If I might deliver a few spankings too ......
If I might deliver a few spankings too ......
Did you just post of the one true trinity? I have to agree with you here! Bravo!! :cigar:
Your spiritual insight is actually spot on for once!
oly::sherlock:
Paul
Hello Pierac and all following,
While this is more or less a 'mock-thread' by GM,...he's been properly addressed from the beginning here, so any can do their own research on the facts, content and meaning of the material, - its just information,...and one can creatively engage in dialogue, or take a more ridiculing or adversarial posture, but the latter gesture does not foster any real discussion.
While the joke on the 'Trinity' is noted
......the Urantia Papers do present a most wonderful dissertation on what it calls the
'Paradise Trinity' (an even higher Trinity than the traditional-orthodox 'version')...but one would have to read the papers on this to understand the great cosmic hierarchy involved, in the greater universal context of things.
We would also note that the UB revelation of the 'Paradise Trinity' does not contain the usual problems had within a traditional-orthodox concept of the Trinity, since Jesus is only one of many thousands of
Creator-Sons who are the offspring of the Universal Father and Eternal Son (who comprise the original Trinity along with the Infinite Spirit)....so Jesus is NOT a member of that original Trinity (as orthodox Christians assume Jesus is as 'God the Son')....but is a Creator-Son born out from the Paradise Trinity. In UB theology, there is the Universal Father, Eternal Son and Infinite Spirit who make up the Paradise Trinity,.....Jesus is NOT the 'Eternal Son' in this Trinity, but an offspring born of the Universal Father and the Original Eternal Son.
21:0.1 The Creator Sons are the makers and rulers of the local universes of time and space.
In any case,...learning the material is essential if one would engage a discussion on it.
There is nothing 'fanatical' about the UB, anymore than the claims of the biblical record which requires faith to accept.
All religious books come with their own terms, meanings and values....so they are to be 'understood' within that special context, one 'learning' the 'language' so to speak.
Those not learning the language cannot understand what is being communicated. This typifies the 'condition' of some of the critics of the UB on this board. - there is a disconnect.