wickwoman
New member
Zakath said:Wasn't Jesus accused of associating with the religiously unacceptable?
Why yes, I believe he was. See my post #95.
Zakath said:Wasn't Jesus accused of associating with the religiously unacceptable?
Weren't infidels (which includes atheists) religious undesirables, so far as Jesus' peers were concerned?Dread Helm said:She didn't ask that. She asked specifically about atheists.
Was he rejected by the "religiously unacceptable" specifically those that He hung around or those that followed him?Zakath said:Wasn't Jesus accused of associating with the religiously unacceptable?
I seem to recall that quite a number of folks from a variety of viewpoints had trouble with Jesus and his teachings; folks from both groups you mention... :think:the Sibbie said:Was he rejected by the "religiously unacceptable" specifically those that He hung around or those that followed him?
That doesn't mean they came to His rescue.Zakath said:I seem to recall that quite a number of folks from a variety of viewpoints had trouble with Jesus and his teachings; folks from both groups you mention... :think:
I think the gospel hints that the diverse crowds that followed him kept him from harm on more than one occasion.the Sibbie said:That doesn't mean they came to His rescue.
SOTK said:Yeah, I'm not necessarily losing any sleep over it, however, it can be a tough situation for me to come to terms with as a Christian.
First of all, you said I am only nice to those who pay attention to me. Well, I don’t exactly see myself going out of the way to be mean to someone who is not paying attention to me. If I recall correctly, I never intentionally thrashed anyone on this board for any reason except friendly theological debate, and even then did so in a professional manner. People who don’t pay attention to me, I just don’t pay attention to them. If I wronged anyone, I apologize for it. Someone let me know what I did, and I’ll repent and correct my action.There's a difference between being nice and kissing the butt of anyone who will pay attention to you. I think "The Edge" is "nice" to everyone, as long as it suits his ego.
Erin Marie, this is disturbing to me for several reasons:I thought for a long time how I should respond to The Edge and his "threats". Turbo and I talked about it a bit last night, and I reread this thread:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16851
It reaffirmed to me that you are wrong and I am right. I can judge all I want, as long as I judge rightly under God's Word. The stuff you spew is inaccurate and misleading. Jesus mocked, taunted and used wit and sarcasm. He was a great orater and not a butt kissing fool.
You can think you're exemplifying Jesus all you want, but you are wrong. Please reconsider your idea of the "Nicer than God" philosophy.
Secondly, I find fault with issues in your life that you yourself throw all around the board for others to comment on. If you don't want someone to create an opinion, then don't post it.
You complain that your son is "More like a two or a three year old than a five year old." OUCH! You talk about the burden of raising two young children and you are not even in the same state with them!
You complain about the gifts that God has given you, I called you out on it, you agreed with me and then continued on complaining.
You complain about the price of baby items, and how much money it costs to raise a child, and instead of supporting reprimanding your wife for her wasteful spending, and curbing it yourself, you suggest the manufacturer lower it's prices! HELLO!
You try to ingratiate yourself in with each "group" on TOL, with your "gentlemanly" manner...but it's all very disingenuous.
You should have ignored it. Looks like you started a fire you can’t put out. And now the forest is aflame, and you are in the middle of the inferno.I considered ignoring your rebuke of my earlier comment, and I decided I can comment any way I want on any issue. I'm not afraid of any reprecussion that you think you can hurdle my way. Wanna give me ANOTHER negative response, go ahead.
I'm tired of your pandering and plodding around TOL without any sense of Christ's true Word or Intentions.
Well said. I got drawn into it because I rubbed someone the wrong way and they wanted to lash out. They don’t like me, they saw me making friends and it irked them.GODRULZ said in post 88
Did the Edge talk about his personal situation publicly? Where? If this is not a public issue needing public rebuke, it should be dealt with privately between the two. Digging into personal matters could be petty and gossip, rather than wanting the good of another.
I thought this was about Zak's credibility. How did Edge man get drawn into the firing line?
No. But if atheists are able to recognize the crudeness of Erin Marie’s behavior, then they see something about her character that is not consistent with Christ.SIBBIE in post 94
Wait...are you saying Jesus had atheists running to his rescue?
The Edge on “Judging.”
Face One: “I don't like to be falsely accused and judged, and I did not want to fall into the same trap.”
Face Two: “I will admit I don’t know a ton about Bob Enyart, but I did a little research on him before posting this, and he does not have a completely favorable opinion from the Christian community…. He was unremorseful, even though he did it against the wishes of the boy’s mother….He also believes OT law is still valid just as it was in the OT”
Face One <revisted>: “John 7:24 says “Do not judge according to appearance, but judge with righteous judgement.” You can’t do that on a board when you don’t know people.”
Face Two <revisted>: “You should have ignored it. Looks like you started a fire you can’t put out. And now the forest is aflame, and you are in the middle of the inferno. This is not just another negative response. I’m calling you on YOUR mistake…”
The Edge on “Attcking People
Face One: “Jesus was harsh and rude to people when they refused to believe Him and were hypocritical and stood directly against him. I did not stand directly against you. Erin, I’m a fellow brother in Christ! We’re not supposed to act like this!”
Face Two: “I will admit I don’t know a ton about Bob Enyart, but I did a little research on him before posting this, and he does not have a completely favorable opinion from the Christian community”
Face One <revisted>: “… and badmouth me behind my back. That’s so middle school, Erin”
Face One <revisted>: “I am not a mean person. And I would never come on here and just attack someone out of the blue, whether I feel they wronged me or not”
The Edge on “Fair Game”
Face One: “That is certainly someone I would not want to follow. Well if I was an unbeliever, I would never want to be a Christian if that is how I saw them act.”
Face Two: “And before anyone attacks me on my thoughts on what I have seen of Bob Enyart thusfar, please refrain. My purpose in this post is to answer to Erin’s accusations, not to debate about Bob Enyart. I saw enough about him to enable me to posts here. I do not wish to discuss him further.”
Face Three: “And I am proud to be a gentleman. There’s too few of us, and chivalry is dying because of that.”
I never said this. I fully expect to answer for my post. I have the right to answer when false charges are brought against me. I don't gravitate towards extremes. I rebuke those that need rebuke, I am not nice literally all the time to everyone. But what point is it to be harsh to someone just because we feel like it? Do I need to be harsh wih atheists just because of their theological stance? I don't think so. They did nothing bad to me. If they directly disrrespect me, then I would get less nice. I am not "extremely nice." People who know me in person will attest to that.You mean you want to slam the friend of many people here and then not have to answer for your own post. You’d like the cheap shots to go un-countered if at all possible. And you'd like us to think of you as chivalrous in the meantime.
Aren't turbo and em related somehow?The fact that you felt the need to discuss me at length with Turbo the moderator behind my back.
Thanks for pointing that out Mr....Mr. 5020 said:Aren't turbo and em related somehow?
Context, laddie, context... Atheists are considered religiously unacceptable people by the Jews.Dread Helm said:She didn't ask that. She asked specifically about atheists.