The Edge said:Yeah we obviously should not support a government with an evil tyrant in place....I think in that case it would be Biblical to throw off such a government.
Since adultery is not presently a capital crime in this country, if it were made to be a capital crime tomorrow it would still be wrong to execute everyone who has every committed adultery. But it would be right to swiftly execute everyone who commits adultery from that day forth. One of the effects would be a drastic drop it the rate of adultery even among those who have cheated or are cheating.The Edge said:if we immediatly put to death today anyone who killed, cheated, or was gay, we'd probably reduce the world's population by at least a half.....it woudl be frightening and drastic.
The Edge said:within reason. hitler needed to be stopped.
I can agree with this.Turbo said:Since adultery is not presently a capital crime in this country, if it were made to be a capital crime tomorrow it would still be wrong to execute everyone who has every committed adultery. But it would be right to swiftly execute everyone who commits adultery from that day forth. One of the effects would be a drastic drop it the rate of adultery even among those who have cheated or are cheating.
But if the government were to suddenly take a more firm stance on the death penalty, it would not be wrong for the government to immediately execute all criminals who are already on death row.
Make sense?
I just did....read my previous posts.BillyBob said:So you agree that submission to your government is not a requirement?
That's right where I was headed.Turbo said:Since adultery is not presently a capital crime in this country, if it were made to be a capital crime tomorrow it would still be wrong to execute everyone who has every committed adultery. But it would be right to swiftly execute everyone who commits adultery from that day forth. One of the effects would be a drastic drop it the rate of adultery even among those who have cheated or are cheating.
But if the government were to suddenly take a more firm stance on the death penalty, it would not be wrong for the government to immediately execute all criminals who are already on death row.
Make sense?
Work to change the things that you can change.Speak out against the evil that you can't change and suport the government in what they are doing right. It, for example, was ok to suport Hitlers building of highways.The Edge said:Berean Todd,
Ok, but I think Billybob had a point. What if Hitler won World War II, and gained control of America. What should we do? What is the Biblical thing to do?
Also, apparently bob e promotes death for adultery, but Jesus goes on to say "whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery." So under his proposed government wouldn't he be subject to the death penalty?
servent101 said:beefalobilly
The church would then also kill all homosexuals and lesbians - pronounce that most of the marriages are null in void because they were not preformed in church with the blessing of God, so then all non-believers would be killed who were married, no-one would be allowed to be married unless they had a "church wedding" – hypothetically of course.
For this reason, most sane human beings should stop the church from persecuting homosexuals and lesbians who are good people who don't want to kill anyone, and speak out against the "apostate" doctrines in the church. If the church succeeds in persecuting people of a different sexual orientation than they deem as “normal” they will just fuel their hatred of anything and everything – which is why most people go to church anyways – to find something or someone to hate / or at least they should think about that for a moment or two.
With Christ's Love
Servent101
There are so many untruths in this postservent101 said:beefalobilly
The church would then also kill all homosexuals and lesbians - pronounce that most of the marriages are null in void because they were not preformed in church with the blessing of God, so then all non-believers would be killed who were married, no-one would be allowed to be married unless they had a "church wedding" – hypothetically of course.
For this reason, most sane human beings should stop the church from persecuting homosexuals and lesbians who are good people who don't want to kill anyone, and speak out against the "apostate" doctrines in the church. If the church succeeds in persecuting people of a different sexual orientation than they deem as “normal” they will just fuel their hatred of anything and everything – which is why most people go to church anyways – to find something or someone to hate / or at least they should think about that for a moment or two.
With Christ's Love
Servent101
Nope he gets a pass since, in his fantasy scenario, the goon squads wouldn't be allowed to go after anyone who sinned prior to the change in government...beefalobilly said:Also, apparently bob e promotes death for adultery, but jesus goes on to say "whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery." So under his proposed government wouldn't he be subject to the death penalty?
servent101 said:beefalobilly
The church would then also kill all homosexuals and lesbians - pronounce that most of the marriages are null in void because they were not preformed in church with the blessing of God, so then all non-believers would be killed who were married, no-one would be allowed to be married unless they had a "church wedding" – hypothetically of course.
For this reason, most sane human beings should stop the church from persecuting homosexuals and lesbians who are good people who don't want to kill anyone, and speak out against the "apostate" doctrines in the church. If the church succeeds in persecuting people of a different sexual orientation than they deem as “normal” they will just fuel their hatred of anything and everything – which is why most people go to church anyways – to find something or someone to hate / or at least they should think about that for a moment or two.
With Christ's Love
Servent101
beefalobilly said:My question is, that if you feel the government should execute all adulterers, then what do you make of this verse
"You have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not commit adultery.' "But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart."
I mean honestly, can any guy in this forum say they've never lusted after a woman they're not married to? Correct me if I'm wrong here, but wouldn't lusting after another woman, even before you've ever been married, still be considered adultery?
Also, apparently bob e promotes death for adultery, but jesus goes on to say "whoever marries a woman who is divorced commits adultery." So under his proposed government wouldn't he be subject to the death penalty?