ECT All the Prophets, Acts 3

[Tambora]

How quickly you forget heir spit on that book, that one time I mentioned I was re-reading it.

So no, yours / even more so heirs / STP's would be "the hybrid version."

Acts 17: 11, 12.

Your ever automatic compulsion, right away, to turn a thing into an opportunity for more of your ignorance due to your fool personal animosity.

I remember Heir not beating around the bush with generalities and expecting everyone to read her mind, but laid out her objection specifically.
Something you repeatedly lack the confidence and competence to do.

Twist the words of my post to you how you need to.
I am merely pointing out the obvious

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

Two kinds does a hybrid make.

Your take is a mistake.

In short - fake, fake, fake.

Yeah, I know - go jump in the lake.

Oy vay, and for goodness sake.

:chuckle:

Rom. 5: 6-8.

Blessed and cursed, both in Genesis 12.
Two types.
You know it, but do not like it.

 

[Danoh]

Blessed and cursed, both in Genesis 12.
Two types.
You know it, but do not like it.

More of your reading into a thing.

In this case, twice. :chuckle:

Rom. 5: 6-8.

 

[Danoh]

Your ever automatic compulsion, right away, to turn a thing into an opportunity for more of your ignorance due to your fool personal animosity.

I remember Heir not beating around the bush with generalities and expecting everyone to read her mind, but laid out her objection specifically.
Something you repeatedly lack the confidence and competence to do.

Twist the words of my post to you how you need to.
I am merely pointing out the obvious

Nah, just you - having once more run right into the foul stench that is your double-standard.

Thank God for Rom. 5: 6-8.

 

[Tambora]

Nah, just you - having once more run right into the foul stench that is your double-standard.

Thank God for Rom. 5: 6-8.

Regardless of your obvious duplicity and stupidity towards me, I pray you recover.

 

[Danoh]

Regardless of your obvious duplicity and stupidity towards me, I pray you recover.

Yeah...Okay...sure you are.

:rotfl:

Must be in between all your neg repping me left and right lately, like some child who didn't like what's been truthfully said about her fake golden haired false idol of a "President" and is still steaming over it. :chuckle:

Whoops - their come Musti odored, PJ'd and Dazed...

MADs my foot.

Thank God for Rom. 5: 6-8.

 

[Tambora]

Yeah...Okay...sure you are.

:rotfl:

Must be in between all your neg repping me left and right lately, like some child who didn't like what's been truthfully said about her fake golden haired false idol of a "President" and is still steaming over it. :chuckle:

Whoops - their come Musti odored, PJ'd and Dazed...

MADs my foot.

Thank God for Rom. 5: 6-8.

Your foot is always in your mouth.

 

[heir]

How quickly you forget heir spit on that book, that one time I mentioned I was re-reading it.

:baby:

 

[heir]

Two kinds does a hybrid make.

Galatians 3:29 KJV and Ephesians 2:11-12 KJV two kinds thus saith the scripture.

 

[Danoh]

Galatians 3:29 KJV and Ephesians 2:11-12 KJV two kinds thus saith the scripture.

Fact of the matter is that the promise being referred to in Galatians 3 is exactly the same as that of the narrative of Romans 4 and 5 and Ephesians 2's - that righteousness which is by faith that is made ours by the Spirit the moment we trust that Christ died for our sins.

Acts 17: 11, 12.

 

[Danoh]

:baby:

Exactly why you and your pals are so clueless about your 40 or so plus errors, and counting - you read a thing into the words of others, and then just as quickly conclude "it means what it says."

:chuckle:

You continue to..amuse.

Rom. 5: 6-8.

 

[heir]

Exactly why you and your pals are so clueless about your 40 or so plus errors, and counting - you read a thing into the words of others, and then just as quickly conclude "it means what it says."

:chuckle:

You continue to..amuse.

Rom. 5: 6-8.

You are divisive, pathetic and jealous that some of us believe the KJB and 1 Corinthians 1:10. Galatians 3:29 KJV Gentiles were different than the Ephesians 2:11-12 KJV. Why do you resist the truth?

 

[heir]

Fact of the matter is that the promise being referred to in Galatians 3 is exactly the same as that of the narrative of Romans 4 and 5 and Ephesians 2's - that righteousness which is by faith that is made ours by the Spirit the moment we trust that Christ died for our sins.

Acts 17: 11, 12.

