Yes. The laws regarding the priesthood.
That's not what it says.
(Heb 7:12) For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also.
"The Law" refers to the whole law, not just one particular part of it.
Yes. The laws regarding the priesthood.
In the beginning, God created the old covenant. (Per Tet)
If the Law is a physical representation of God (it's called perfect and righteous and true in the Psalms multiples of times), then why would it need to go away?
Incorrect. It is specific to the priesthood. The previous clause makes it obvious.That's not what it says.
(Heb 7:12) For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also.
"The Law" refers to the whole law, not just one particular part of it.
What about how He lived? Is that important?
What about how He lived? Is that important?
Just so I'm clear, you're saying that God created something for us that He had no intention of us actually being able to do? I wonder how his statements about it not being too difficult in Deuteronomy 30 or 31 or whatever.Because no one can keep it. It's impossible to keep it.
Is that how normal schoolmasters work? They teach you all of things that you can't possibly do? Or is it that they incrementally teach you the things that lead to the next lesson, all things building on the previous teachings so as to produce an educated person? You have strange beliefs.The law was a schoolmaster to show us we need a Savior because we can't keep it.
Something we can agree on.Only faith in Christ Jesus makes us righteous before God. Trying to keep the law does not make you righteous before God:
(Gal 3:11) Clearly no one who relies on the law is justified before God, because "the righteous will live by faith."
In order to be a good Jew?! He did those things because they are part of Him-if He is the Law (Word) made flesh, those things are His very nature. And again, if the Jewish economy was destroyed, why didn't Peter and Paul and the rest of the apostles get the memo; they still lived Jewish lives.He was still in the Jewish economy. He had to do those in order to be a good Jew. But when the cross happened the Jewish economy got destroyed. Thus we do not have to keep them because Jesus kept them for us.
I never said that keeping the Law made you righteous-that's your belief about me. I believe that His keeping of the Law certainly gave us grace so that when we mess up, we are forgiven.Yes.
That's the only way you can be made righteous before God.
It was His perfect faith, His perfect righteousness that is the only way you can be made righteous before God.
And, it can only be done by faith, not by trying to keep the law.
In order to be a good Jew?! He did those things because they are part of Him-if He is the Law (Word) made flesh, those things are His very nature. And again, if the Jewish economy was destroyed, why didn't Peter and Paul and the rest of the apostles get the memo; they still lived Jewish lives.
No they didn't. They were told to eat "unclean" creatures, ate with Gentiles, and didn't feel the need to observe feasts and sabbaths. Paul said he was all things to all men. He would live like a gentile to win them over to Jesus.
Again, learn the difference between "fulfilled" and "abolish"
What do you think "fulfilled" means?
Do you think the law is still in place after it is fulfilled?
For example the Passover was fulfilled by Christ Jesus when He Himself became the sacrifice.
Therefore, the Passover Feast has been fulfilled, it no longer is a requirement.
Jesus didn't abolish Passover, He fulfilled it.
19 Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever [j]keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Col 2:16 Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath.
Col 2:17 These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ.
There you go. None of these feasts or holy days matter. Who cares?! The only important thing is Christ.
That's not what it says.
(Heb 7:12) For when the priesthood is changed, the law must be changed also.
"The Law" refers to the whole law, not just one particular part of it.
He was still in the Jewish economy. He had to do those in order to be a good Jew. But when the cross happened the Jewish economy got destroyed. Thus we do not have to keep them because Jesus kept them for us.
Sir, you could not have stepped on your tongue any harder. He says they ARE, present tense shadows of things to come, IN THE FUTURE.
(Col 2:17 NIV) These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.
The most important part of the verse is the last part: "the reality, however, is found in Christ".
Proof? All of this is unsubstantiated and had been addressed. Feel free to rescue what has already been said.
Sir, you could not have stepped on your tongue any harder. He says they ARE, present tense shadows of things to come, IN THE FUTURE. On your interpretation he should have said, These WERE shadows of things in the past.