Ben Carson’s Marxist Tax Plan
- Thread starter drbrumley
- Start date
Not sure what you are asking here. Can you be more precise in the question? Thanks.
I thought your scenario had a private police department working alongside the government's police department and I was asking what criminal code would the private group use. The same laws that the government has?
Which one?
Now reread the article and get atheist/Libertarian Walter Block to agree that coercion is the role of government (per Romans 13:4)
That would be theft, except we're not talking about taking money from one person to give to another, we're talking about indispensable http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/indispensable
services that benefit an entire community (police and fire departments).
Like all Libertarians, your issue is with God.
Matthew 22: 17-21
Romans 13: 6-7
Luke 3: 12-13
Quote:
Originally Posted by drbrumley
... All three tax systems are not fair for sure. Despite the claims of fairness. There is only one fair tax. Can you name it? You pay it every week out of your paycheck.
My employer takes money from my paycheck for the federal income tax, social security and medicare. I'm curious as to which one drbrumley considers "fair"?
Originally Posted by drbrumley
... All three tax systems are not fair for sure. Despite the claims of fairness. There is only one fair tax. Can you name it? You pay it every week out of your paycheck.
My employer takes money from my paycheck for the federal income tax, social security and medicare. I'm curious as to which one drbrumley considers "fair"?
Ben Carson’s Marxist Tax Plan
Just 158 families have spent nearly half of all money fueling the presidential 2016 campaigns, according to data collected by the New York Times.
When one breaks down the wealthiest and most influential donors, 138 of the 158 highest-spending families support Republicans, and are overwhelmingly white, male and older.
It should not be surprising, therefore, that the underlying goal of any tax plan that comes from a conservative presidential candidate is to reward those 138 families.
Just 158 families have spent nearly half of all money fueling the presidential 2016 campaigns, according to data collected by the New York Times.
When one breaks down the wealthiest and most influential donors, 138 of the 158 highest-spending families support Republicans, and are overwhelmingly white, male and older.
It should not be surprising, therefore, that the underlying goal of any tax plan that comes from a conservative presidential candidate is to reward those 138 families.
Last edited:
Why no link to your leftwing propaganda jgarden?
(Obviously those families didn't live in the following zip codes) :
drbrumley
Well-known member
Ok, back to this thread.
I was asked what my plan was, so here ya go.
1. All Federal Taxes wiped out.
2. Wipe out Federal Spending. At the least 90%.
3. Use the sale of lands, have lotteries, user fees, and donations to fund government.
That's a pretty simple and workable plan to fund government.
I was asked what my plan was, so here ya go.
1. All Federal Taxes wiped out.
2. Wipe out Federal Spending. At the least 90%.
3. Use the sale of lands, have lotteries, user fees, and donations to fund government.
That's a pretty simple and workable plan to fund government.
drbrumley
Well-known member
You leftists are a hoot.
So you encourage gambling to help run government? "Donations"?
drbrumley
Well-known member
You do have reading comprehension problems don't you AcW?
Taking from one to give to another is the same thing you numbskull.
Please state your disagreement with this. Be precise. I know you can do it.
Suppose I come at you with a gun, and threaten to shoot you unless you give me half of all your money. You’re an argumentative sort, and you say, “But, wait a second, this is a felony! Don’t you realize what you’re doing? You’re committing a crime.” My reply, “Oh, sorry, I forgot. I’ll tell you what I’ll do. I’ll give you some services. Here is a paper clip.” Big deal.
No, that would be you. God told you in 1 Samuel what would happen if one pursued. Maybe you need to take heed of it, since you haven't done so yet, or is this a case of they supporting you with your paycheck so your not willing to give that up?
drbrumley
Well-known member
Lotteries are not necessarily like the ones you see states doing to support (they say) schools thereby encouraging gambling. But then you already knew that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Now reread the article and get atheist/Libertarian Walter Block to agree that coercion is the role of government (per Romans 13:4)
Did I misunderstand atheist/Libertarian Walter Block when he justified in his article a father selling his 4 year old son (who is not an adult) to a member of the North American Man Boy Love Association for food?
Back to the role of government:
Do tell those of us that have "reading comprehension problems" what the righteous role of government is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
That would be theft, except we're not talking about taking money from one person to give to another, we're talking about indispensable http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/indispensable
services that benefit an entire community (police and fire departments).
(My my, I must be getting under this Libertarian's skin). When a society taxes people to provide indispensable services, they're not taxing "one to give to another", they're taxing everyone, and everyone is benefiting from those services (police, fire, military services).
Libertarianism indoctrination 101, page 17, paragraph 3.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Like all Libertarians, your issue is with God.
Matthew 22: 17-21
Romans 13: 6-7
Luke 3: 12-13
Speaking of paychecks:
Quote:
Originally Posted by drbrumley
... All three tax systems are not fair for sure. Despite the claims of fairness. There is only one fair tax. Can you name it? You pay it every week out of your paycheck.
Are you going to tell us? (I gottsta know!).
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Now reread the article and get atheist/Libertarian Walter Block to agree that coercion is the role of government (per Romans 13:4)
Did I misunderstand atheist/Libertarian Walter Block when he justified in his article a father selling his 4 year old son (who is not an adult) to a member of the North American Man Boy Love Association for food?
Back to the role of government:
Do tell those of us that have "reading comprehension problems" what the righteous role of government is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
That would be theft, except we're not talking about taking money from one person to give to another, we're talking about indispensable http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/indispensable
services that benefit an entire community (police and fire departments).
(My my, I must be getting under this Libertarian's skin). When a society taxes people to provide indispensable services, they're not taxing "one to give to another", they're taxing everyone, and everyone is benefiting from those services (police, fire, military services).
Libertarianism indoctrination 101, page 17, paragraph 3.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Like all Libertarians, your issue is with God.
Matthew 22: 17-21
Romans 13: 6-7
Luke 3: 12-13
Speaking of paychecks:
Quote:
Originally Posted by drbrumley
... All three tax systems are not fair for sure. Despite the claims of fairness. There is only one fair tax. Can you name it? You pay it every week out of your paycheck.
Are you going to tell us? (I gottsta know!).
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So you encourage gambling to help run government? "Donations"?
Lotteries? Donations? Tell us more!
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So you encourage gambling to help run government? "Donations"?
Lotteries? Donations? Tell us more!
drbrumley
Well-known member
No need...you got it.
Yikes ! Anyone who could accuse Ben Carson of having "Marxist " ideas does not even know what Marxism is . But I have yet to meet a conservative who knows what socialism, Marxism and communism
are . They just bandy these vaguely scary words around indiscriminately as fear mongering . These terms have become utterly meaningless .
are . They just bandy these vaguely scary words around indiscriminately as fear mongering . These terms have become utterly meaningless .
wacko
so is drbrumley