The Galatians had a hope. The Ephesians to whom Paul wrote the letter had none. They were as DIFFERENT as night and day. Why do you resist the truth?

 

[Danoh]

The Galatians had a hope. The Ephesians to whom Paul wrote the letter had none. They were as DIFFERENT as night and day. Why do you resist the truth?

Repeat that childish mantra all you need to.

And childishly neg rep me all you want.

And childishly call me all the names you can dream up.

It does not change the obvious fact that one major flaw in your "study" approach is your obvious failure to follow the basic flow of thought the various passages asserting one thing or another, cannot but follow.

This hybrid you were taught has literally turned the whole of Paul's Acts writings into "another; which is not another" at all.

Your assertions on Galatians alone fail to follow that Epistle's basic flow of thought.

You seriously need to consider you just might be off - way off.

1 Corinthians 3:15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.

Rom. 5: 6-8.

 

[heir]

Repeat that childish mantra all you need to.

Oh, the irony...

It does not change the obvious fact that one major flaw in your "study" approach is your obvious failure to follow the basic flow of thought the various passages asserting one thing or another, cannot but follow.

This doesn't even make sense. Is English your first language?

This hybrid you were taught has literally turned the whole of Paul's Acts writings into "another; which is not another" at all.

This is a slanderous report. We must 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV.

Your assertions on Galatians alone fail to follow that Epistle's basic flow of thought.

I'm believing what saith the scripture about who the Galatians were Acts 13:26 KJV, Galatians 3:29 KJV. Clearly, they had a hope per Genesis 12:3 KJV. This was unlike that of the Ephesians to whom Paul wrote the letter who were in time past without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world (Ephesians 2:11-12 KJV).

You seriously need to consider you just might be off - way off.

I recognize the difference that is clearly there. You reject it.

 

[Danoh]

You have just now proven once more the consistent failure of your hybrid's approach - the consistently obvious fact that one major flaw in your "study" approach is your obvious failure to follow the basic flow of thought the various passages asserting one thing or another, cannot but follow.

Heck, you even failed to understand that simple study approach principle's description.

Thank God for Romans 5: 6-8.

In others words - 1 Corinthians 11:25's "do ye...in remembrance of me..."

Ya, ya, blah, blah, blah - you hybrids are the odd bunch within "MAD" who butcher 1 Corinthians 11 into "another; which is not another" at all.

This, even as you turn a blind eye to the even further sell out of one of your pals...

http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?127962-Local-church-question-for-MADs

Some pals ya'll are.

 

[DAN P]

You have just now proven once more the consistent failure of your hybrid's approach - the consistently obvious fact that one major flaw in your "study" approach is your obvious failure to follow the basic flow of thought the various passages asserting one thing or another, cannot but follow.

Heck, you even failed to understand that simple study approach principle's description.

Thank God for Romans 5: 6-8.

In others words - 1 Corinthians 11:25's "do ye...in remembrance of me..."

Ya, ya, blah, blah, blah - you hybrids are the odd bunch within "MAD" who butcher 1 Corinthians 11 into "another; which is not another" at all.

This, even as you turn a blind eye to the even further sell out of one of your pals...

http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?127962-Local-church-question-for-MADs

Some pals ya'll are.

Hi and since you brought up 1 Cor 11:25 , so what does it mean ??

dan p

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

More of your reading into a thing.

In this case, twice. :chuckle:

Rom. 5: 6-8.

Blessed and cursed, both in Genesis 12.
Two types.
You know it, but do not like it.

 

[heir]

You have just now proven once more the consistent failure of your hybrid's approach - the consistently obvious fact that one major flaw in your "study" approach is your obvious failure to follow the basic flow of thought the various passages asserting one thing or another, cannot but follow.

Heck, you even failed to understand that simple study approach principle's description.

Thank God for Romans 5: 6-8.

In others words - 1 Corinthians 11:25's "do ye...in remembrance of me..."

Ya, ya, blah, blah, blah - you hybrids are the odd bunch within "MAD" who butcher 1 Corinthians 11 into "another; which is not another" at all.

This, even as you turn a blind eye to the even further sell out of one of your pals...

http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?127962-Local-church-question-for-MADs

Some pals ya'll are.

Seek professional help.

 

[SaulToPaul 2]

In others words - 1 Corinthians 11:25's "do ye...in remembrance of me..."

Col
2:20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,