carly being a possible running mate with Cruz gets you this worked up.
Say it three times in the mirror, and Lena Dunham will pop out and make it go away :idunno:
I don't see women as an 'enemy'. I see them as 'abysmally oblivious'.
I don't really care about Carly, you're just making things up now, as per usual. If she were a man, she'd be back at HP headquarters playing solitaire. Women get into places all the time less qualified because of 'equality'- Don't like that 'unsubstantiated claim'? Sue me.
But don't spread this falsehood that I'm 'worked up'- I'm barely paying attention to you, you all are time killers today.
No ... once is enough. Your *endorsement* is an extra confirmation.
It would actually be in women's best interest if they didn't support Carly. All Cruz is doing is getting someone on board who has a sharp tongue to slander Trump- but because of your dumb feminism, you don't actually see things the way they are. You think she's 'cut out' for the job.
:nono:
It's Teddie's last shenanigan.