glorydaz
Well-known member
Or...calling a spade a spade instead of being politically correct.
Children Will Suffer with SSM
- Thread starter BoyStan
- Start date
Or...calling a spade a spade instead of being politically correct.
No. You can disagree. That is one thing. You can insult. Fine. But an insult is not an argument.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Neither is a threat or a lecture an argument. :chew:
kiwimacahau
Well-known member
I don't threaten. But I will not be labelled a child molester or pervert by someone like JudgeRightly who couldn't judge rightly if he tried.
glorydaz
Well-known member
You will not? You might not like what people say about you, but get used to it....especially if you support children being exploited for the sake of appeasing the ungodly beliefs of adults. It's wrong plain and simple.
kiwimacahau
Well-known member
BUlldust. It is never wrong to give information to folk at an level appropriate to their age and education.
Apolgies for my misunderstanding. I totally agree that it would be child abuse and despicable.
kiwimacahau
Well-known member
*child sex advocate
FTFY
If you teach children about sex, you are a child sex advocate and a pervert. If you support teaching children about sex, you are a child sex advocate and a pervert.
kiwimacahau
Well-known member
Teaching someone about sexuality in an age appropriate way is neither advocacy for "child sex" nor making the person who does it / supports it a "pervert."
Lon
Well-known member
Brainwashing, indoctrination, and acclimation: It is DESIGNED to go against a child's 'natural' inclinations to induce artificial acceptance and is part of the adverse sexual agenda to practice what they desire unmolested and preferably favorably with increase in participation.
It is sexual selfishness and egocentric concern. It does NOTHING for the underage child who thinks 'girls are icky' and 'boys are gross' until adolescents. American College of Pediatrics are doctors. Grow a brain, a heart, a conscience, and stop being gay, Ray.
Incorrect. It is a perversion of child development and readiness. Not having kids of your own, you wouldn't know about that. Your advocacy and gay activity is inappropriate subject matter for developmentally unready children. It is SHOVING it down their throats. Mark 9:42 You'll stand before God, Ray.
This is nothing but the same old tired right-wing hooey . There is not one shred of evidence that being raised by a same sex couple is in any way harmful to children as long as they are good parents, and most same sex couples are .
Will this "make kids gay ?" Well, the vast majority of gay people have been the children of heterosexual parents , and every day , children who will eventually grow up to be gay are born .
There ae young heterosexual people now who have been brought up by gay parents . This didn't turn the gay . This is why the claim that homosexuality is a "choice" is so idiotic .
If you are straight, nothing can make you gay. If you are gay, nothing can make you straight .
Does being raised by same sex couples put children at risk of being the victims of sexual abuse ? NO more than being raised by opposite sex couples, and of course, this kind of abuse is very common .
Much ado about nothing .
Will this "make kids gay ?" Well, the vast majority of gay people have been the children of heterosexual parents , and every day , children who will eventually grow up to be gay are born .
There ae young heterosexual people now who have been brought up by gay parents . This didn't turn the gay . This is why the claim that homosexuality is a "choice" is so idiotic .
If you are straight, nothing can make you gay. If you are gay, nothing can make you straight .
Does being raised by same sex couples put children at risk of being the victims of sexual abuse ? NO more than being raised by opposite sex couples, and of course, this kind of abuse is very common .
Much ado about nothing .
glassjester
Well-known member
How is it appropriate to teach small children about sex?
Agreed. There is a 'Safe Schools' project in Australia. It is based on Queer Theory and originated from La Trobe University in Melbourne.
So, what you hear is true. Anyone can check it out on Google.
The Safe Schools is aimed for years 7 & 8,that is early adolescents.
From my reading it is against everything that we hold normative in sexuality and gender.
So, what you hear is true. Anyone can check it out on Google.
The Safe Schools is aimed for years 7 & 8,that is early adolescents.
From my reading it is against everything that we hold normative in sexuality and gender.
Your premise that people are born gay or have a gay gene is not backed by any scientific evidence.
It is fabrication of the gay advocates to further their agendas.
Boystan, whether there is a "gay gene" or not is irrelevant, because we don;t know exactly why some people are gay . The notion that homosexuality is a "choice" is what is unscientific . Why would people "choose " to be gay in a world which is so hostile to them ? Does this make any sense ?
Lots of gay people in America have grown up in extremely conservative Christian families where they have been told that homosexuality is an "abomination ". And even if homosexuality were a choice, it's no business of others . What they do in private is their business and their business alone .
People who are hostile to gays and prejudiced against them have chose to be bigoted . Or they have been brainwashed to be bigots .
Lots of gay people in America have grown up in extremely conservative Christian families where they have been told that homosexuality is an "abomination ". And even if homosexuality were a choice, it's no business of others . What they do in private is their business and their business alone .
People who are hostile to gays and prejudiced against them have chose to be bigoted . Or they have been brainwashed to be bigots .
kiwimacahau
Well-known member
So you've missed the 1-3% of people in EVERY human generation who are born gay?