That is why I only posted a small snippet that was pertinent to our discussion. Ktoyou went on to say other things. I kept those private.
chrysostom’s 2013 annual awards
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Doesn't matter if it was a small snippet. It's not right.
Anna my spats with TH go way back before Res appeared in December. They date all the way back to June of 2012 when TH and I had a disagreement. And you are correct that I did not want to nor did I chime in when Res was engaging in antics with members with whom I had no particular relationship. That would be rather silly. I am not nor have I ever been a Res groupie.
I'll let Ktoyou make that call. I disclosed it way back in March and she did not object.
zoo22
Well-known member
How interesting.
Go get a life ooze.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I know the history. And yours as well, from your very first entrance to the forum in Trad's Women Dressing Provocatively thread.
"Antics?" Telling Rusha he'd enjoy seeing her burn in Hell is "antics?" Being nasty to bybee is "antics?" Maliciously stalking TH, zoo and Arthur is "antics?"
When sod came back on the scene, you found it useful to throw in your lot with him. This is the fallout.
Thank you for proving my point. I like bybee and don't recall ever being nasty to bybee. Zoo is a pest who has been trying for months to provoke me into some sort of reaction but I generally just skip over any comment he makes. It would be a waste to engage him. Arthur I regard quite highly as a friend. Rusha I stood up for. That leaves Town. I just happened to align with Res in viewing TH as an overblown pompous ego laden buffoon who likes to denigrate others. You disagree. I get that. But please don't think that I view all things Town as bad. He can often make enlightening comments. I send him pos rep when he does. He even sent me one recently.
Anna I have always liked you. But lately it seems like you want to target me for your own brand of character assassination. At least you have style.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
You prove my point. You say you regard Arthur quite highly, yet when did you stand up for him when sod was calling him "tardly," insulting him in various ways and questioning his Christianity? You like bybee. You have no problem with sod calling her names? You've made two recent digs to zoo about his agnosticism, echoing sod there as well. TH you've followed around the forum with "Don Ego," "Town Dump" and so on... TH doesn't denigrate anyone who hasn't first attacked, I know that about him. He responded to your incessant baiting, and you accused him of being an abuser and said he was calling for gang rape. "Gang rape." I still can't get over that one. That he or anyone has the magnanimity to pos rep you at this point makes them better than me, that's for sure.
I've stayed silent for too long, Eeset. What I tell you, I've thought for a long time and didn't say. It's not character assassination when it's the truth. There are consequences to your actions, and I think this is the thing that constantly surprises you.
Those you seem to want me to defend are all very capable and did not need my assistance. Your statistics stink btw. Go research how many times I simply did not respond to zoo. It will probably astound you.
I'm sure you are a much better person than I am. Life has taught me many lessons I hope you never had to learn.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
You're the one who originally brought sod into this, when you said you'd stood up for Rusha. I simply pointed out the baggage that went along with your tag-teaming with him, and what the fallout is from that. Hopefully you understand a little better why some have little interest in your attempt to paint yourself as victim.
You have no idea about my life, I have no idea about yours - we can only go by the words we speak here. It's an inconsequential legacy in the grand scheme of things, but nonetheless, our words remain.
Unless they're deleted, of course.
zoo22
Well-known member
Since your posts keep showing up in a number of my friends posts I might as well take you off ignore for a bit if only to clear some fetid air.
Likes to denigrate others? Almost never, though I will own to enjoying having a tooth or two from, say, a racist, rabid anti theist or garden variety snake. I wouldn't say denigrate though, because there's nothing unfair about it.
lain:
:think: No, not really. Overblown is a hard one to take on since it's a bit like beauty. Pompous...my writing isn't affected, though it's effective enough at riling attention whores of all stripes, actual and wanna be bullies and/or the irrational. I'd single you out in all of that, but why quibble? Ego laden...see that one has never made much sense. I have no trouble owning that I have a healthy ego. I've never been particularly good at humble, though I admire those who are. It's a failing and there's no sense in glossing over it. Laden? No. Because the trouble has never been that I take myself too seriously, but that I struggle mightily to take many people seriously at all. What's next? Ah, buffoon. I often employ absurdity, so given your emotional investment I can understand why you move that way with it.
Likes to denigrate others? Almost never, though I will own to enjoying having a tooth or two from, say, a racist, rabid anti theist or garden variety snake. I wouldn't say denigrate though, because there's nothing unfair about it.
Often? Then all the more reason for you to find me unpalatable, eh?
I can't recall the last one you sent, but they tend to coincide more with your faux olive branch moments. Mine don't. If you make me laugh or think you get one.
Look out! You're already an assassin, anna. Who knows where that might migrate.
Something to shoot for, eh?
lain:
Aww sweet pea you did the parse thingie again. Imagine that.Since your posts keep showing up in a number of my friends posts I might as well take you off ignore for a bit if only to clear some fetid air.
:think: No, not really. Overblown is a hard one to take on since it's a bit like beauty. Pompous...my writing isn't affected, though it's effective enough at riling attention whores of all stripes, actual and wanna be bullies and/or the irrational. I'd single you out in all of that, but why quibble? Ego laden...see that one has never made much sense. I have no trouble owning that I have a healthy ego. I've never been particularly good at humble, though I admire those who are. It's a failing and there's no sense in glossing over it. Laden? No. Because the trouble has never been that I take myself too seriously, but that I struggle mightily to take many people seriously at all. What's next? Ah, buffoon. I often employ absurdity, so given your emotional investment I can understand why you move that way with it.
Likes to denigrate others? Almost never, though I will own to enjoying having a tooth or two from, say, a racist, rabid anti theist or garden variety snake. I wouldn't say denigrate though, because there's nothing unfair about it.
Often? Then all the more reason for you to find me unpalatable, eh?
I can't recall the last one you sent, but they tend to coincide more with your faux olive branch moments. Mine don't. If you make me laugh or think you get one.
Look out! You're already an assassin, anna. Who knows where that might migrate.
Something to shoot for, eh?
Are you going to feature me again in your little news blog again?
So she gave you permission to post her pm before you did it?
I never posted the pm. It was quite lengthy. I posted one tiny snipet where I was informed of a pertinent fact. Kat did not object in any way to that truth being posted.
Again, she gave you permission to post any part of her pm before you did it?
Block quotes are for people who can't answer and the parsing thing was never really what you thought it was to begin with...which you mostly did because sod was there to atta-boy it, I suppose.
Meh.
