Zeke
Well-known member
Horn———-what an obtuse statement. Learn a little about mature verbal exchange.
Like this? Warning this has graphic language from Carlin but spot on as is JFK.
Horn———-what an obtuse statement. Learn a little about mature verbal exchange.
Yes it does.
Two people can observe the same thing and come away with different conclusions.
It's not hard to understand.
Yes it is.
What's the use of gathering patterns if you are not going to make a conclusion about those patterns?
One can find some patterns of Trump that show him not to be a narcissist, and some that do.
One can find some patterns of Trump being sexist and some of Trump not being sexist.
Nope.
You can play TV and internet analysis if you want to.
No matter who does, there are going to be differences of opinion.
Trump IS the best !! But you are tied for first !!!Check out this video! Trump is the best!
Like this? Warning this has graphic language from Carlin but spot on as is JFK.
make another post quick - you're on 666I am pretty sure you mistook me for you!!!
Danoh Differs - he begs to differ :chuckle:Lol - even the statement "things that differ are not the same" is a statement based on the observation of recurrent patterns.
How that "these recurrent ones over here differ from those recurrent ones over there."
But I'll drop this matter as you not only do not know what you are talking about as to this issue; apparantly are convinced you do; but just as apparantly have no interest in learning about it.
It's been your recurrent pattern any time I have brought it up :chuckle:
A more objective individual - not one so set in her ways about one thing or another - would ask herself where such things might possibly the case.
You - an indivudual who believes that Paul is our "pattern."
Luv ya anyway, but you're staring right past these things...that differ.
:doh: :chuckle:
Zeke,
There is a problem with the vulgar language in George Carlin's part. I bet you could have found JFK without the foul-mouthed dude.
Horn———-what an obtuse statement. Learn a little about mature verbal exchange.
Our #country is #hurting and #divided because of this #election. It is the job of us all to produce #healing through #compassion and #love. It is only through #compassion for one another that this #country will #heal and will be #great again.
https://soundcloud.com/freedomsfortress/episode-5-compassion-will-make-america-great-again
Socialism is stealing, socialists are thieves. Their con game has been stopped (to a degree and for a while) just when they expected to get to move into the fast lane. I have no compassion for those who are whining cry babies because they're scared that they and their consituents won't get to suck my life's blood to survive while hating me for bleeding.
This is what real compassion looks like...
2 Thessalonians 3:10 For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat.
Suggest that to the President-elect.
Grosnick, a number of distinguished American psychiatrists and psychologists have analyzed Trump's personality , and they have called him a narcissistic sociopath . I didn't make this stuff up. You can google this yourself easily .
Earlier this week the American Psychiatric Association cautioned psychiatrists against taking part in a feverish new national hobby. Catching Pokémon wasn't mentioned. Psychoanalyzing Donald Trump was. On the organization's website, APA President Maria A. Oquendo wrote: "The unique atmosphere of this year's election cycle may lead some to want to psychoanalyze the candidates, but to do so would not only be unethical, it would be irresponsible." Oquendo was referring to the "Goldwater Rule," a guideline adopted by the APA after a 1964 survey of psychiatrists found that nearly half of those polled felt that GOP presidential candidate Barry Goldwater was psychologically unfit to be president. The rule states that despite the shiny diagnostic T-ball Trump has propped in front of them — his volatility, his grandiosity, his entitlement — professional code holds that if they haven't performed an in-person evaluation, psychiatrists should keep quiet on the mental character of public figures (unless of course they have that person's permission to speak out). http://www.npr.org/sections/health-...rain-from-armchair-analysis-of-public-figures |