ECT Another verse that proves MAD is a lie.Rom.16:7 Leave the cult and follow Jesus.

[Danoh]

I'm not even a Honda Hybrid, and I can find 1 Cor 15:1-4 in the Law and Prophets.

Nope - Paul's is his often uniquely Dispensational application of a Principle.

There, his is his often DISTINCT use...of a SAME principle...DIFFERENT in APPLICATION in, and given...this DISTINCT...MYSTERY age...we are in, Rom. 16:25.

(for those of you too often stuck in a "one size fits all" my use of caps here are merely for emphasis :chuckle

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Nope - Paul's is his often uniquely Dispensational application of a Principle.

There, his is his often DISTINCT use...of a SAME principle...DIFFERENT in APPLICATION in, and given...this DISTINCT...MYSTERY age...we are in, Rom. 16:25.

(for those of you too often stuck in a "one size fits all" my use of caps here are merely for emphasis :chuckle

huh?

 

[Right Divider]

When did you become such a :troll: ?

I'm not sure since I've not been around as long as many here, but let me take a guess: day one?

 

[Danoh]

huh?

Basic Acts 9 Study Principle.

Have often discussed it with Acts 9 Dispensational Pastor-Teachers also aware of it.

And have mentioned it on here in the past.

A failure to note those much finer kinds of things that differ or distinctions between things, as study principles, is why someone like an IP ended up leaving Dispensationalism.

Absent of having noted such finer distinctions, one either ends up (1) either seeing a hole where there is not one, and or (2) being unable to solve for said seeming holes, and or (3) staying put in error, and or (4) departing from Dispensationalism, (5) and or from Acts 9; (6) into some other supposed means of a solution.

That is why those who hold to the Acts 2 and or the Acts 28 Position do.

And why you and I have ended up at understandings on some things that greatly differ from Basic Acts 9 Based findings on said understandings...

Study principles such as that one...

"Give a man a fish; feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish; feed him.for a lifetime" - an old Chinese Proverb.

"This witness is true..." - The Apostle Paul - Titus 1:12-13.

 

[Danoh]

I'm not sure since I've not been around as long as many here, but let me take a guess: day one?

Nope.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Basic Acts 9 Study Principle.

Have often discussed it with Acts 9 Dispensational Pastor-Teachers also aware of it.

And have mentioned it on here in the past.

A failure to note those much finer kinds of things that differ or distinctions between things, as study principles, is why someone like an IP ended up leaving Dispensationalism.

Absent of having noted such finer distinctions, one either ends up (1) either seeing a hole where there is not one, and or (2) being unable to solve for said seeming holes, and or (3) staying put in error, and or (4) departing from Dispensationalism, (5) and or from Acts 9; (6) into some other supposed means of a solution.

That is why those who hold to the Acts 2 and or the Acts 28 Position do.

And why you and I have ended up at understandings on some things that greatly differ from Basic Acts 9 Based findings on said understandings...

Study principles such as that one...

"Give a man a fish; feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish; feed him.for a lifetime" - an old Chinese Proverb.

"This witness is true..." - The Apostle Paul - Titus 1:12-13.

Acts is a transition, including Paul's ministry.

 

[Right Divider]

Nope.

Now you're trolling. Good job.

 

[Danoh]

Now you're trolling. Good job.

lol - I knew you'd take that wrong.

But I was thinking of JohnW's oft reminder to Tel, of how receiving of info he first started out on TOL..

Things that differ, bro.

 

[Right Divider]

lol - I knew you'd take that wrong.

You think that you're cute, but you're just obtuse.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

You think that you're cute, but you're just obtuse.

Danoh The Acute?

 

[Right Divider]

Danoh The Acute?

Danoh The Oblique.

 

[Danoh]

Danoh The Acute?

Or as one female put it "Danoh cute..." :chuckle:

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Or as one female put it "Danoh cute..." :chuckle:

Was she african american?

 

[john w]

Or as one female put it "Danoh cute..." :chuckle:

Why do the Hawaiian actors on the old "Hawaii Five-0" find it necessary to change their names? For eg., Kam Fong as "Chin Ho?" Really needed? Curious...

 

[Danoh]

Was she african american?

Yep.

But who cares - acute is a cute, lol

 

[Danoh]

Why do the Hawaiian actors on the old "Hawaii Five-0" find it necessary to change their names? For eg., Kam Fong as "Chin Ho?" Really needed? Curious...

Sort of like those tv shows where the show is named after the lead actor, but his name is different in the show itself

 

[john w]

Was she african american?

I'm a caucasian American, and thinking of changing my name to LaJohn. "Ya know"-like Pele, LaBron, Prince, Madonna... One name makes me important. Weigh in, TOL audience...

View attachment 25760

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Why do the Hawaiian actors on the old "Hawaii Five-0" find it necessary to change their names? For eg., Kam Fong as "Chin Ho?" Really needed? Curious...

Oh sure! And why did Andy Griffith change his name to Andy Taylor? REALLY NEEDED???

LIES AND DECEPTION IN MAYBERRY!!!!!

 

[john w]

Sort of like those tv shows where the show is named after the lead actor, but his name is different in the show itself

Like "The Donald Duck Show," or "The Dick Van Dyke Show?" Or "Bob?"(as in Newhart)

 

[Danoh]

Oh sure! And why did Andy Griffith change his name to Andy Taylor? REALLY NEEDED???

LIES AND DECEPTION IN MAYBERRY!!!!!

Andy was very well known by then - on all the talk shows and such.

Naming the show after him was because of that.

No one would have known who Andy Taylor was.

You might recall the show was actually first introduced on another, already very well known show (was it the Danny Thomas show?)