Bill Maher, Bill Nye, Evolution Just Don't Fly

[Arthur Brain]

Yup, typical LH "response" when he knows he has no sustainable argument...

:yawn:

 

[Lordkalvan]

Yup, typical LH "response" when he knows he has no sustainable argument...

:yawn:

Probably a few negreps, too. They seem to be a principle means of 'argument' for LH.

 

[Lighthouse]

Probably a few negreps, too. They seem to be a principle means of 'argument' for LH.

Nope. Your ignorance isn't worth the effort.

 

[Lordkalvan]

Nope. Your ignorance isn't worth the effort.

Better to just keep demonstrating your own, I guess?

 

[Lighthouse]

 

[Lordkalvan]

I see LH is determined to keep demonstrating my point.

 

[Lighthouse]

I see LH is determined to keep demonstrating my point.

You haven't made a point.

 

[Lordkalvan]

You haven't made a point.

Oh yes, I did.

 

[Lighthouse]

Oh yes, I did.

On top of your head, maybe.

 

[Arthur Brain]

On top of your head, maybe.

He pointed out an obvious shortcoming in your 'argument' which you, as per usual, were too arrogant to concede, hence the lame smiley response to the both of us. In no way did Hawking say we treat - or should treat people like animals.

 

[Lordkalvan]

On top of your head, maybe.

Ah, another demonstration of the subtle 'insult as evasion technique' as practised by certain other posters of a similar persuasion.

 

[Lighthouse]

He pointed out an obvious shortcoming in your 'argument' which you, as per usual, were too arrogant to concede, hence the lame smiley response to the both of us. In no way did Hawking say we treat - or should treat people like animals.

I never said, nor did Bob, that Hawking said we do treat each other like animals. The issue is that Hawking suggested we euthanize people as we do animals; to show mercy.

Hawking essentially said, "We do it to animals, why not people?"

I am in no way dumbfounded, flabbergasted or otherwise surprised that you, in particular, are too stupid to understand that.

Ah, another demonstration of the subtle 'insult as evasion technique' as practised by certain other posters of a similar persuasion.

Because you're nothing but a blowhard full of conceit and no humility regarding your positions, thus you are worth nothing more than being mocked. If I were Calvinist I would fully believe you to be reprobate.

And as for your stupidity; you have demonstrated as much in that you didn't get the Beam/whiskey joke.

 

[Lordkalvan]

I never said, nor did Bob, that Hawking said we do treat each other like animals. The issue is that Hawking suggested we euthanize people as we do animals; to show mercy.

We were talking about the OP. The OP said exactly this:

'...Stephen Hawking suggesting that humans treat one another like animals.'

Hawking essentially said, "We do it to animals, why not people?"

But Hawking said a great deal more than the way you have spun this, didn't he?

I am in no way dumbfounded, flabbergasted or otherwise surprised that you, in particular, are too stupid to understand that.

And you appear similarly incapable of understanding that the OP misrepesented what Hawking said.

Because you're nothing but a blowhard full of conceit and no humility regarding your positions, thus you are worth nothing more than being mocked. If I were Calvinist I would fully believe you to be reprobate.

Colour me unsurprised that you find faults in others that you appear to manifest so obviously yourself.

And as for your stupidity; you have demonstrated as much in that you didn't get the Beam/whiskey joke.

Again, insofar as you clearly failed to 'get' the jokiness in my response, you seem to be simply chastising others for perceived shortcomings that you display yourself.

Happy birthday, by the way (FYI, no sarcasm, ill-will, concealed antipathy or any other form of hostility towards you intended therein; I hope you have a nice day).

 

[Lighthouse]

We were talking about the OP. The OP said exactly this:

'...Stephen Hawking suggesting that humans treat one another like animals.'

But Hawking said a great deal more than the way you have spun this, didn't he?

And you appear similarly incapable of understanding that the OP misrepesented what Hawking said.


Colour me unsurprised that you find faults in others that you appear to manifest so obviously yourself.

Again, insofar as you clearly failed to 'get' the jokiness in my response, you seem to be simply chastising others for perceived shortcomings that you display yourself.

You're an idiot.

 

[Lordkalvan]

You're an idiot.

Thanks for the reasoned response. Do you have difficulty following and participating in a reasoned and reasonable discussion?

 

[Arthur Brain]

I never said, nor did Bob, that Hawking said we do treat each other like animals. The issue is that Hawking suggested we euthanize people as we do animals; to show mercy.

The OP said this:

"Stephen Hawking suggesting that humans treat one another like animals". That is a loaded statement right there with obvious negative implications, which surely don't need spelling out? An ignorant oversight perhaps which you've managed to compound, and somehow without realizing it.

Hawking essentially said, "We do it to animals, why not people?"

Rather he drew a comparison with how people put down animals in order to end their pain to argue that people should have the right to end their own in terminal states of suffering.

I am in no way dumbfounded, flabbergasted or otherwise surprised that you, in particular, are too stupid to understand that.

I understood it from the get go, which is why I've been arguing against the misrepresentation of Hawking - ignorant or otherwise - given in the OP along with your continual nonsense. I in turn am hardly shocked that you deflect away from your own 'clanger' in order to do your usual lame insults. Ho hum...

 

[Lighthouse]

Thanks for the reasoned response. Do you have difficulty following and participating in a reasoned and reasonable discussion?

I reasoned out that you're an idiot.

The OP said this:

"Stephen Hawking suggesting that humans treat one another like animals". That is a loaded statement right there with obvious negative implications, which surely don't need spelling out? An ignorant oversight perhaps which you've managed to compound, and somehow without realizing it.

Rather he drew a comparison with how people put down animals in order to end their pain to argue that people should have the right to end their own in terminal states of suffering.

I understood it from the get go, which is why I've been arguing against the misrepresentation of Hawking - ignorant or otherwise - given in the OP along with your continual nonsense. I in turn am hardly shocked that you deflect away from your own 'clanger' in order to do your usual lame insults. Ho hum...

You're just plain stupid.

 

[Arthur Brain]

I reasoned out that you're an idiot.


You're just plain stupid.

And you're a blowhard who isn't half as clever as he likes to think he is.

:e4e:

 

[Lordkalvan]

I reasoned out that you're an idiot.


You're just plain stupid.

You seem very curmudgeonly when your ideas are challenged and you have no reasoned response to make. Perhaps it would be better for all concerned if you just remained silent?

 

[Lighthouse]

And you're a blowhard who isn't half as clever as he likes to think he is.

:e4e:

:blabla:

You seem very curmudgeonly when your ideas are challenged and you have no reasoned response to make. Perhaps it would be better for all concerned if you just remained silent?

Curmudgeonly? No, I just recognize ignorance when I see it.