I think so. The notion that there is an objective reality, not subject to man's wishes, is what they seem to find so objectionable.
climate hockey stick defeated
- Thread starter way 2 go
- Start date
I think so. The notion that there is an objective reality, not subject to man's wishes, is what they seem to find so objectionable.
eider
Well-known member
Maybe I'll get an explanation from such a person?
way 2 go
Well-known member
how quickly you forget
Michael Mann tried to pretend his graph was "objective reality"
Dr. Tim Ball called him on his lie
Michael Mann sued Dr. Tim Ball and lost .
:carryon:
Barbarian chuckles:
I think so. The notion that there is an objective reality, not subject to man's wishes, is what they seem to find so objectionable.
You've already forgotten that Ball doctored those graph, changing scales to hide his dishonesty. Look again. Remember when I showed you that?
Whatever thelawyers did, his trickery is right there for anyone willing to think for himself.
Are you?
I think so. The notion that there is an objective reality, not subject to man's wishes, is what they seem to find so objectionable.
You've already forgotten that Ball doctored those graph, changing scales to hide his dishonesty. Look again. Remember when I showed you that?
Whatever thelawyers did, his trickery is right there for anyone willing to think for himself.
Are you?
Ironically, while they were telling us that there was no warming, they were preparing to deal with climate warming up.
eider
Well-known member
how quickly you forget
Michael Mann tried to pretend his graph was "objective reality"
Dr. Tim Ball called him on his lie
Michael Mann sued Dr. Tim Ball and lost .
:carryon:
What? Mann and Ball? Of course I forgot, I dumped that and some of us started to focus upon sea level rise, increased meteorological activity, surges etc, and lists of what we in Europe are doing at this time.
Yeah, I forgot that case immediately. I'm about as interested in a civil case as the sea is, or the weather.
But if you have any evidence to show the we have wasted our time, money and efforts in, say, the UK, please show it.
So you and others diverted the topic of the thread to talk about something only tangentially related?
way 2 go
Well-known member
what good will it do ?
so many failed predictions
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions
-
-
way 2 go
Well-known member
are you ?
Michael Mann lied with his chart
ipcc used his chart because it fit their narrative
and you will believe what you want to believe
regardless of the lack of evidence .
Barbarian chuckles:
I think so. The notion that there is an objective reality, not subject to man's wishes, is what they seem to find so objectionable.
You've already forgotten that Ball doctored those graph, changing scales to hide his dishonesty. Look again. Remember when I showed you that?
Whatever thelawyers did, his trickery is right there for anyone willing to think for himself.
Are you?
Denial isn't really doing much good for you.
I think so. The notion that there is an objective reality, not subject to man's wishes, is what they seem to find so objectionable.
You've already forgotten that Ball doctored those graph, changing scales to hide his dishonesty. Look again. Remember when I showed you that?
Whatever thelawyers did, his trickery is right there for anyone willing to think for himself.
Are you?
Denial isn't really doing much good for you.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
eider
Well-known member
I thought that the central subject was climate change?
And it certainly did seem to me that a civil action between two doctors was being held up as the truth of and about climate change? And of course it is not, hence my posts sought to show this.
eider
Well-known member
what good will it do ?
so many failed predictions
https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions
-
-
Two reports from 1988 ?? You've fixed your belief on such as those?
Look about yourself now.
Why don't you review the retreating glaciers, increased storm activity and retreating polar ice?
Those are not predictions..... they are happening.
At any rate, in the UK and Lowlands politicians from from both left and right, all together, support renewable energy systems, cleaner air, lower CO2 emissions, reduction in use of plastics etc. It just makes sense.
Do you want us to post the insane ramblings that the end-of-the-world crowd put out today? :chuckle:
eider
Well-known member
And there was me, thinking that you believed in great floods.
genuineoriginal
New member
With the windfarm offshore, it is hard to see all the dead birds, but the fish appreciate the extra food.
Spoiler
genuineoriginal
New member
Did he ever start?
Right Divider
Body part
Non-sequitur