Anyone Who Thinks Another Person Deserves To Be Raped Is A Knob

[ClimateSanity]

This video was produced to titillate both men and women. The people responsible for this are defrauding their customers. They are giving them something to desire that they cannot have. This is what the stripper does nightly but her act could seem more possible to become reality in the minds of perverted losers. This is what makes it dangerous for her.

 

[elohiym]

they didn't have a category for "essentially divorced"

Legal separation is essentially divorce. You know this. The reason it would be illegal if you were divorced is the reason I believe it would immoral if you were essentially divorced. Again, in principle.

rather, they would reconfigure her policy to exclude me - it was a family policy with the two of us and our sons on it

And when your sons grow up they should be excluded, right? There is a principle at work.

their "character" in what way?

It would depend on the circumstances, of course.

they were a non-profit hospital following guidelines set up in the employee contract and the insurance contract - they weren't free-lancing this

Ah, then you shouldn't have said they allowed it but rather they were obligated to let you take advantage of the system with a perverted bill of divorce.

Makes sense now.

 

[ok doser]

Legal separation is essentially divorce.

not on their forms

and insurance is all about forms

And when your sons grow up they should be excluded, right? There is a principle at work.

when they reach the appropriate age (25, i believe) or find other coverage

as specified in the contract

Ah, then you shouldn't have said they allowed it

well, yes, i should have said that because that was what i meant to say

but rather they were obligated

they were obligated to hold to the terms of the contract

as was i

to let you take advantage of the system

again, they weren't taking advantage of me, i wasn't taking advantage of them

we were both adhering to the terms of a signed contract

 

[ok doser]

This video was produced to titillate both men and women. The people responsible for this are defrauding their customers. They are giving them something to desire that they cannot have. This is what the stripper does nightly but her act could seem more possible to become reality in the minds of perverted losers. This is what makes it dangerous for her.

ow

that hurts


i've been streaming brahms

 

[elohiym]

not on their forms

and insurance is all about forms

I'm discussing substance not form.

when they reach the appropriate age (25, i believe) or find other coverage

And when you are divorced it is appropriate for you to find your own coverage.

well, yes, i should have said that because that was what i meant to say

Okay.

again, they weren't taking advantage of me, i wasn't taking advantage of them

we were both adhering to the terms of a signed contract

Rather, you and your wife were taking advantage of them using the perverted bill of divorce to avoid admitting that you are both divorced in your hearts, before God, as you claim.

If you claim you are divorced (in your heart) it follows you are just using a perversion of a bill of divorce that masks the divorce for financial gain.

 

[ok doser]

I'm discussing substance not form.

and you're making it up as you go

the bottom line is this - we had a contract - the hospital, the insurance company, my wife, my kids, me - with certain terms and conditions

and all of those conditions were met to the satisfaction of everyone involved - the hospital, the insurance company, my wife, my kids, me


now you come along and tell me that you aren't satisfied?

well, pardon me if that doesn't strike me as being just a wee bit retarded

stop being retarded elo

 

[1PeaceMaker]

This video was produced to titillate both men and women. The people responsible for this are defrauding their customers. They are giving them something to desire that they cannot have.

Only a fool would actually desire the flesh on the screen. And likewise, you could argue the same about every inanimate object that appears desirable because it could be coveted.

But coveting is not the same as appreciation.

This is what the stripper does nightly

And belly dancers, and dance troops...

but her act could seem more possible to become reality in the minds of perverted losers. This is what makes it dangerous for her.

The dance is meant to entertain and titillate not stir covetousness and obsession.

Why did God encourage music and dancing? Any woman dancing can titillate a man if she is beautiful, as long as you can see her body move.

 

[ok doser]

Why did God encourage music and dancing?

because He wanted women to act like whores and harlots and strippers? :freak:

 

[ClimateSanity]

Only a fool would actually desire the flesh on the screen. And likewise, you could argue the same about every inanimate object that appears desirable because it could be coveted.

But coveting is not the same as appreciation.



And belly dancers, and dance troops...



The dance is meant to entertain and titillate not stir covetousness and obsession.

Why did God encourage music and dancing? Any woman dancing can titillate a man if she is beautiful, as long as you can see her body move.

