Ah, so you think it is OK for people who have been raped or molested to have to bring that foetus to term? Shame on you.
You believe that value of an unborn baby is determined by how the parent views him/her.
Shame on you.
Ah, so you think it is OK for people who have been raped or molested to have to bring that foetus to term? Shame on you.
No. I think the mental health of the mother is far more important than a foetus.
A foetus is a potential human being.
I fully support pregnancies where they are wanted.
Further, I think it is the right of the woman to decide whether to carry to term.
What I do NOT support is others making that decision for her.
please provide evidence
Is Ted Cruz the other 1/20th?
__
Indeed ... it doesn't make much sense for someone who is soooo opposed to having children to invite one into their body then, does it? Oh, and before you start droning on with the "butttt what about rape victims", everyone knows that is nothing more than a diversionary tactic.
Easy to remedy. Don't get pregnant. You do understand how babies are made, correct? Seriously, there is no such thing as a Pregnancy Leprechaun.
The decision to allow herself to become pregnant? Are you one of those people who needs to be convinced that 1 + 2 = 3?
My first child was unplanned. My wife got pregnant even though we took steps to prevent it. Of course, when we found out she was pregnant we got excited and went through with it and never had a thought otherwise. But they are not so easily preventable all the time.
Unless you are suggesting that married couples that do not desire kids should not have sex at all. . .
Not everyone who is pregnant deliberately decided to be so. Need I remind you of that?
Not everyone who drives drunk desires to take out a family of four with their recklessness ...
1: A foetus is not a baby.
2: Most abortions take place long before a foetus is anything other than a simple clump of cells.
Just like a baby is not a child. These are stages of human development. A foetus is a human
Which humans should not be offered a right to life as the most fundamental of all human rights?
Do you oppose all others or is this argument a red herring?
Abortion is better? What about punishing the human who is at fault rather than punishing the human that is not yet capable of guilt?
Let's test that. A woman is 8 months pregnant and decides she wants her foetus killed. Should this be a legal choice?
You ducked that earlier
1 word: adoptionLate-term abortions are most often medically mandated rather than choice driven but THINK for a moment, would you want someone who would abort an 8 month old foetus actually raising that child?
The needless killing of said human is not a punishment? That's a semantic rationalization and nothing more. The result is the same.The foetus is not being punished
:liberals:indeed before the brain links to the body at around 24 weeks, the foetus cannot feel anything.
But please answer me this, why do you think the woman carrying a foetus conceived in an act of rape or molestation should be punished by having to carry to term?
Simple common sense tells you that, as far as God is concerned, there is no 'right to life.
Non sequiturFully 50% of fertilised zygotes do not even implant in the placental wall, of those that do a further percentage spontaneously abort (ie miscarry.)
A foetus is a potential human being.