I do believe in the creator....the God of Abraham. He created a lot of flexibility into his creation and he is not a authoritarian. He did not create things to stay static and not change. He also did not create things to be what humans call "perfect". He set up some laws and created some boundary conditions and then largely let it fall into place. One of those boundary conditions were slight variations in quantum fields? I cannot remember what the term was exactly. I know that these variations were responsible for allowing matter to form in clumps like we see today. He let things largely progress on their own without his interference. This is exactly how he operates today. But, he didn't just let any possible thing happen that could happen. He set up guidelines and he stepped in at particular times to make sure events matched up with his guidelines. This left room for a whole lot of variability. Your god made things a certain way(plain vanilla) with no ability to adapt or change. He is a static god.
Nope.
The god of this world is a liar.
And if Michaels angels told him the universe is expanding, they are too.
Well Michael...yes, in some ways its difficulty to understand. But, in other ways, we should expect people will reject God and His Word.
Yes....the odds are 100% because God made the earth habitable. His Word, and science show earth is a very specially designed place.
The Big Bang is contradictory to Gods Word, in many ways.
Other galaxies and black holes??? I. Dont I think my Bible says that.
But one thing the Bible does say about the stars that is quite fascinating is that they are as in numerical as this sands of the seashore. At a time when some people thought there was less stars than grains of sand in 1 bucket-- God was saying that the number of stars was on a scale they couldn't imagine. Today we know there are more stars in the heavens than grains of sand from all the ocean shores in the world.
And another cool thing Gods Word tells us is that God created each star unique.
As you say... There is no such thing as a simple cell. Advances in microbiology have shown the incomprehensible complexity of the living cell. A few years ago, scientists decided to try simulate one of the smallest known genomes of any organism (525 gene). The scientists had "a cluster of 128 computers running for 9 to 10 hours to actually generate the data on the 25 categories of molecules that are involved in the cell's lifecycle processes."We have go back to the first "simple" cell ....
Cells degenerate, break down, gradually wear out over time. They go from a state of order to less order--disorder, and even death. Information for replication dissipates in one way or another. This is entropy.
We have go back to the first "simple" cell in the evolution of life. The early cells were of course not "simple" in that they were not complex, but were simple in that as they evolved they became more complex as more information is added over time. But that would negate entropy.
The cell cannot be "open" to the addition of more information if it is moving toward less information--entropy.
The information in a genetic code must come all at once.
--Dave
NY Times?
Really?
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times,
Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
David Rockefeller... Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
NY Times?
Really?
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times,
Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.
The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
David Rockefeller... Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
I didn't say information was effected by gravity, it's effected by entropy, a break down not a building up, as an analogy.
--Dave
The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases, because isolated systems always evolve toward thermodynamic equilibrium— a state depending on the maximum entropy.
Nope.
The god of this world is a liar.
And if Michaels angels told him the universe is expanding, they are too.
Dear Tyrathca,
It's not that broken. Just click on the "Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun..." picture and you can read the article about it. It's not broken at all beyond getting to see the article I'm speaking of. Try again!!
Michael
Nope, I click the link and get a NY times page saying:
"Page Not Found
We're sorry; we seem to have lost this page,
but we don't want to lose you."
Also... Re "simple cells"... Have you seen some of the animations done by Harvard university, or Oasis, or others of the 'manufacturing city' within a cell. They are awesome evidence of the Creator
Just as water flows downward so does information from a "gene pool".
Get the point now?
--Dave