In this video, the dances are intended to titillate. Yes they do arouse the flesh of thousands of men and women. If they didn't, the producers would have gone another route. Sex sells in America. ....yes images too. Why were thousands of porn magazines sold and then later videos and then millions of hits on the web. That screen is doing something to these people obviously.

 

[ClimateSanity]

because He wanted women to act like whores and harlots and strippers? :freak:

The music and dancing God intended is not to act like a whores and entice men with something they cannot have.

 

[1PeaceMaker]

The music and dancing God intended is not to act like a whores and entice men with something they cannot have.

Show us a video of what this kind of dancing you think God intended would look like in your opinion.

 

[1PeaceMaker]

In this video, the dances are intended to titillate. Yes they do arouse the flesh of thousands of men and women. If they didn't, the producers would have gone another route. Sex sells in America. ....yes images too. Why were thousands of porn magazines sold and then later videos and then millions of hits on the web. That screen is doing something to these people obviously.

When I see a belly dancer or the like I don't see a whore or an adulteress inciting men to rape or covet. Why do you?

 

[genuineoriginal]

We are basically discussing the morality of obtaining the benefit after the marriage is essentially dissolved (legal separation), where he claims there is no chance of reconciliation.

He did not get married in order to gain a benefit.
He stayed married to retain a benefit he already had.

Notice the part I highlighted.
It makes your entire argument of less weight than a helium filled balloon.

 

[ok doser]

He did not get married in order to gain a benefit.
He stayed married to retain a benefit he already had.

Notice the part I highlighted.
It makes your entire argument of less weight than a helium filled balloon.

elo's had a problem with me that goes back a long long way

if you have time, this thread was an awful lot of fun: http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=103946

 

[genuineoriginal]

Object to an able man paying for his own health insurance? How heartless.

No, you are heartless for wanting a married couple to split their financial obligations according to what you think benefits the woman.

Hasn't he claimed they are beyond reconciliation and that he wants to start dating?

As long as they are merely legally separated, there is a chance for them to reconcile.

Look at you, hanging on now to legal technicalities while ignoring the principles in play.

Yes, I do rely on God's law in matters that pertain to the law.
Why don't you?

Because, as ok doser stated, it's illegal. :duh:

He then said this:

they were a non-profit hospital following guidelines set up in the employee contract and the insurance contract - they weren't free-lancing this

If you understood insurance and contract law, the only way it would be illegal for his ex-wife to keep him on the insurance policy is if it violated the terms of the contract, which would make it a case of insurance fraud.
If the contract permitted it, there is nothing wrong with his ex-wife keeping him on the insurance policy.
I have even heard of divorce cases where one spouse is ordered to pay for health insurance for the other spouse as part of the settlement.

 

[ok doser]

here's Lighthouse's opinion of him in 2004 :darwinsm:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=636106&postcount=4


here's some guy named koban from back in 2005 :darwinsm:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=890812&postcount=3

 

[genuineoriginal]

here's Lighthouse's opinion of him :darwinsm:

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=636106&postcount=4


here's some guy named koban from back in 2005 :darwinsm:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=890812&postcount=3

Proverbs 11:13 13 A talebearer revealeth secrets: but he that is of a faithful spirit concealeth the matter.​

 

[glorydaz]

Oh, you didn't realize that you confessed to marriage fraud in order to obtain health care benefits? Well, you did. Oops, I guess.

Hmmm..... What was that you confessed to Meshak? I remember you had yourself quite a little tanny for disclosing it. You may have even claimed you didn't mean it the way she'd taken it. Something to do with being unfaithful....or underage girls.... :think:

 

[ClimateSanity]

When I see a belly dancer or the like I don't see a whore or an adulteress inciting men to rape or covet. Why do you?

You cannot see that both the man and the woman in this video are dancing in a purposeful way to sexually arouse the opposite sex? Why is David coverdale wearing skin tight pants and trying to attract attention to his crotch if not to visually arouse females?

 

[1PeaceMaker]

Hmmm..... What was that you confessed to Meshak? I remember you had yourself quite a little tanny for disclosing it. You may have even claimed you didn't mean it the way she'd taken it. Something to do with being unfaithful....or underage girls.... :think:

She criticized my husband for remarrying after being divorced, and claimed he was presently committing adultery with me.

Care to sow any other lies?