Banned YouTube videos

chair

Well-known member
TOL has done it pretty regularly, so why not youtube?

On a basic moral level, the two are equivalent (well, maybe not, since one side represents God and Truth, while the other side are lying nasty atheist commie-Nazi's). Social media does have a much larger impact, though. Face it- if TOL disappeared, hardly anyone would notice. That is not the case for youtube.

Kind of a weird situation. In the name of Freedom, Youtube should be allowed to do whatever they want. Including censorship. Do you want to get government involved and FORCE them to not pick and choose what they allow?
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
People have had posts removed on here for overtly racist/sexist content before and similar. Should they have been left to stand?

I'm talking about political censorship.

So I'll repeat my question: Does the banning of the video in post #2 make you happy?
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
I'm talking about political censorship.

So I'll repeat my question: Does the banning of the video in post #2 make you happy?

I was banned from Facebook for a month over the winter for making the horribly insensitive racist comment "white people are evil" :chuckle:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I'm talking about political censorship.

So I'll repeat my question: Does the banning of the video in post #2 make you happy?

Overt racism wasn't tolerated on here so what kind of censorship does that fall under when people have broken the rules? Otherwise, not having seen the video I don't know but if it was advocating hate speech and the like then YT are well within their rights to remove it. It's not like there's not plenty of right wing stuff and Trump support videos on the site.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass

That Q conspiracy channel has tons of videos still up. This particular video is available at several sites, as you know since you posted from one of them:

My videos are now available on:
Vimeo:
imeo[/URL]. com/citizensireport...
Bitchute:
bitchute.%20com/channel/cit...igativereport/"]https://www.bitchute. com/channel/cit...igativereport/
And Self Hosted on my website:
"https://www.c%E2%80%A6"]https://www. c…



You never answered my question, because I think you know the answer. Youtube has the right to moderate content in the same way that TOL does.



BTW, I watched 5 minutes into one of them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT2dO3hM0RU

where she claims her Q guy John Solomon is "the only person" to have the disclaimer that "the views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill.

("It's just crazy!" she says)

But that's the standard disclaimer for an editorial on the opinion page, and ALL contributors have the same disclaimer, meant to help the reader differentiate between news and commentary.

Here's the top of The Hill's opinion page:



Screen-Shot-2020-09-12-at-6-04-52-AM.png




See the disclaimer there, under Opinion?

Click on a random contributor and you'll see the same exact disclaimer on every one of them:

Screen-Shot-2020-09-12-at-6-08-55-AM.png



Her claim is FAKE NEWS!
 

quip

BANNED
Banned
The left-wing Nazi-like censors at YouTube occasionally ban conservative videos. Conservative videos are posted every single day. But every now and then there is one that the leftists simply cannot tolerate going viral. So, having learned well from their teachers from Nazi Germany, they censor their political opponents.
Adding to Anna's point: YouTube can't be accused of censorship...they don't wield such power or authority. Only the government can do so.

I'll post them here whenever I can find them on other video hosting sites.

Correct....and to my point.
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
That Q conspiracy channel has tons of videos still up.

I didn't say YouTube banned her entire channel. I said they banned this one video. Why do you think they did that? What do you think was so threatening to the left-wing agenda that this one video could not be tolerated?
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
I didn't say YouTube banned her entire channel. I said they banned this one video. Why do you think they did that? What do you think was so threatening to the left-wing agenda that this one video could not be tolerated?

I didn't say you did. Probably because someone flagged the video content as being false or misleading.

But you still got to watch it, right? From any of several places, right?

Youtube can moderate their content, plain and simple and it seems you don't like that they have that power as a private company. You want government to fix it?

And you glossed right over her fakery, too. If she can't even get the disclaimer out there honestly, how can you trust the rest of her content?
 

jgarden

BANNED
Banned
upon
Does Youtube have the same right to moderate content that TOL does?


Even "Youtube" makes its Code of Conduct available to its users - TOL keeps it a secret, if it exists at all, and chooses to close those threads when members openly question as to why it refuses to extended to them the courtesy of providing them access to the rules!

The left-wing Nazi-like censors at YouTube occasionally ban conservative videos. Conservative videos are posted every single day. But every now and then there is one that the leftists simply cannot tolerate going viral. So, having learned well from their teachers from Nazi Germany, they censor their political opponents.

I'll post them here whenever I can find them on other video hosting sites.

"Jefferson" accuses *You-Tube" of resorting to Nazi tactics when it censors conservative videos - at least Nazi Germany didn't keep the content of its own Nuremberg Laws a secret!

Footnote: If the Nazis were left-wing why did they support Franco and the conservatives in overthrowing the socialist government in Spain - why did Hitler consider communist Russia to be Germany's greatest threat and arch-enemy?
 
Last edited:

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
At least "Youtube" makes its Code of Conduct available to its users - TOL keeps its a secret, if it exists at all, and chooses to close those threads when members openly question as to why it refuses extended to them the courtesy of providing them access to the rules!

Whine, whine, whine

At least Nazi Germany allowed the public to see the Nuremberg Laws!


:darwinsm:
 
Top