Compassion will make America great again!

Danoh

New member
Yes it does.
Two people can observe the same thing and come away with different conclusions.

It's not hard to understand.

Yes it is.
What's the use of gathering patterns if you are not going to make a conclusion about those patterns?

One can find some patterns of Trump that show him not to be a narcissist, and some that do.
One can find some patterns of Trump being sexist and some of Trump not being sexist.

Nope.
You can play TV and internet analysis if you want to.
No matter who does, there are going to be differences of opinion.

Lol - even the statement "things that differ are not the same" is a statement based on the observation of recurrent patterns.

How that "these recurrent ones over here differ from those recurrent ones over there."

But I'll drop this matter as you not only do not know what you are talking about as to this issue; apparantly are convinced you do; but just as apparantly have no interest in learning about it.

It's been your recurrent pattern any time I have brought it up :chuckle:

A more objective individual - not one so set in her ways about one thing or another - would ask herself where such things might possibly the case.

You - an indivudual who believes that Paul is our "pattern."

Luv ya anyway, but you're staring right past these things...that differ.

:doh: :chuckle:
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Lol - even the statement "things that differ are not the same" is a statement based on the observation of recurrent patterns.

How that "these recurrent ones over here differ from those recurrent ones over there."

But I'll drop this matter as you not only do not know what you are talking about as to this issue; apparantly are convinced you do; but just as apparantly have no interest in learning about it.

It's been your recurrent pattern any time I have brought it up :chuckle:

A more objective individual - not one so set in her ways about one thing or another - would ask herself where such things might possibly the case.

You - an indivudual who believes that Paul is our "pattern."

Luv ya anyway, but you're staring right past these things...that differ.

:doh: :chuckle:
Danoh Differs - he begs to differ :chuckle:
 

Zeke

Well-known member
Zeke,

There is a problem with the vulgar language in George Carlin's part. I bet you could have found JFK without the foul-mouthed dude.

I warned ya, Carlin told the truth which is why I included it, words only offend the ego if you let them.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Our #country is #hurting and #divided because of this #election. It is the job of us all to produce #healing through #compassion and #love. It is only through #compassion for one another that this #country will #heal and will be #great again.

https://soundcloud.com/freedomsfortress/episode-5-compassion-will-make-america-great-again

Socialism is stealing, socialists are thieves. Their con game has been stopped (to a degree and for a while) just when they expected to get to move into the fast lane. I have no compassion for those who are whining cry babies because they're scared that they and their consituents won't get to suck my life's blood to survive while hating me for bleeding.

This is what real compassion looks like...

2 Thessalonians 3:10 For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat.
 

Grosnick Marowbe

New member
Hall of Fame
Socialism is stealing, socialists are thieves. Their con game has been stopped (to a degree and for a while) just when they expected to get to move into the fast lane. I have no compassion for those who are whining cry babies because they're scared that they and their consituents won't get to suck my life's blood to survive while hating me for bleeding.

This is what real compassion looks like...

2 Thessalonians 3:10 For even when we were with you, we commanded you this: If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat.

Good post Clete.
 

Crucible

BANNED
Banned
You know what I find ridiculous?

This whole "election divided the country".

No

The Left has caused division of this country for years, calling everyone against them any derogatory label they can muster. They were, as far as they eye can see, trying to defunct any Americans contrary to them.

So I'm not even trying to hear of this scapegoating on Trump or the intent of people voting for them, I think that a good third of this country has some accountability to take and needs to stop acting like a bunch of hurt schoolgirls.
 

theophilus

Well-known member
@op:

The only thing that will make this country truly great again would be putting God first in everything. In our current state we have signed ourselves up for His judgement and wrath.

The Church (Bride) needs to step up and tell the world what great things the Lord our God has done for us.

We sorely need a national revival...nay, a global revival, and I pray it will begin with me.

:)
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
After having actually listening to the radio program, it's worse even than I thought.

The pastor doing the show very simply doesn't know what he's talking about. The point he's making is that all these cry babies are scared of Trump in a manner similar to the way we were all scared when Obama won. He says that we should communicate to the leftists that it's going to be okay, no one is going to take away their freedoms and if they do, we'll be right there next to them fighting for their freedoms.

There are so many problems with this that I'm not sure where to start.

First of all, it is liberalism that takes away people's freedoms, not the right. When the right was all freaked out and frightened of what Obama would do to this country it's because there was good reason to be frightened. It's the reason why Rush Limbaugh said that he hoped Obama would fail. The fact that Obama did not fail is precisely the reason why the left got their hat handed to them on election day. You can thank liberal government policies for every major problem this country has (whether it was Republican or Demoncrat leftism). Everything from unaffordable health insurance to the national debt to bad trade policies to a near non-existent southern border to perverts in the bathroom with your daughters. All of it is the left. And this election was a collective thumb in the eye of the left-wing's globalism and anything goes social agenda.

I'm out of time but suffice it to say that this pastor needs to figure out that there is no moral equivalence between the left and the right. They are different. This country was founded on right-wing political concepts and that the left is not just a danger, it is an immoral domestic and spiritual enemy.


Resting in Him,
Clete
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Grosnick, a number of distinguished American psychiatrists and psychologists have analyzed Trump's personality , and they have called him a narcissistic sociopath . I didn't make this stuff up. You can google this yourself easily .

and in doing so, they violated the recommendations of their regulating body

unlike you, I provide actual proof for my claim:


Earlier this week the American Psychiatric Association cautioned psychiatrists against taking part in a feverish new national hobby.

Catching Pokémon wasn't mentioned. Psychoanalyzing Donald Trump was.

On the organization's website, APA President Maria A. Oquendo wrote: "The unique atmosphere of this year's election cycle may lead some to want to psychoanalyze the candidates, but to do so would not only be unethical, it would be irresponsible."

Oquendo was referring to the "Goldwater Rule," a guideline adopted by the APA after a 1964 survey of psychiatrists found that nearly half of those polled felt that GOP presidential candidate Barry Goldwater was psychologically unfit to be president.

The rule states that despite the shiny diagnostic T-ball Trump has propped in front of them — his volatility, his grandiosity, his entitlement — professional code holds that if they haven't performed an in-person evaluation, psychiatrists should keep quiet on the mental character of public figures (unless of course they have that person's permission to speak out).


http://www.npr.org/sections/health-...rain-from-armchair-analysis-of-public-figures




i understand that you want to believe what these people have to say, and that you want to trade on their expertise

but you're doing so from "experts" who are acting unethically, irresponsibly and unprofessionally
 
Top