I think your memory is failing. My objection to your parsing goes back way before Res appeared. What I never liked was you or anyone taking part of a sentence or response and using it to put down someone. For example, if I were to say.... You think Alabama football is great. Then you say ....
... snide remark....
...second snide remark...
Ah, good. What was the count in the last 30 days?
I didn't post a chronology, but my point was you continued to think you were making a critical assessment of value when you weren't.
Post an actual example of me doing that. I expect I have once in a while, but rarely and only when dealing with someone who wasn't remotely engaging. No, what you just called parsing was nothing like that, which is a bit of my point.
Nah. I typically respond to points. I don't alter context and I mostly skewer ideas. People? Only the ones who throw a punch. And anyone who complains about getting hit when they've done that deserves to have their head and their motive examined.
I admit you have improved lately. I enjoy it when you use your considerable mental prowess to compliment and lift people up.
You mean my pompous, baffoonish prowess?
Yes, that one.You mean my pompous, baffoonish prowess?
You lost family comment privileges when you tried to use them as a tool to injure me. So I'd appreciate it, again, if you stopped trying to interject them in any sense. I won't comment on it or ask you again.
lain:
Why? I've already given you my answer on going into the subject, its use as a side bar owing nothing to our difference over the Supreme Court and Roe and your running from a simple question faster than Jesse Owens at the Olympic games.
Beats me. I've read it's being compared to the Arizona law that didn't pass Constitutional muster, but I'm not familiar enough with it to know if that's a fair assessment. The problem with Arizona's law was a twenty week window that conflicted with the generally recognized 24 week viability concern in line with Roe. My understanding is that Texas is also a 20 week standard. So if the Texas law is covering the same ground as Arizona it's likely that it will meet the same fate under the same rationale held by the 9th Circuit, though Texas sits in the 5th Circuit and so it isn't an automatic.
I told you I wasn't going to discuss this with you and I told you why. I haven't changed my mind or position. I shouldn't have answered the tangential, but what the heck.