You are the most brainwashed, extreme leftist I've ever conversed with.
You're an inverted aCW :chuckle:
Compassion will make America great again!
- Thread starter jzeidler
- Start date
You are the most brainwashed, extreme leftist I've ever conversed with.
You're an inverted aCW :chuckle:
:listen: Someone needs to return to Psychology 101. Pr 8:36, Ex 20:14
It's mourning :greedy: in America (Pr 29:2). :5020:
I didnt vote for trump, but i see liberal "goons" causing damage and acting like babies, not trump supporters.
:mock: Trump protesters
Apparantly, you did your homework on the man.
You'll note that none of his supporters appear to know his life-long history of corruption, etc.
But, they have brought the obvious on themselves.
How biligerant they become when ever anything objective is said about their false idol; is not going to change that.
Same old, same old.
:chuckle:
Last edited:
Yep; you did your research :thumb:
Ever hear of Cialdini's Commitment Consistency Principle?
You're dealing with its' victims - in both Clinton's and Trump's supporters.
Click...whirr.
Last edited:
From watching him on TV?
Some act as though one must have a strictly a black and white personality that never varies.
Narcissism can be beneficial sometimes.
A time and place for everything.
The writer of that piece clearly does not know the difference between a balanced self and other esteem...and the imbalance that is narcissism, or self-esteem at the expense of esteem for others.
That writer's is the same incompetence as confusing arrogance (relies on the the unhealthy codependent subservience of others) with strength (believes in a healthy interdependence with others).
Sort of like the difference between a strong person, and an overbearing one.
The wisdom between all extremes is not found in the extreme black or its other extreme - white - but in that shade of gray between extremes that all extremes end up to the left or right of.
The intolerance of objectivity I see in many on these threads many foolishly delude themselves is out of their objectivity is nothing more than their long since self-induced blindness to each their extreme of black or white.
Trump played them like a fiddle through that.
There is no reasoning with such.
It's referred to as Behavioral Modeling through the recurrent (repetitive) behavioral patterns of a thing.
It is the very core of all science.
We all use it.
Only haphazardly - because we're not consciously aware of its' principles and thus, of when we are properly applying them and when we are not.
Once recognized and practiced, they become automatic.
Of course, talk of such things to someone not only unaware of such things, but with no real curiosity about them, and the result is much like what the Apostle Paul said to the Corinthians not only about where he was coming, but about their ignorance in where they could only misconclude he was coming from, in their willful...ignorance.
Where he ended with saying...
1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. 2:15 But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. 2:16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.
Though he could read them; they were clueless in reading him.
Because where he was looking at things from was from within the mind of Christ on things that the Spirit had revealed to his spirit.
In contrast, they were looking at things from where the natural man looks at things from, and as a result, concludes such things foolishness.
1 Corinthians 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.
When you think on it, he was going by their recurrent patterns of behavior as looked at by him through the mind of Christ on things.
As when the Lord had noted that a tree is known by its' fruit.
All sciences are a Behavioral Science - the study of the connection between this thing and that over there, that together and repeatedly...begin to reveal a pattern that opens a window to the mind of another, to the person trained in such things...to its inner life; to what is going on inside that is resulting in its' external result.
As in the phrase "a pattern of corruption."
After a while, it is not too difficult to discern when someone is lying, or what have you.
Because it is just a matter of learning what to look for and then building a model of it right there on the spot each time, from the person's own patterns even as the person manifests said patterns.
Try that with your grandchildren sometime
I know.
So Trump wasn't an actual observed patient of his, he just got all his info from watching Trump on TV.
One can interpret "patterns" in just about anyone to conclude just about anything you want to say about them.
Obsession. By Danoh
No, Tam. It does not work that way.
You are commenting on this from what you don't know about it.
It is not a matter of interpreting patterns at first.
Rather, of identifying them (sort of like right division), categorizing them into different patterns, testing their accuracy before concluding on them, and only then applying them.
Would you like an example you can try out?
That you might - test the things that differ?
You remain...the fool.
That has been your recurrent pattern :chuckle:
Try to learn something new for once - break your recurrent pattern of misreading another's recurrent patterns who you well know is one sharp individual.
Not for my sake; I could care less about that.
But for yours.
:doh:
Yes it does.
Two people can observe the same thing and come away with different conclusions.
It's not hard to understand.
Yes it is.
What's the use of gathering patterns if you are not going to make a conclusion about those patterns?
One can find some patterns of Trump that show him not to be a narcissist, and some that do.
One can find some patterns of Trump being sexist and some of Trump not being sexist.
Nope.
You can play TV and internet analysis if you want to.
No matter who does, there are going to be differences of opinion.
That is his recurrent pattern.